Dear Friends,
Perhaps our friends on Barrett's list could take the following quiz I gave
to the 35 people who attended my introductory homeopathy talk at a local
college last Tuesday night (I'll send the correct answer tomorrow night, and
the point I was trying to make. The number following each answer is the
number of votes it got):
"When these little strings vibrate, they create notes...the melodies that
these notes can play out is called 'matter,' and when these melodies create
symphonies, that's called the 'universe.' String theory...is defined in ten
dimensional hyperspace...this...theory...may allow us to read the mind of
God--the music resonating through hyperspace may be the mind of God."
Who said this?
A) A transcendentalist poet--1
B) A schizophrenic patient at the state mental hospital--6
C) An authority in theoretical physics--12
D) A "Star Trek" character--4
E) A science fiction writer--1
F) A mystic saint--5
G) A chaneled transmission from the Pleiades--3
H) Undecided--3
Charlotte Gilruth
science--a definition?
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: science--a definition?
Michio Kaku
C) An authority in theoretical physics--
.
Best wishes, Anthony
C) An authority in theoretical physics--
.
Best wishes, Anthony
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm
Re: science--a definition?
If any one is deluded enough to think they can read the mind of God, then
they are way off course!
The created cannot even imagine the creator, let alone attempt to read the
creator's mind.
Try again??
Soroush
they are way off course!
The created cannot even imagine the creator, let alone attempt to read the
creator's mind.
Try again??
Soroush
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: science--a definition?
Of course one can read the mind of God. This is not a delusion. The delusion
is that we cannot. God is the sum total of all things. If one removes
oneself from the equation, one can see/feel/read the rest. This is
understanding Wholism in the most extreme and purest way. Of course, only
those who are totally successful at dominating the ego would be capable of
doing this. I cannot claim this ability and, I doubt that anyone, except the
holiest (wholiest) among us could even begin to approach this point. It is
our destiny, however, to someday become whole, that is, to be consciously
reintegrated into the mind of God. All the evidence and testimony of the
greatest among us is clear on this.
Allen
is that we cannot. God is the sum total of all things. If one removes
oneself from the equation, one can see/feel/read the rest. This is
understanding Wholism in the most extreme and purest way. Of course, only
those who are totally successful at dominating the ego would be capable of
doing this. I cannot claim this ability and, I doubt that anyone, except the
holiest (wholiest) among us could even begin to approach this point. It is
our destiny, however, to someday become whole, that is, to be consciously
reintegrated into the mind of God. All the evidence and testimony of the
greatest among us is clear on this.
Allen
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 4510
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm
Re: science--a definition?
I think your view is a bit like trying to understand what is going on inside
the Sun by looking at its reflection through a mirror on a wall.
The creator and the created are so separate and different that they are not
one the same plane.
It is a bit like expecting the chair to understand the mind of the
carpenter!!
Best regards
Soroush
the Sun by looking at its reflection through a mirror on a wall.
The creator and the created are so separate and different that they are not
one the same plane.
It is a bit like expecting the chair to understand the mind of the
carpenter!!
Best regards
Soroush
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm