with regard to David's repetitionof the dose posting
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2005 4:32 pm
At 07:44 PM 6/18/2005, you wrote:
Dear Robin,
As you modified your methods by using low potencies like 6c and 12c to
prevent aggravations why doubt the changes I made in my practice are based
on similar clinical experiences? Why is my experience a mental projection
or blind faith and yours somehow scientific? Also what I wrote was about my
experience with the *LM potency *not the 6c or 12c. The medicinal powers of
the LM potency are NOT the same as the 6c and 12c. Let us be precise about
the nature of the experiments we are discussing. They ARE different
potencies so expect differences.
Repeating low potencies in dry doses works well enough on its own level
but Hahnemann developed a later system that works on a much different
level. I have found that not all cases can be cured with low C potencies
like 6c and 12c. For his reason, I use from 6c to 1M, etc., and a full
range of LM potencies 0/1 to 0/30. You cannot adjust the size of the dose
or the potency factor of the dry dose in a similar manner as the medical
solutions. That these changes made to the delivery system makes a
difference in the action of the remedies has been proven around the world
by scores of practitioners over the last 20+ years.
Kent's idea that the size of the dose and the nature of the delivery
system makes no difference in the action of remedies has been proven wrong
and Hahnemann's postulates have been proven correct. They only way you can
find out about this aspect of posology is to test these methods in the
clinic in the proper manner for a decent amount of time. Without
undertaking serious clinical trials the rest is projection.
Sincerely, David Little
---------------
"It is the life-force which cures diseases because a dead man needs no more
medicines."
Samuel Hahnemann
Visit our website on Hahnemannian Homoeopathy and Cyberspace Homoeopathic
Academy at
http://www.simillimum.com
David Little © 2000
Dear Robin,
As you modified your methods by using low potencies like 6c and 12c to
prevent aggravations why doubt the changes I made in my practice are based
on similar clinical experiences? Why is my experience a mental projection
or blind faith and yours somehow scientific? Also what I wrote was about my
experience with the *LM potency *not the 6c or 12c. The medicinal powers of
the LM potency are NOT the same as the 6c and 12c. Let us be precise about
the nature of the experiments we are discussing. They ARE different
potencies so expect differences.
Repeating low potencies in dry doses works well enough on its own level
but Hahnemann developed a later system that works on a much different
level. I have found that not all cases can be cured with low C potencies
like 6c and 12c. For his reason, I use from 6c to 1M, etc., and a full
range of LM potencies 0/1 to 0/30. You cannot adjust the size of the dose
or the potency factor of the dry dose in a similar manner as the medical
solutions. That these changes made to the delivery system makes a
difference in the action of the remedies has been proven around the world
by scores of practitioners over the last 20+ years.
Kent's idea that the size of the dose and the nature of the delivery
system makes no difference in the action of remedies has been proven wrong
and Hahnemann's postulates have been proven correct. They only way you can
find out about this aspect of posology is to test these methods in the
clinic in the proper manner for a decent amount of time. Without
undertaking serious clinical trials the rest is projection.
Sincerely, David Little
---------------
"It is the life-force which cures diseases because a dead man needs no more
medicines."
Samuel Hahnemann
Visit our website on Hahnemannian Homoeopathy and Cyberspace Homoeopathic
Academy at
http://www.simillimum.com
David Little © 2000