In the Organon (aph 108 on) Hn gives exact instructions on how a proving
should be conducted.
An important point is that the volunteer should be in good health to start
with - almost symptom free.
Also the effects of first proving must be completely over before another
proving is undertaken.
Importantly one remedy should be taken and wait a good while before a second
dose is given and as soon as symptoms start, no more doses should be
given/taken.
Deviate and you are asking for trouble!
Lastly, what happened to Kent exactly?? Did he over do it on provings on
himself?
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Remedy Proving
-
Julian Winston
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: Remedy Proving
At 10:53 PM +0100 10/29/04, Finrod wrote:
[snip]
At 8:47 PM +1000 10/29/04, Chris Gillen wrote:
I do not understand what you mean "what happened to Kent." Please
ask the question in some kind of context. Kent, as far as I know, did
not do many provings on himself.
Schmidt talked of Kent being turned on to homeopathy by Dr. Phelan
"... a doctor who was quite old....with his white beard and black
coat..."
When Kent met Phelan Kent was 29 and Phelan was 42. The obit pic of
Phelan shows a dark haired man with a small dark goatee.
Where did Schmidt get this info? I would not hesitate to say either
HE made it up (there is nothing like a good story!) or Gladwin did.
JW
[snip]
At 8:47 PM +1000 10/29/04, Chris Gillen wrote:
I do not understand what you mean "what happened to Kent." Please
ask the question in some kind of context. Kent, as far as I know, did
not do many provings on himself.
Schmidt talked of Kent being turned on to homeopathy by Dr. Phelan
"... a doctor who was quite old....with his white beard and black
coat..."
When Kent met Phelan Kent was 29 and Phelan was 42. The obit pic of
Phelan shows a dark haired man with a small dark goatee.
Where did Schmidt get this info? I would not hesitate to say either
HE made it up (there is nothing like a good story!) or Gladwin did.
JW