finishing of 3x family planning

[alpha_panthera1]

( my techn. system started behaving in strange ways, so I feared my
post was going to long, posted it quickly and have to finish in a
seperate one
)
--- In minutus@y..., jdurfeeathome@a... wrote:
else:
others
alternative
protect
No need to comment on that a second time. The difference is: The topic
itself is no doubt serious. The poster of the initial question,
probably a "she", may also have had a serious interest. But that was
my point: it was up to everyone's guess what may perhaps have been
intended, or not. If you read the other two replies to it, apart from
ours, there is also guessing "if she was thinking of...". And did it
help anyone to spend the time needed on these responses ? I had
mentioned myself that hom. can help in restoring fertility, had
previously written sth. on this on lyghtforce list, and could give
more detail. But why should I ? Was this wanted, or perhaps rather not
or what and why
?
Is it not to be expected from every poster on any
platform to get an impression first of how things are done there by
members, including in which style requests ( and it was one ) are
phrased etc. ? And at least to make clear what is wanted, if others
are to spend their time with it, which they were obviously supposed
to, or why otherwise do you post ? That sloppy one-liner, no name, no
intro, no thanks, no regards, no clarity, was lazy at best. I do
object to practically every "hom." list or forum that one can touch
upon to get messy sooner or later. You can expect a minimum of effort,
politeness, thoughtfullness and seriousness of everyone taking part,
or is that a sign of "closed-mindedness" or whatever is the most
fashionable term of shame in "homeo?"-circles nowadays ? It was only
reacting to this sort of thing that I ever got outspoken, twice here
and once on lf.list, and I still
would.
Yes, what you revealed about your methods in private consultation was
good. And what, please, would you have responded to her ( unless you
have done so in private exchange ) here ? Could you sense what was
wanted ? There may be some serious need of information, I am not
ruling that out. Why not the usual "I am looking for ... / need
for.../ is there any source / does anyone know ...?" that we all use
for our questions and requests ? Even if one is terribly shy or
something, can't one write "I am looking for inf. on-any sources" , "I
am new to h. and was wandering if..." or whatever ? No, I don't see
why one should take these 5 1/2 words piece serious in the form we got
it. Matter of basic standarts. Just fills up space. Obliges you to
read, because it could have been important, but waste it was. Or to
whose benefit? Different style, and it may have become different. May,
may, may, perhaps what ?
-
And when you scold me in public about my
insensitiveness ( no, you did, that was pretty obvious, don't deny
that ) I have to spend a good amount of time again on that; does
anyone profit from that ? You kicked me out of my schedule and
timetable, i.e. I kept a very polite and serious homoeo-medic-lady
waiting who requested
me on some other forum to explain Psora-things, and I have kept her
waiting time and again before finding the time to post the stuff I
have gathered, and wanted today, but no, endlessly on this
nonsense-mail again, and I have only limited access to onlining. Now I
am becoming the impolite
homoeo-communicator, you see ? I'd prefer to have a list without
annoyance.
Panthera