Dear Shannon, it is so very common for homeopaths NOT to prescribe a remedy
because the remedy isn't known or understood well enough. One of the best
ways round this (apart from reading as much as possible about the remedy) is
to put the unknown remedy into a small group with other remedies that also
might apply to the case and do a thorough comparison. This is why the
Materia Medicas are so much more important that repertories.
I can't remember what the possible Sepia case was all about but some MM's
include Sepia in the comparative remedies (Calc phos being the closest).
The 'nostalgia' you mention could be read as the 'sad and reflective'
attitude that Carb an has. There are many remedies which live in the past
but it depends whether the nostalgia is a happy one or not.
Best, Joy
www.homeopathicmateriamedica.com
on 17/3/04 8:47 PM, Bob&Shannon at
shannonnelson@tds.net wrote:
Thanks Joy,
But actually my question is about using the remedy *not* as a specific. I
would like to be able to recognize it -- or at least *think* of it! -- at
stages earlier than malignancy, and possibly also lacking in delusions and
maybe even lacking in indurations.
The person I'm looking at it for (and I think I will go ahead and try it,
but still would like more understanding of it) has no malignancy (so far as
anyone knows!), does have easy weakness/debility, venous stasis, flatulence,
digestive trouble, nostalgia(!!!), and also *many* of the other features of
the remedy as found in rubric extraction. That's why I'm interested in
exploring the remedy even tho she *doesn't* have the things it has been most
particularly known for (no malignancy, and I don't know about induration;
there was some, but it's not something she's mentioned much). I definitely
can "make a case" for giving her the remedy, but I also "made a case" (you
and I both found it a convincing one!) for sepia, and similarly for other
remedies before that. But I haven't yet found what she really needs, so I'm
exploring less-familiar possibilities.
Very often I find that various remedies look great on the basis of their
rubric extraction, but unless I know more about what makes the remedy
"tick", what it "usually" has, or etc., I do way too much trial-and-error.
I realize this is also an issue of casetaking and case analysis, of course,
but I also feel hampered by not understanding the remedy.
Thanks!
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]