Page 1 of 2

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:27 am
by Shannon Nelson
Can anyone compare Tuberculinum and Bacillinum for me--esp. anyone who uses
both?
Thanks!
Shannon

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:40 am
by Jean Doherty
I have always thought Bacillinum more indicated if any skin condition. Jean

Robert&Shannon Nelson wrote:

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 11:57 am
by Simon King LCPH MARH
Someone did write a whole thesis on this - I cannot immediately call it
to memory
will let you know if I do:-)
SK
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 2:11 pm
by Rochelle
Dr AU Ramakrishan says that Bacc is indicated for skin that scars and doesn't heal quickly.

Regards
Rochelle
www.rochellemarsden.co.uk

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 3:48 pm
by Jenny Decker
I have used Bacillinum in three cases, two children and one cat, and in all
three cases my choice was dictated by food preferences. All three patients
showed a marked aversion to chicken, which, in non-vegetarians, I feel is
unusual.
Jenny Decker
_____

From: Jean Doherty [mailto:clelly@bigpond.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:41 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Tub vs. Bac?
I have always thought Bacillinum more indicated if any skin condition. Jean

Robert&Shannon Nelson wrote:

and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.
subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@yahoo.com to receive a single daily
digest.
Clinical Guidance for Homeopaths and Students of Homeopathy!
http://www.shahrdarhost.net/Clinical%20Guidance.htm
ATTENTION PLEASE:

The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and
educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding
the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read
or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or
email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use
remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its
individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental,
special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.

****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!

If you do not wish to receive individual emails, send a message with the
subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@yahoo.com to receive a single daily
digest.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
click here

_____

Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/minutus/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
minutus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:06 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Thanks, that would be wonderful if you do!
Shannon

on 12/3/04 4:57 AM, Simon King at sk2004@ntlworld.com wrote:

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:11 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Thanks Rochelle, but I'm thinking there must be more to it!
I had initially thought that the two were pretty much the same, but have
since gathered otherwise. Looking thru rubrics, I'm intrigued by some of
the rubrics that have bac but not tub, e.g.:

Indifference to eating (1; 9 rxs)
Lamenting, bemoaning (2; 101 rxs)
Morose, sulky, cross, ... in children (3!; 25 rxs)
Prostration of mind, brain fag (1; 292 rxs--I thought Tub should be there
too???)
Generalities, children, complaints in, delicate, puny, sickly (2; 9
rxs-shouldn't Tub be there??)
Enervation, ... easy (1; 6 rxs)
Weariness, morning (1; 83 rxs)

In the case I'm looking at all of these rubrics apply pretty strongly, and
I'm surprised not to see Tub there. Could this be an issue of the nosodes
in general being not so well represented? (And why would that be, come to
think of it?

In the past Tub has not worked for him, and I've always assumed that if Bac
were the needed remedy that Tub would at least give *some* good result?

Thanks!
Shannon

on 12/3/04 5:07 AM, rochelle at rochelle@ntlworld.com wrote:

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:20 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Thanks Jenny!
Can you say more about those three cases? What were the other
symptoms/picture, and were there other food desires/aversions that you
recall?
Shannon

on 12/3/04 8:47 AM, Jenny Decker at ladybast@mindspring.com wrote:

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:53 pm
by Beth Landau-Halpern
I have looked high and low for notes that established for me the sense that
Bac was better if the symptoms were primarily on the physical plane, and Tub
preferable when there is a predominance of mental/emotional symptoms as well
as a family or personnal history that suggests a tub. miasm. Not sure where
that comes from. Also, I rarely use tub in an acute, but will use tub-av or
bac in severe coughs when the symptoms indicate--generally to good effect.

Beth

Re: Tub vs. Bac?

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 4:00 pm
by Soroush Ebrahimi
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]