Dear Nandana and all,
Early stages (asymptomatic, symptom free) are easier to treat, no doubt. "Before and lossing the immunity" is not an accurate expression. A person is losing immunity from day one of infection unless they are actively working to prevent it. ie through proper nutrition, herbal/homeopathic support etc. Let's say "from totally losing their immunity".
GOOD NUTRITION is the number 1 treatment for HIV/AIDS. There's a lot of info on the web about this. Please don't neglect guiding your patient on this matter.
The mental shock on learning one is HIV+ has to be dealt with, only rx's will not always do the trick. Counselling and emotional support is critical. Often there is social and family ostracism the person has to deal with, and usually grief from losing a partner (which is how they often realise they are + themselves).
Personally I never had much confidence in using AIDS nosode as the source of the donor is, necessarily, secret. Besides the source was an American (or european) and homosexual. That "picture" I didn't find applicable to the African "picture".
AIDS Miasm? Well here in Africa I can certainly believe it emerging as many babies are born from + parents. Can I describe it? not really, I haven't studied this disease as a "miasm". I would say, however, this disease carries more secrecy, shame, denial and grief than anything else. (more sycotic than sycosis, more syphilic than syphilis)
Our practical experience in Kenya has been multi-level.
1. PC1
PC1 from Peter Chappell appears to work very well with consistency. It can be used alone with nutritional support. Even late stage pts respond within days and weeks. All sx subside, appetite increases, etc.
However care must be taken that the pt is monitored for compliance to instructions. We have had occasions when PC1 caused a downturn (aggravations or what?). Usually due from non-compliance to instructions (including abstinence / safe sex during treatment). Howver when PC1 works, it works incredibly well.
At the upcoming Int'l AIDS Conference in Bangkok in July, I will be distributing a document from Peter as well as some results from our naturopathic protocols. [no, i will not be "presenting" because this Conference is still very much an allopathic-world bank-bill gates thing. they aren't interested in alternative medicine, but I'll still get a few minutes to say something]
I've put this document on the Abha Light website and can be downloaded as a pdf file.
2. Naturopathic & nutritional support
Naturopathic & nutritional support is essential for any PLWHA (person living with HIV/AIDS). No medicine alone will ever do the trick. If the person neglects right nutrition, your medicine will fail no matter how you give it.
Based on the Mark Konlee's website www.keephope.net and his book Immune Restoration Handbook, I published the book Great Health Naturally (with copyright privileges from Mark). GHN is especially geared to the poor as affordable immune-based therapy. True it's got a bit of a Kenyan tilt, but the basic info is universal. You can read it online on the Abha Light website or order hardcopies from ALF.
3. Constitutional & Therapeutic Homeopathic Approaches
From the homeopathic viewpoint, HIV is (nearly) like any other disease. Treat in the method already know. Treat on the symptoms presented. Even if you choose not to try PC1, our classical and therapeutic approaches work well.
Remember, it is NOT a "chronic" disease but sort of a long-term "acute". The difference being that in this situation, multiple infections are likely to occur simultaneously and frequently, each *may* have its own *picture*. The complexity of symptoms may or may not be contained in a single remedy. The virulance of the disease(s) may need a rapid response from the practitioner. In later stages you may need to be seeing the patient frequently- every week or so - until you see their health pick up.
Constitutional: If the person in still in early stages without many complications, we find constitutional work well to maintain the immune system. Still, I question its efficacy, in exclusive of other treatment, actually reducing the viral load. It may or may not work, I don't have stats for that.
Therapeutic: In later stages of HIV/AIDS, we found therapeutic/clinical approaches to be effective, and perhaps multiple remedies needed. In these cases we may give tinctures (up to 3x), mixed potencies and remedies to attack the multi-level problems that are being faced. Rapid changes in remedies may be necessary.
(I've recently wondered if applying Dr.Ramakrsnan's plussing technique would be effective?)
Some common remedies we've found effective:
tinctures: neem, africa potato, alfalfa, organ-specifics
in low or high potencies: hydrogen, ars. lyc, phos, sepia, thuja, nat mur, rhus tox. & "disease-" or "organ-" "specific" therapeutic rxs.
Other good things: orally taken Hydrogen Peroxide,see internet for info. Colloidal silver in small and infrequent doses only. Any kind of "immune-boster" and vitamin/mineral supplements.
Some common conditions that must be constantly dealt with:
Candida (oral, intestinal, genital)
This is the most difficult chronic cnodition to deal with, and not dealing with it immediately can bring the rest of the immune system down completely.
Intestinal health is a must.
96% of HIV resides within the GI Tract, expecially in the intestines. The pH of the intestines should be below 6,0 to literally kill off HIV. This can be done with naturopathic and herbal approaches. (see Great Health Naturally)
my links:
www.abhalight.org/
PC1 www.abhalight.org/pc1.html
Great Health Naturally www.abhalight.org/ghn.html
Read GHN online www.abhalight.org/greathealth.html
Sincerely,
Didi Ananda Ruchira
Director, Abha Light
visit: www.abhalight.org
tel: +254 20 787310 / cell: 0733-895466
re: HIV
Re: re: HIV
In einer eMail vom 22.06.04 16:26:50 (MEZ) - Mitteleurop. Sommerzeit schreibt
a.ruchira@abhalight.org:
<< GOOD NUTRITION is the number 1 treatment for HIV/AIDS. There's a lot of
info on the web about this. Please don't neglect guiding your patient on this
matter.
The mental shock on learning one is HIV+ has to be dealt with, only rx's
will not always do the trick. Counselling and emotional support is critical.
Often there is social and family ostracism the person has to deal with, and
usually grief from losing a partner (which is how they often realise they are +
themselves).
Personally I never had much confidence in using AIDS nosode as the source of
the donor is, necessarily, secret. Besides the source was an American (or
european) and homosexual. That "picture" I didn't find applicable to the African
"picture".
AIDS Miasm? Well here in Africa I can certainly believe it emerging as many
babies are born from + parents. Can I describe it? not really, I haven't
studied this disease as a "miasm". I would say, however, this disease carries more
secrecy, shame, denial and grief than anything else. (more sycotic than
sycosis, more syphilic than syphilis)
23.6.4.
This was good - regarding the nutrition, which is by all means essential.
However AIDS is not luesinic or whatever. There are fundamental differences to
lues or borreliosis (Lyme disease) and other comparable (so called luesinic)
remedies like Thuja, Argentum, Aurum, Mercury, etc. There is tissue distruction
as such but in another sense than luesinic which always must have "ulceration",
loss of tissue, loss of material, of substance. AIDS is loss of substance but
only in the end - these patients actually die from substance loss not from
something else, a substance loss which can not be caught up with, can not be
substituted so far.
However, another point worth discussing in my opinion at least, is the
susceptibility issue in the case of AIDS.
I mean, I did and I do have hepatitis C patients in which the husband was
seropositiv chronic active state (he was allopathically healed) and the wife not!
And there are cases HIV+ for more than 20 years or so and nothing happens.
Obviously, a balanced immunity ... While others go down quite fast ...
The nutrition point however - I repeat - was indeed very good being stressed.
It is the point I also meant in my last intervention as non-homeopathic
aspect but I did not consider it wise to extend on that, because it is very
complex. If there is somebody interested in THIS stuff, it will be my pleasure to
refer in details. It is very interesting especially while we are making the every
day experience, that maybe 90% of humans do NOT know how to eat and what to
eat or viceversa they do eat wrong, which is an important susceptibility factor.
All the mentioned books are nice and good, but the fundamental question
remains the constitutional remedy plus the rest.
Given the easiness with which almost EVERYONE might get infected, the level
of similarity for this nosode seems to be positioned very low, something like
Arnica montana or even lower. Much lower than tuberculinum for ex, which is
extremely wide spread. Very unspecific or only slightly specific.
Regarding the anonimity of a potential AIDS nosode donor, it does not matter
what his/her name is. The picture must be similar, identical.
Due to the essential lymphatic (in other words blood) involvement, which is
always, in the first place phosphoric, it could be that AIDS has a phosphoric
"touch". Kind regards, Dr. medic. Viorel V. Bucur (www.dr-bucur.com).
a.ruchira@abhalight.org:
<< GOOD NUTRITION is the number 1 treatment for HIV/AIDS. There's a lot of
info on the web about this. Please don't neglect guiding your patient on this
matter.
The mental shock on learning one is HIV+ has to be dealt with, only rx's
will not always do the trick. Counselling and emotional support is critical.
Often there is social and family ostracism the person has to deal with, and
usually grief from losing a partner (which is how they often realise they are +
themselves).
Personally I never had much confidence in using AIDS nosode as the source of
the donor is, necessarily, secret. Besides the source was an American (or
european) and homosexual. That "picture" I didn't find applicable to the African
"picture".
AIDS Miasm? Well here in Africa I can certainly believe it emerging as many
babies are born from + parents. Can I describe it? not really, I haven't
studied this disease as a "miasm". I would say, however, this disease carries more
secrecy, shame, denial and grief than anything else. (more sycotic than
sycosis, more syphilic than syphilis)
23.6.4.
This was good - regarding the nutrition, which is by all means essential.
However AIDS is not luesinic or whatever. There are fundamental differences to
lues or borreliosis (Lyme disease) and other comparable (so called luesinic)
remedies like Thuja, Argentum, Aurum, Mercury, etc. There is tissue distruction
as such but in another sense than luesinic which always must have "ulceration",
loss of tissue, loss of material, of substance. AIDS is loss of substance but
only in the end - these patients actually die from substance loss not from
something else, a substance loss which can not be caught up with, can not be
substituted so far.
However, another point worth discussing in my opinion at least, is the
susceptibility issue in the case of AIDS.
I mean, I did and I do have hepatitis C patients in which the husband was
seropositiv chronic active state (he was allopathically healed) and the wife not!
And there are cases HIV+ for more than 20 years or so and nothing happens.
Obviously, a balanced immunity ... While others go down quite fast ...
The nutrition point however - I repeat - was indeed very good being stressed.
It is the point I also meant in my last intervention as non-homeopathic
aspect but I did not consider it wise to extend on that, because it is very
complex. If there is somebody interested in THIS stuff, it will be my pleasure to
refer in details. It is very interesting especially while we are making the every
day experience, that maybe 90% of humans do NOT know how to eat and what to
eat or viceversa they do eat wrong, which is an important susceptibility factor.
All the mentioned books are nice and good, but the fundamental question
remains the constitutional remedy plus the rest.
Given the easiness with which almost EVERYONE might get infected, the level
of similarity for this nosode seems to be positioned very low, something like
Arnica montana or even lower. Much lower than tuberculinum for ex, which is
extremely wide spread. Very unspecific or only slightly specific.
Regarding the anonimity of a potential AIDS nosode donor, it does not matter
what his/her name is. The picture must be similar, identical.
Due to the essential lymphatic (in other words blood) involvement, which is
always, in the first place phosphoric, it could be that AIDS has a phosphoric
"touch". Kind regards, Dr. medic. Viorel V. Bucur (www.dr-bucur.com).