Swine flu

Post by **Soroush Ebrahimi** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:32 am

Now then Liz
If he had not considered polypharmacy and people had stumbled upon it (as per your consideration of HAVING MOVED ON), you may have had point for discussion.
But the fact that the Master considered it depth and categorically rejected it is of great importance.
Now Hn would not have rejected it, if it had had any merit.
The fact that some colleagues are trying something that Hn has REJECTED, shows only a backward step. They are NOT moving on to any where!
Best wishes
Soroush

________________________________

From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Liz Brynin
Sent: 29 July 2009 21:51
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Swine flu
Yes, Soroush, but....
1) The difficulty with a second prescription doesn't apply with an acute.
2) Some of us have moved on since Hahnemann's days and want to try different methods. Which is not to reject everything, just to say that there must be more than one way to skin a cat. And generally, something as good as homeopathy will have more than one method of use. Otherwise, it wouldn't be 'great'.
3) Even Hahnemann himself progressed and altered his ideas - and that was a long time ago.
Sorry to disagree:-)
Liz
________________________________

warriorhomeopath · Post by **warriorhomeopath** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:36 am

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Joy Lucas wrote:
Wow - we were taught at college that there was no homeopathic police force. Clearly that was another thing we were taught wrong (like we weren't taught that Sheilagh Creasey is THE authority on classical homeopathy, or that Kent's method is the ONLY method etc) - I see that the homeopathic police force is ALIVE AND WELL on this Yahoo group. You guys are astounding! I cannot belive you are for real! I cannot believe you have the time for this! Shouldn't you be out there practising homeopathy? Then you might actually be able to get an insight into the mind of Hahnemann and how homeopathy works, how people get better, and whether they care why.

Richard Nash- Shannon · Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:56 am

If it's all too much for you, please do move on. There is nothing worse than someone whining about someone whining.
Add something to the conversation or hit delete. Otherwise....

Best regards, Rik
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "warriorhomeopath" wrote:

Richard Nash- Shannon · Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:09 am

Hello Liz,
Since you have "advanced" beyond the scope of old, static Homeopathy, and well beyond Hahnemann, perhaps you would be more comfortable taking part in a group where you were not constantly critiqued for practicing whatever it is that you practice. If you want to try new things, go right ahead.................. and post it elsewhere.
You could leave all of this boring Homeopathy stuff to the stodgy old guard that constantly has to point out to you that you seem to be engaging in stuff far too advanced for us to comprehend.

Second prescriptions don't apply to acutes? Care to enlighten us?

All the best, Rik
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Liz Brynin" wrote:

Magda · Post by **Magda** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:12 am

From: "warriorhomeopath"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 5:24 PM
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Swine flu
##### Well, your 'college' also did not teach you to respect those who have
a LOT more experience both as practitioners and as HAHNEMANNIAN Homeopaths
than you do! Have you EVER done a proving? Have you ever supervised,
conducted and published any provings in addition to having a practice? FYI,
Joy has done that!

Maybe it is time there is a Homeopathic Police, considering how much
bastardizing of Homeopathy there is in a so-called "Hahnemannian Homeopathy"
list!

BTW, could you sign your posts so we know how to address you??

Thanks,

Magda Aguila
Aquiline LLC
Animal Nutrition and
Homeopathic Consultations
www.aquilinedanes.com

Post by **Soroush Ebrahimi** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:19 am

- What college was that then?
- Didn't know about Sheilagh Creasy? Well poor you? You missed out a big lot!
- On this site, we care about what Hn taught. We are currently going through the Organon one aphorism at a time. Perhaps you would care to join us in the discussion of any points arising. Sadly a lot of so called homeopaths (even those who lecture at some colleges) have never read the Organon cover to cover. There is great scope for learning.
And if you do not wish to learn how we value the teachings of Hahnemann, then I guess you know how to use your keyboard!
I wish you the best
Soroush

________________________________

From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of warriorhomeopath
Sent: 29 July 2009 22:25
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Swine flu
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , Joy Lucas wrote:
Wow - we were taught at college that there was no homeopathic police force. Clearly that was another thing we were taught wrong (like we weren't taught that Sheilagh Creasey is THE authority on classical homeopathy, or that Kent's method is the ONLY method etc) - I see that the homeopathic police force is ALIVE AND WELL on this Yahoo group. You guys are astounding! I cannot belive you are for real! I cannot believe you have the time for this! Shouldn't you be out there practising homeopathy? Then you might actually be able to get an insight into the mind of Hahnemann and how homeopathy works, how people get better, and whether they care why.

Chris_Gillen · Post by **Chris_Gillen** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:50 am

What insights do you have into the mind of Hahnemann, and how homoeopathy
works?

Liz Brynin · Post by **Liz Brynin** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:43 am

Yes, Soroush, indeed you have a point there and I understand exactly what you mean.
But you see, I have a problem with the fact that there are so many different types of combinations now, many more than Hahnemann tried, and personally, I sometimes use (and have used on myself) some of the Narayani remedies, for example, and from my own experience and also from what other colleagues say, they work - in fact they are sometimes amazing!
So I do think that there is an argument for trying different ideas. I realise this upsets people, nevertheless that is what I think.
This is NOT to deny or denigrate in any way the power of the classical prescription. But sometimes - and let's get real here - for lack of time, or to tide one over in a difficult situation, there are arguments for polypharmacy - that's all.
Liz
________________________________
________________________________

Liz Brynin · Post by **Liz Brynin** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:49 am

Hello Rik
Once again, I didn't bring this topic up, but I will defend someone's right to mention it without being jumped on - that just puts my hackles up. Face it - there are a lot of homeopaths who stick rigidly to what Hahnemann taught, but there are even more, like me, who use other approaches as well. And it's fine. And no-one drops dead!
And no - I'm not going to argue about it any more or defend myself - see my reply to Soroush.
that's all.

Liz

Shannon Nelson · Post by **Shannon Nelson** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:20 am

Hi Warrior, Liz, and anyone,

While the other homeopathy lists are smaller and for the most part quieter than this one, they are also friendlier, more permissive of "broader viewpoints," and more conducive to general discussion than Minutus is currently. Rather than "spitting into the wind," why not come over to one (or more) of those?

(Staying here for the Organon posts would be great; but for general conversation, the outlook for the moment is brighter elsewhere!)

Write me privately if you'd like more information.

Best wishes,
Shannon
________________________________