Singh's method
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2004 9:17 am
And what about INDIVIDUALISATION?
What worries me about books such as 'Classical Homoeopathy Revisited' is
that it is based on the thinnest ever evidence from some work Hn did and
never followed on.
Such books are published and in my view mis-lead a lot of people. The people
who write such books often find the method is futile and give up, but then
never write about the fact that they have changed their ways.
What I would like to know if the authors are still carrying on with this
method. Does any one have any info on it?
Rgds
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
What worries me about books such as 'Classical Homoeopathy Revisited' is
that it is based on the thinnest ever evidence from some work Hn did and
never followed on.
Such books are published and in my view mis-lead a lot of people. The people
who write such books often find the method is futile and give up, but then
never write about the fact that they have changed their ways.
What I would like to know if the authors are still carrying on with this
method. Does any one have any info on it?
Rgds
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]