soroush writes:
It is my understanding that when one is affected by some diseases such as
Syph, Gon and Tub, it seems that it affects our genetic make up.
In other words it some how affects our DNA.
This is why you can see changes and traits being passed from one generation
to the other.
It is my unerstanding from the more recent developements by scientist who are advancing aspects of the allopathic paradigm, that the parts list of a specie, its genetic coding, presents alterations but not changes to it. It is this fact that allows for the historical tracing of our specie and of subgroups of it. There was a PBS program shown twice this year on the subject of the genome project.
It is my understanding as well that the function within an organism is determined by proteins; that their configuration is currently indeterminable; that in the absence of proteins there is no vital force.
A miasm then merely reflects a predisposition due to the susceptibility of the organism. I recall Dr. Little making asserting that the death of an organism will ultimately occur due to its chronic miasm. This raises the question in my mind whether chronic miasms are a necessary element for the existence of life as they ultimately are determinative of its death? It becomes a didactic presentation of life forces.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
miasms genetics proteins
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: miasms genetics proteins
on 11/13/02 7:51 AM, isali at isali@bellsouth.net wrote:
??? The function of an organism is determined by *many* things, and many
things are indispensible for life. Same can be said about sugars, starches,
fats, nutrients, enzymes, etc.
Maybe you're referring to the fact that genes apparently exert their
influence and accomplish their purpose thru guiding construction of enzymes
and other proteins, which then go on to create other structures and cause
other systems to be assembled?
Hmm... I do think it's fair to say that miasm = susceptibility (which =
predisposition?). If there were no susceptibility (i.e. to disease, injury,
or aging), then it seems there would be no death.
On the other hand, how would there be growth or learning, either?
Both come (or are recognized) about as result of interplay between self and
non-self..
Shannon
??? The function of an organism is determined by *many* things, and many
things are indispensible for life. Same can be said about sugars, starches,
fats, nutrients, enzymes, etc.
Maybe you're referring to the fact that genes apparently exert their
influence and accomplish their purpose thru guiding construction of enzymes
and other proteins, which then go on to create other structures and cause
other systems to be assembled?
Hmm... I do think it's fair to say that miasm = susceptibility (which =
predisposition?). If there were no susceptibility (i.e. to disease, injury,
or aging), then it seems there would be no death.
On the other hand, how would there be growth or learning, either?
Both come (or are recognized) about as result of interplay between self and
non-self..
Shannon