Combo provings?

[snoozybun]

In all this discussion of the ethics of remedy combinations, no one
yet has suggested doing official provings of various combos. If the
main objection to them is that they are unproven as combinations, then
should not such provings be done, so we can see what symptoms they
manifest as a combination?

[Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD]

That becomes a mathematical, and practical, impossibility........

Which combo would you choose for your proving? every OTC one is different and there are billions of combinations possible............

Then those of us who use combos sometimes, do prepare them or prescribe them individually according to the perceived needs of every patient (at least I do), so again here, like in unicism, never twice the same combo/remedy...........

OTC combos and Practitoner-made combos are totally different.

Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind""

[snoozybun]

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. J. Rozencwajg. MD. PhD."
wrote:
different and there are billions of combinations possible............
The idea is one would choose one of the OTC combos -- the idea is to
get the symptomology of a particular combination of homeopathic
remedies, not the idea of combinations. Treat the combo as a single
remedy: what symptoms does it truly elicit?

Alia

[Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD]

I understand that, but what will that bring you???? compared to single substances????

So we will know the scope of action of ONE combo........of course it would be interesting to see whether that action covers the combined action of the different components, as claimed, or if it brings out totally new symptoms.........

Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind""

[snoozybun]

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. J. Rozencwajg. MD. PhD."
wrote:
single substances????

You will then know what is the action of that particular combination
of potentized remedies. Combos are not going to disappear, so
wouldn't it be better to know what their actual homeopathic symptom
pictures are? Then we can tsk-tsk them and condemn them from a
position of knowledge. It certainly would behoove the manufacturers
to underwrite such provings. One could also prove and compare symptom
pictures of the same substances combined first then potentized.

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

Hi

Once a 'combo' is properly proved, it then becomes a 'single' remedy.

)

That is the whole point - let the combo proponents prove one and see whether
their prescribing was homoeopathic!!

That will be an excellent challenge.

Soroush
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 21:52:25 -0000
From: "snoozybun"
Subject: Combo provings?

In all this discussion of the ethics of remedy combinations, no one
yet has suggested doing official provings of various combos. If the
main objection to them is that they are unproven as combinations, then
should not such provings be done, so we can see what symptoms they
manifest as a combination?

[APEX PRECITECH]

A Mr XX will patent one and the YY, XY ----- will all
patent something. The risk of proving must be before
patenting. Tell this to the law makers and if this
actually happens,just by the sheer work needed for
this proving, everyone will overnight turn classical.

I think you know what a proving is. Sometimes a
proving may run for years. To get to the core of a
remedy is a mammoth job. These combo docs want to have
an easy outing and they do just fine with names of
diseases and a few corresponding general drugs. If
you talk to them about proving, characteristics and
individualization,--- well , it's asking too much.
After all,they do it for some bread. They never know
that a royal meal awaits them if they just comprehend
what is real homeopathy. People will pour money on
good healers. Not killers.

Regards
Venkat
--- snoozybun wrote:

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partner online
Go to: http://yahoo.shaadi.com/india-matrimony