And what about INDIVIDUALISATION?
What worries me about books such as 'Classical Homoeopathy Revisited' is
that it is based on the thinnest ever evidence from some work Hn did and
never followed on.
Such books are published and in my view mis-lead a lot of people. The people
who write such books often find the method is futile and give up, but then
never write about the fact that they have changed their ways.
What I would like to know if the authors are still carrying on with this
method. Does any one have any info on it?
Rgds
Soroush
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Singh's method
-
Jeremy Crowley
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Singh's method
In a message dated 25/06/04 09:11:48 GMT Daylight Time, finrod@webstar.co.uk
writes:
And what about INDIVIDUALISATION?
My description was rather brief, but you do not have to blindly follow the
system.
The method includes the 'indicated remedt' ,
I select the apropriate Nosode where I see a miasmatic influence.
I select a dyscrasia remedy if apropriate, Pritam singh usesd Hepar a lot
as many people have mercury fillings etc. and he say this as a barrier to
cure, but could also be drug dyscsasias, eg Fol for women on contraceptive pill.
Rad Brom if patient has had barium meals. (especialy High blood pressure in
patient who have had barium meals)
An organ remedy can be selected for any organ weakness you see.
It is belt and bracers, but it can be ibdividualised.
I find that treating acute symptoms with symptomatic remedies often not
effective or short lived, Using Deep acting remedies can be slow. Wit hay fever
for instance, the hay fever season has often gone before you get results (how
many hayfever sufferers will really take Kent's advice and come for
treatment around christmas time)
By using well selected using Nosobes, drainage, Dyscrasia and symptomatic
remedies I can usualy get very rapid and long lasting results with hay fever
while improving their general health. I do not allways use this method but to
be honest I think I should use it more, not less, it is good.
You can use all your skills to carefully select individuals remedies and use
them in a logical sequence that has been tried and tested.
Deciding whether to use this method or not, or a variation on this method is
a further oportunity for individualisation.
Jeremy Crowley
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
writes:
And what about INDIVIDUALISATION?
My description was rather brief, but you do not have to blindly follow the
system.
The method includes the 'indicated remedt' ,
I select the apropriate Nosode where I see a miasmatic influence.
I select a dyscrasia remedy if apropriate, Pritam singh usesd Hepar a lot
as many people have mercury fillings etc. and he say this as a barrier to
cure, but could also be drug dyscsasias, eg Fol for women on contraceptive pill.
Rad Brom if patient has had barium meals. (especialy High blood pressure in
patient who have had barium meals)
An organ remedy can be selected for any organ weakness you see.
It is belt and bracers, but it can be ibdividualised.
I find that treating acute symptoms with symptomatic remedies often not
effective or short lived, Using Deep acting remedies can be slow. Wit hay fever
for instance, the hay fever season has often gone before you get results (how
many hayfever sufferers will really take Kent's advice and come for
treatment around christmas time)
By using well selected using Nosobes, drainage, Dyscrasia and symptomatic
remedies I can usualy get very rapid and long lasting results with hay fever
while improving their general health. I do not allways use this method but to
be honest I think I should use it more, not less, it is good.
You can use all your skills to carefully select individuals remedies and use
them in a logical sequence that has been tried and tested.
Deciding whether to use this method or not, or a variation on this method is
a further oportunity for individualisation.
Jeremy Crowley
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]