Truth

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Jean Doherty
Posts: 1576
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:00 pm

Truth

Post by Jean Doherty »

Wondering how this over years has affected provings, Jean

It is World Year of Physics. It is therefore worth remembering that
quantum theory shows that observers alter the very nature of the atomic
systems they observe. Humans do the same in their pursuit of truth.
Even "absolute" scientific truth.

Robyn Williams presents the ABC Science Show . TOMORROW Susan Hopkins
on gender


robin9168
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 3:49 pm

Re: Truth

Post by robin9168 »

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, jean doherty
wrote:
that
the atomic
truth.
A very important factor in homeopathy or any other energy
medicine. Much more than we as a profession like to think . It
influences provings and patient responses IMHO. Many
homeopaths react quite badly to such suggestions.


Shannon Nelson
Posts: 8848
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Truth

Post by Shannon Nelson »

Behaviors at the quantum level are very different from those at the
macroscopic level. Perhaps some things *are* the same at both levels
(e.g. perhaps a "regular world" observer really does influence the
thing s/he is observing), but perhaps not... Paraphrasing a recent
Discover magazine: An electron can be in two places at once--can you?
Newtonian physics works very well within our general size range; but it
fails utterly (and resoundingly, a positively weirdly!) at the
sub-atomic scale (and at other extremes as well). Scientifically
minded people tend to get queasy when these parallels are drawn too
freely...
/ :-/
Shannon


Shannon Nelson
Posts: 8848
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Truth

Post by Shannon Nelson »

Yes indeed...
I was thinking about that. Actually I can get fairly (as JW used to
say) woo-woo myself, but I do get squeamish when theory tries to
overthrow observations, which is exactly the impression that so many of
"such suggestions" come across to me. And if they raise *my* hackles
(and I am, actually, pretty darned willing to make leaps into the
unknown, *when* such leaps seem justified to me), then I really squirm
thinking how they will affect people who are both more scientifically
trained (and rigorous) than I, and also less "pre-washed" (y'know, like
pre-washed jeans, being so already broken-in?). It really makes me
uncomfortable, tho I realize a certain amount of conflict (between
folks of different trainings and different backgrounds) is certainly
inevitable, and we don't need to be *too* apologetic about it.

We keep hearing stories about really weird "coincidences" that happen
during provings, after prescribing, etc., so by now I (personally
speaking) completely accept that there seems to be an intriguing
"non-Newtonian" aspect to the whole thing. (*What* whole thing? Er,
um... To Be Determined...) But I think (speaking personally again)
that we will do ourselves a disservice if we slide to easily into an
"anything goes" frame of mind.

Sigh, it's late, I'm tired, I can't run this thread to the end like I'd
like to, sadly.
Just wanted to throw in some thoughts about it, tho.
Sleepy cheers,
Shannon


Joy Lucas
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Truth

Post by Joy Lucas »

On 20 Jul 2005, at 03:31, Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:
Delusion separated :-)

'Behaviour', and all it represents, whether at quantum level, cellular
level, macroscopic or paranormal level, are pointers to recognisable
diseased states.

Best wishes, Joy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”