Dear Rochelle, I am sorry I miswrote the rubric. It should have been Rage from Shining Objects not rage in the Sunshine. I use this rubrics metaphorically, thus being able to use rubrics which otherwise are hardly ever used. A patient is very unlikely to say they get in a rage when they see a shinin...

I was asked to go into more detail about this rubric by a few people. I recently had a case which will give a good example of the use of this rubric. 6 weeks ago I had a child brought to me in a wheelchair. His mother had lupus during pregnancy. This cause clotting of the blood through the umbillica...

Dear Rochelle, Regarding this case. When we give a remedy we are always mindful of exactly what we expect. If we see some improvements, as is so in this case, but a persistent mental state, which is still remaining and not reducing after our remedy then we know we have either a partial remedy or our...

Dear Rochelle,

<

Dave

You wrote:

<

Dear Charlotte, you wrote: Divya Chhabra has done proving of several remedies in potencies 30c, 200c, lM, 10M and 50M. Lots of people over the years have tried to demystify potency, and I read Divya article with interest but cannot wholly agree with her. She cites examples of someone having a fear o...

Dear Dave,

<

Dear Soroush,

you wrote:

<

Dave,

you wrote:

<

Dear Tracy With regard to your mail about change of potency. The esential issue is effectively to change potency to correspond to the level of te disease and the susceptibility of the patient. I often go down in potency after giving 30c. The reason being that the disease has returned and remained bu...