what is to be cured in disease (was: a bland case?)

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Shannon Nelson
Posts: 8848
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm

what is to be cured in disease (was: a bland case?)

Post by Shannon Nelson »

Couple of comments:

on 9/6/03 7:57 AM, J.venkatasubramanian at apexpreci2000@yahoo.co.in wrote:
"Totality" is a relative term... She covered *a* totality very nicely, but
I think his point is that there *might* have been a larger totality that
might have achieved a broader cure. (And I emphasize "might"; it's
obviously speculative only!)
Actually, I don't think Joy has given us enough information really to say
whether it was a "partial" or "deep" simillimum, and if the information were
available (which I gather it is not), I'd find it very interesting to know
the follow-up at greater depth and over a much longer time-frame.

We don't know if there were things "to be cured" beyond the polyps and
restlessness; several of us feel there might have been, but we don't have
enough information IMO to speak to that confidently.

We don't know how deep or broad or long-lasting the remedy's effects were;
we don't know whether her emotional state improved, or whether any new sxs
developed, or "what happened then"... In this particular case (due to her
age and circumstances and the fact that she was not *looking* for more),
this is moot; but if the patient were younger, it might be very relevant.
And for purposes of using this case to enhance our understanding of the
remedy, we can't to doo much without more info about the remedy's effects,
*beyond* the (short-term or long?) amel. of the polyps.

I really enjoyed this case, and for me it was instructive on several points
-- e.g. an illustration of "follow the case" -- prescribing on symptoms
which *are* present, in preference to speculating about those that might or
might not be; and also calling my attention to this interesting remedy!

(Perhaps I'm forgetting or missing something -- but what is it that tells
you these things were either innate (so presumably immovable?) or having
nothing to do with the case? The fact that they weren't moved by Teucr (and
were we even told that?) wouldn't necessarily mean that they wouldn't be
moved by *any* remedy, or that they couldn't have helped point toward a
remedy that might also have helped her...)

Best,
Shannon


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”