Dear Albert, Minutus is a wonderful list in part because we all agreed in the
beginning to not speak negatively of anyone or something along those lines.
It is in the beginning agreement; quite some time ago that I read that. We do
not put other people down, nor do we curse in our emails. I am sure you know
your history and how division and infighting among homeopaths in the US
opened the door to the downfall of homeopathy around 1900 in the US. I hope
that you will join us in growing respect and consideration for others in the
homeopathic community worldwide. Thank you, Nancy Tichenor
To Albert-gastritis
Re: To Albert-gastritis
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, n.tichenor@a... wrote:
"I am sure you know your history and how division and infighting
among homeopaths in the US opened the door to the downfall of
homeopathy around 1900 in the US."
Well, sweetie baby, honeypoo, that ain't what happened; and any
reading of the literature of the day, which I would expect is
required reading for everyone in homeopathy, will show that the
Hahnemannians found themselves overwhelmed by low-potency pseudo-
homeopaths (LPHs).
They, in fact, abandoned their beloved American Institute of
Homeopathy (AIH) to those "mongrels," as they often called them, and
founded the International Hahnemannian Association along with the
high-potency pseudo-homeopaths (HPHs).
Compromises of homeopathy is what destroyed American homeopathy,
sweety baby, honeypoo, in no small measure finished by the infamous
FLEXNOR REPORT (1910).
And you'll find that Hering warned that we'd see things like the
Kentians and Vithoulkas school of thought become dominant if we
continued to permit such compromises of legitimate homeopathy.
The door was open by Dunham, while President of the AIH, in a
Presidental Address in which he tacitly granted the consession LPHs
had wanted.
OOps! big mistake!
I know the history of homeopathy pretty well, it seems.
I suggest you go back to school and get that course, okey dokie?
--------
I'm still looking for someone to tell me what Hering said a few days
before he went through transition warning us to keep homeopathy
secure from compromises.
Folks, this is rather interesting, for it should also be required
reading in the schools.
Hint, it contains the phrase "inductive method."
Does nobody here know this very important admonishment nor why it was
said?
"I am sure you know your history and how division and infighting
among homeopaths in the US opened the door to the downfall of
homeopathy around 1900 in the US."
Well, sweetie baby, honeypoo, that ain't what happened; and any
reading of the literature of the day, which I would expect is
required reading for everyone in homeopathy, will show that the
Hahnemannians found themselves overwhelmed by low-potency pseudo-
homeopaths (LPHs).
They, in fact, abandoned their beloved American Institute of
Homeopathy (AIH) to those "mongrels," as they often called them, and
founded the International Hahnemannian Association along with the
high-potency pseudo-homeopaths (HPHs).
Compromises of homeopathy is what destroyed American homeopathy,
sweety baby, honeypoo, in no small measure finished by the infamous
FLEXNOR REPORT (1910).
And you'll find that Hering warned that we'd see things like the
Kentians and Vithoulkas school of thought become dominant if we
continued to permit such compromises of legitimate homeopathy.
The door was open by Dunham, while President of the AIH, in a
Presidental Address in which he tacitly granted the consession LPHs
had wanted.
OOps! big mistake!
I know the history of homeopathy pretty well, it seems.
I suggest you go back to school and get that course, okey dokie?
--------
I'm still looking for someone to tell me what Hering said a few days
before he went through transition warning us to keep homeopathy
secure from compromises.
Folks, this is rather interesting, for it should also be required
reading in the schools.
Hint, it contains the phrase "inductive method."
Does nobody here know this very important admonishment nor why it was
said?
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Dec 16, 2002 11:00 pm
Re: To Albert-gastritis
Dear Albert,
You talk a lot about pseuds... well, one thing we know for sure - you are no
pseud. You are a genuine idiot.
Regards,
George, one of the scum
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool emoticons - download MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
You talk a lot about pseuds... well, one thing we know for sure - you are no
pseud. You are a genuine idiot.
Regards,
George, one of the scum
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself with cool emoticons - download MSN Messenger today!
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
Re: To Albert-gastritis
Very groovy, very groovy, George, but I think you need a mirror or a
new dictionary, because one of dem's busted, pal.
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "George Kaplan"
wrote:
you are no
today!
new dictionary, because one of dem's busted, pal.
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "George Kaplan"
wrote:
you are no
today!
-
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: To Albert-gastritis
If it's necessary to continue this, could it happen off-list? And if anyone
else needs to "contribute", could they do it privately so the rest of us can
get back to something interesting?
on 9/25/03 5:04 PM, Albert at hahnemannian444@yahoo.com wrote:
else needs to "contribute", could they do it privately so the rest of us can
get back to something interesting?
on 9/25/03 5:04 PM, Albert at hahnemannian444@yahoo.com wrote:
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: To Albert-gastritis
I heartily agree. I have just joined this group and I do NOT want to receive
emails that are fuelled by invective of this sort. Abuse does nothing to
further homoeopathy - it just creates division.
Garry
emails that are fuelled by invective of this sort. Abuse does nothing to
further homoeopathy - it just creates division.
Garry