I got this today, was going to give it a cursory look and then 
sign--after all, it purports to give consumers the right to choose the 
medical treatments they want, even if "unapproved" at the time.  But 
this part sticks in my throat:
--------------
This bill contains numerous patient protections, including strict 
informed consent procedures. ... Information about beneficial results 
must be reported to the National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine at NIH, and information about negative results 
must be reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 
**Even one adverse event will result in the unapproved product being 
removed from the market.** [emphasis mine]
------------
WHAT???  "Even one adverse event *will* result in the ... product being 
removed from the market"???  This looks to me like a "Trojan horse".  
If pharmaceuticals had to be withdrawn because of "even one adverse 
event" there would be none on the market!
Thoughts, anyone?  Is there any *possible* way that this (AMTA) could 
be anything other than a disaster?
Here's the rest of it:
*****
  Hi Shannon,
Help  Pass the  Access to Medical Treatment Act
  ----------
  It's your health, and when you're a patient the treatment you receive 
should be your decision. The Access to Medical Treatment Act (AMTA) 
currently being considered by Congress gives back the authority to 
patients and their doctors to use medical treatments and devices that 
have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Urge 
Congress to pass the Access to Medical Treatment Act >>
The Access to Medical Treatment Act (ATMA) is legislation  being 
considered by Congress that amends current laws  restricting patients 
access to critical medical treatments -  and restores your right to 
choose the best treatment for you.
This is a bill that could save lives. If passed it gives Americans 
access to therapies that are being used  safely and effectively in 
other countries, but which are not  available here because the FDA has 
not approved them.
Urge  Congress to act swiftly to pass the Access to Medical Treatment  
Act:   http://go.care2.com/e/HHh/dr/ODCa
The FDA drug approval process is lengthy, expensive, and can take over 
a decade to complete. Many companies are financially unable to undergo 
this process, and many patients do not have the time to wait that long. 
In addition, many of these health treatments have been researched, 
approved and used safely and effectively in other countries for years. 
Passing this bill will allow people access to treatment and medicine 
they otherwise could not have.
And doctors using alternatives in medicine, nutritionists, naturopaths 
and others will finally be free to use the  therapies they believe are 
best for their patients, and no longer be harassed, censured or subject 
to recrimination.
People should have the right to choose their medical  treatment. Sign  
our petition and urge your Representative to pass the Access to  
Medical Treatment Act.
Thank you for caring to make a difference today -- with  Care2,
  ----------
  Michael Lawley,
  Care2 and ThePetitionSite team
Thank you for signing up to receive Health Alerts via ThePetitionSite 
or Care2 website! Your email address has not been bought from other 
sources. If you learned something interesting from this newsletter, 
please forward it to your friends, family and colleagues.
To stop receiving this newsletter, visit:
http://www.care2.com/newsletters/unsub/ ... 8/bae0b95e
  or send a blank email message to:
ng-u-14-7631168-369-418-f3cd82b2@australia.care2.com
  Care2.com, Inc.
  275 Shoreline Drive, Suite 150
  Redwood City, CA 94065
http://www.care2.com
  ----------
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
			
			
									
						US-AMTA, another Health Freedom bill--Worrisome!
- 
				Shannon Nelson
 - Posts: 8848
 - Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
 
- 
				Catherine Creel
 - Posts: 16
 - Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2002 11:00 pm
 
Re: US-AMTA, another Health Freedom bill--Worrisome!
Dear Shannon,
Regarding the Access to Medical Treatment Bill, as so often happens
on the WWW, the terms of the bill are being misinterpreted. One
adverse event does not mean a product or practice will be removed from
the market. If a product or practice is proven to be dangerous, it
will cease.
I never take anyone's word for anything without researching it
myself. In this case, if you go to
you can read
the bill for yourself. The http://thomas.loc.gov/ website is the
place to go to look up any bill in Congress or the Senate.
Regards,
Catherine
			
			
									
						Regarding the Access to Medical Treatment Bill, as so often happens
on the WWW, the terms of the bill are being misinterpreted. One
adverse event does not mean a product or practice will be removed from
the market. If a product or practice is proven to be dangerous, it
will cease.
I never take anyone's word for anything without researching it
myself. In this case, if you go to
you can read
the bill for yourself. The http://thomas.loc.gov/ website is the
place to go to look up any bill in Congress or the Senate.
Regards,
Catherine

