Dear Taj
i give you a easy way to do classical homeopathy
just study:-
this method is called trio study:-
1. hahnemann classifivation of diseases
2.study miasms
3.just listen the pateint language and see carefully gestures of pateint.
you will come to know constitutions easily and prescription will be very
easy
regards
Dr Naval kumar
_________________________________________________________________
Thinking of a vacation? Get all the best deals. http://www.msn.co.in/Travel/
Right here at MSN Travel!
classical homeopathy
Re: classical homeopathy
WRONG. CLASSICAL DOES NOT BELEIVE IN DISEASES. IF THEY DO THEN HAHNEMANN'S TIME'S DISEASES ARE THE STORY OF PAST. Study of homeopathy does not lie in many old books except Provings. Just study modern medical books, try to figure out what the hell is happening at spiritual, emotional, molecular and cellular . level. Try to map the old stuff to the new stuff and you have answer. But it takes hard work and a lot ass rubbing on ground as Bush is now rubbing in Iraq.
Nanga
"Dr.Naval Kumar" wrote:
Dear Taj
i give you a easy way to do classical homeopathy
just study:-
this method is called trio study:-
1. hahnemann classifivation of diseases
2.study miasms
3.just listen the pateint language and see carefully gestures of pateint.
you will come to know constitutions easily and prescription will be very
easy
regards
Dr Naval kumar
_________________________________________________________________
Thinking of a vacation? Get all the best deals. http://www.msn.co.in/Travel/
Right here at MSN Travel!
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, send a message with the subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.
Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/minutus/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
minutus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Nanga
"Dr.Naval Kumar" wrote:
Dear Taj
i give you a easy way to do classical homeopathy
just study:-
this method is called trio study:-
1. hahnemann classifivation of diseases
2.study miasms
3.just listen the pateint language and see carefully gestures of pateint.
you will come to know constitutions easily and prescription will be very
easy
regards
Dr Naval kumar
_________________________________________________________________
Thinking of a vacation? Get all the best deals. http://www.msn.co.in/Travel/
Right here at MSN Travel!
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, send a message with the subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@yahoo.com to receive a single daily digest.
Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/minutus/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
minutus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
-
Dr.Naval Kumar
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: classical homeopathy
I think the concept is still not clear to you,why you chose homeopathy when
you dont understand the vital hahnemanian concept of homeopathic disease
classifivcations and dont talk of bush he know his job well and has done it
and shown to world,
wake up!!!!!!
_________________________________________________________________
Old pals, ex-flames, great times. Catch up with the past! Sign up now!
http://www.batchmates.com/msn.asp
you dont understand the vital hahnemanian concept of homeopathic disease
classifivcations and dont talk of bush he know his job well and has done it
and shown to world,
wake up!!!!!!
_________________________________________________________________
Old pals, ex-flames, great times. Catch up with the past! Sign up now!
http://www.batchmates.com/msn.asp
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: classical homeopathy
Hahmenann does speak of (and therefore prescribe for) disease; the Organon
uses the term many times! But his *definition* of "disease" is indeed
different from the modern allopathic definitions.
Shannon
on 4/10/04 1:25 AM, Nanga Pir at nangapir@yahoo.com wrote:
uses the term many times! But his *definition* of "disease" is indeed
different from the modern allopathic definitions.
Shannon
on 4/10/04 1:25 AM, Nanga Pir at nangapir@yahoo.com wrote:
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: classical homeopathy
Dr. Kumar, Can you say a bit about (1), Hahnemann's classification of
diseases? Do you mean classification according to miasm, or something else?
Thankyou,
Shannon
on 4/10/04 12:37 AM, Dr.Naval Kumar at ssoindia@hotmail.com wrote:
diseases? Do you mean classification according to miasm, or something else?
Thankyou,
Shannon
on 4/10/04 12:37 AM, Dr.Naval Kumar at ssoindia@hotmail.com wrote:
-
Dr.Naval Kumar
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: classical homeopathy
For those who think allopathic way of disease classification !,are totally
wrong they cant do homeoapthy,please if you have a little time ,read the
hahneman 'chronic miasms' you will understand everything
regards
Dr Naval kumar
_________________________________________________________________
Studies, career, romance. Whatever your concerns.
http://www.astroyogi.com/newMSN/ We have the answers.
wrong they cant do homeoapthy,please if you have a little time ,read the
hahneman 'chronic miasms' you will understand everything
regards
Dr Naval kumar
_________________________________________________________________
Studies, career, romance. Whatever your concerns.
http://www.astroyogi.com/newMSN/ We have the answers.
-
Anna de Burgo
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:00 pm
Re: classical homeopathy
Dear Dr Kumar,
I am always a little surprised when homeopaths say we should completely
reject allopathic disease names. Surely, these names give us a very specific
indication of exactly what the symptoms are that the patient is suffering
from, and they also give us some clear indications about organ pathology,
disease causation (at the cellular level at least), and so on? Are they not
a useful guide? We know that disease itself may go deeper, which is why
addressing it or undermining it at the energy or biomagnetic level as with
homeopathy is able to bring about more lasting cures. But why is there so
much antagonism towards clear labelling of the outward manifestation of the
disease? It seems to me that Hahnemann is very comfortable with using
allopathic disease labels in the right context, as a quick browse through
"Chronic Diseases" shows. As long as we do not think, like allopathy, that
the disease is cured simply by preventing the symptoms - i.e. as long as we
are responsible and sensible about disease "names", I agree with you that we
should not shy away from them.
Warmly,
Anna
_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
I am always a little surprised when homeopaths say we should completely
reject allopathic disease names. Surely, these names give us a very specific
indication of exactly what the symptoms are that the patient is suffering
from, and they also give us some clear indications about organ pathology,
disease causation (at the cellular level at least), and so on? Are they not
a useful guide? We know that disease itself may go deeper, which is why
addressing it or undermining it at the energy or biomagnetic level as with
homeopathy is able to bring about more lasting cures. But why is there so
much antagonism towards clear labelling of the outward manifestation of the
disease? It seems to me that Hahnemann is very comfortable with using
allopathic disease labels in the right context, as a quick browse through
"Chronic Diseases" shows. As long as we do not think, like allopathy, that
the disease is cured simply by preventing the symptoms - i.e. as long as we
are responsible and sensible about disease "names", I agree with you that we
should not shy away from them.
Warmly,
Anna
_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
-
Dr.Naval Kumar
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: classical homeopathy
Dear Anna
we are talking of homeopathy! i am surprised why you talk of diagnostic name
of disease ,this way of understanding disease is a part of study of modern
medicine, yes this is a criteria/tool to know prognosis of disease for
modern medicine ,
but we have observations in homeopathy(kent,herring,hahnemann,.....)these
homeopathic observations are based on human objective and subjective
symptoms and in otherside,in allopathic these are based on pathological &
microbiological/radiological lab reports
and do you know any data of allopathic cured disease like cancer people die
more of treatment than disese and you are depending on that system of
treatment.......
and any othe more inquiry ,you are most welcome i am here to solve.
sincerely yours
Dr Naval kumar
_________________________________________________________________
Contact brides & grooms FREE! http://www.shaadi.com/ptnr.php?ptnr=hmltag
Only on www.shaadi.com. Register now!
we are talking of homeopathy! i am surprised why you talk of diagnostic name
of disease ,this way of understanding disease is a part of study of modern
medicine, yes this is a criteria/tool to know prognosis of disease for
modern medicine ,
but we have observations in homeopathy(kent,herring,hahnemann,.....)these
homeopathic observations are based on human objective and subjective
symptoms and in otherside,in allopathic these are based on pathological &
microbiological/radiological lab reports
and do you know any data of allopathic cured disease like cancer people die
more of treatment than disese and you are depending on that system of
treatment.......
and any othe more inquiry ,you are most welcome i am here to solve.
sincerely yours
Dr Naval kumar
_________________________________________________________________
Contact brides & grooms FREE! http://www.shaadi.com/ptnr.php?ptnr=hmltag
Only on www.shaadi.com. Register now!
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: classical homeopathy
Hi Anna,
In my experience (which of course might not be accurate), most homeopaths
don't completely reject allopathic disease names; we just use the
information differently than an allopath would. I agree with you that the
diagnosis (disease name) can be useful for the reasons you've mentioned. In
addition, knowing the diagnosis helps us know what to expect with regard to
possibility of cure, and expected speed and course of recovery.
But the disease name may be irrelevant to the choice of remedy; e.g. if I
see a strong match with a certain remedy in the mentals (or perhaps other
aspects), I will likely give that remedy, *even if* I don't see any record
of it having ever cured the particular "disease" or symptoms I'm aiming for.
Also, our definition of "disease" is so much broader than the allopathic
definition, and in many cases the allopathic "diagnosis" is nothing more
than a description of observed symptoms (e.g. "fibrymyalgia", "chronic
fatigue", even "cancer") and gives us basically *nothing* to go on with
regard to remedy choice.
But so often people come to the lists (or to homeopaths) asking for "a
remedy for [disease name]", and all one can say -- again and again -- is
that "homeopathy doesn't work that way"...
Hahnemann did indeed use disease names, but he also qualified them -- "a
typhoid-*like* disease", etc. I agree, tho -- disease names (diagnosis) can
be useful, *if* the limits and proper use of it are understood.
Best wishes,
Shannon
on 4/10/04 10:01 AM, Anna de Burgo at annadeburgo@hotmail.com wrote:
In my experience (which of course might not be accurate), most homeopaths
don't completely reject allopathic disease names; we just use the
information differently than an allopath would. I agree with you that the
diagnosis (disease name) can be useful for the reasons you've mentioned. In
addition, knowing the diagnosis helps us know what to expect with regard to
possibility of cure, and expected speed and course of recovery.
But the disease name may be irrelevant to the choice of remedy; e.g. if I
see a strong match with a certain remedy in the mentals (or perhaps other
aspects), I will likely give that remedy, *even if* I don't see any record
of it having ever cured the particular "disease" or symptoms I'm aiming for.
Also, our definition of "disease" is so much broader than the allopathic
definition, and in many cases the allopathic "diagnosis" is nothing more
than a description of observed symptoms (e.g. "fibrymyalgia", "chronic
fatigue", even "cancer") and gives us basically *nothing* to go on with
regard to remedy choice.
But so often people come to the lists (or to homeopaths) asking for "a
remedy for [disease name]", and all one can say -- again and again -- is
that "homeopathy doesn't work that way"...
Hahnemann did indeed use disease names, but he also qualified them -- "a
typhoid-*like* disease", etc. I agree, tho -- disease names (diagnosis) can
be useful, *if* the limits and proper use of it are understood.
Best wishes,
Shannon
on 4/10/04 10:01 AM, Anna de Burgo at annadeburgo@hotmail.com wrote:
-
Sheri Nakken
- Posts: 3999
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: classical homeopathy
gag
At 12:17 PM 04/10/2004 +0000, you wrote:
and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.
subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@yahoo.com to receive a single daily
digest.
At 12:17 PM 04/10/2004 +0000, you wrote:
and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused.
subject of 'Digest' to minutusgroup@yahoo.com to receive a single daily
digest.