Danger: Forced vaccination under CDC

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Sara Klein Ridgley PhD
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 3:48 pm

Danger: Forced vaccination under CDC

Post by Sara Klein Ridgley PhD »

Please read this carefully. If you decide to send to others, just CUT
AND PASTE please, do not hit 'forward'.

Sara
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: "PROVE"
Reply-To: newsletter@vaccineinfo.net
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 08:52:29 -0800

Subject: [PROVE] DANGER - FORCED Vaccination for ALL under CDC's
Dear PROVE Members,

Forward this to anyone who wants to maintain their right over what
medications or vaccines are forced into their own bodies.

Below is an article detailing horrifying legislation commissioned by the
Centers for Disease Control and written by one of the most dangerous
conniving strategists for public helath police power that I have ever
read the works of. It provides for the legal forced vaccination of
anyone - including adults with vaccines that are made by drug companies
immune from liability for the side effects. Lawrence Gostin has a long
history of trying to brainwash people that sacrificing individuals'
rights for society is okay in many areas of medical policy. His record
speaks for itself. He is a threat to the freedoms our country was built
upon. And now his ideas are codified in legilsation that will be pushed
around the country ostensibly offering "security" from microbes in
exchange for your freedom to make your own medical decisions.

I would like to underscore that everyone needs to be watching their
state legislatures very closely for any proposed changes and increases
of police powers for public health bureaucrats. When they are talking
about loss of public benefits for refusing vaccination (which they are
tiptoeing around by lumping it with "treatment"), they are referring to
things like your abiltiy to have driver's liscence and live a normal
life. They've already done it to our children with the abiltiy to get
an education - it is time for this extortion to stop. I cannot count
all the times parents have told me that they thought they had the right
to decide what vaccines their child should receive until they actually
tried to make that choice.

Everyone who values our freedoms and rights in this country needs to
commit to educating family and friends about the dangers of such an
unchecked medical dictatorship.

Every vaccine is different and so is each individual. There are many
people who physically cannot tolerate some vaccines because of the havoc
they will wreak on their bodies and immune systems. Because there has
been NO research into the biological mechanisms that predispose people
to vaccine reactions and there has been no effort to screen out these
individuals, this type of action should be condemned as it would create
unfathomable human suffering and sacrifice.

PROVE continues to assert that vaccination is a medical procedure that
has the ability to cause injury and death and therefore the assesment of
risks and benefits and ultimate decision should be made by the
individual without government force or sanctions. Anyone who has a
concern about a particular virus or bacteria and wants to be vaccinated
should have that right just as anyone who doesn't should be protected
and respected to make that decision.

Sincerely,

Dawn Richardson
President, PROVE

http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/304/b ... powers_sta
tes+.shtml

Model health law empowers states Drugs, quarantine could be forced
This story ran on page D4 of the Boston Globe on 10/31/2001.

By Bloomberg News,, 10/31/2001 WASHINGTON - States would be able to
force patients to take medication under model legislation outlining when
and how governors can use emergency powers to address public health
crises such as recent anthrax attacks.

The model law, commissioned by the US Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, also would give people the right to appeal states' decisions
to quarantine or isolate them. Individuals with contagious diseases,
such as smallpox, wouldn't be able to appeal orders for treatment or
vaccination under the law.

State governments are concerned that laws are inadequate to address new
kinds of public health threats such as the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks
on buildings in New York and Washington or the use of germ or chemical
weapons.
Fifteen Americans have been infected with anthrax, a deadly bacterial
disease, and thousands more are taking antibiotics as a precaution.

Lawrence Gostin, chief author of the model law and a professor at
Georgetown University Law Center, said the academic panel that drafted
the proposal tried to balance the need to control disease with
individuals' civil rights - something he said isn't done under many
current state laws. ''We felt if we were too Draconian and didn't
respect people's rights, that meant the terrorists would win,'' Gostin said.

Emergency powers allow governors to suspend normal government
temporarily, letting states swiftly address disease epidemics or natural
disasters such as earthquakes. Legal and public health experts at
Georgetown University and Johns Hopkins University examined all states'
emergency-powers laws in crafting the model.

Under the model law, states could quarantine or isolate individuals who
are infected with a contagious disease, though the patients would have
the right to appeal that decision in court. The patient would remain
quarantined or isolated until the appeals process was exhausted, Gostin
said.

Patients could be forced to take medicines or receive vaccines for
contagious diseases that pose a public health threat, such as smallpox,
under the model law. Patients wouldn't be allowed to appeal a state's
decision, though the state would likely quarantine anyone who refused to
comply, triggering an appeals process, Gostin said.

States would avoid civil liberties violations if they enact laws that
spell out penalties such as the loss of public benefits, instead of
incarceration, for patients who refuse treatment, said R. Alta Charo, a
professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School.
© Copyright 2001 Globe Newspaper Company.


Allen Coniglio
Posts: 429
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Danger: Forced vaccination under CDC

Post by Allen Coniglio »

Has anyone ever heard of the "mark of the beast"?

Allen


Laura Peterson
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:00 pm

Re: Danger: Forced vaccination under CDC

Post by Laura Peterson »

I think it refers to the mark left by the smallpox vaccination. I have
one.
Laura

On Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:37:13 -0800 "allen coniglio"
writes:
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.


Beverly Shamon
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: Danger: Forced vaccination under CDC

Post by Beverly Shamon »

HI Allen

you are most likely refering are you not to the scripture in "Revelation
13:17 where it prophecies regarding our times 'and that nobody might be able
to buy or sell except a person having the mark, the name of the wild beast
or the number of its name'. Very apt

Beverly
subject of 'Digest' to ashahrdar@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”