Dana Ullman's newest article at Huffingtonpost on Dysfunction at Wikipedia on Homeopathic Medicine

[Dana Ullman, MPH]

Friends,

My newest article was just published at the HuffPo. It is time that Wikipedia got OUTED for its misinformation on homeopathy and various natural therapeutics. I think that you'll find I've provided a strong & compelling case. Please consider sharing this article as much as possible via social media and expressing your concern about this issue in the comments section at the HuffPo.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullm ... 24226.html
--Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH
www.homeopathic.com

[Rachel]

this is great. thank you Dana.

________________________________

From: "'Dana Ullman, MPH' dullman@igc.org [minutus]"
To: Minutus ; Homeopathy
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 10:50 AM
Subject: [Minutus] Dana Ullman's newest article at Huffingtonpost on "Dysfunction at Wikipedia on Homeopathic Medicine"
Friends,

My newest article was just published at the HuffPo. It is time that Wikipedia got OUTED for its misinformation on homeopathy and various natural therapeutics. I think that you'll find I've provided a strong & compelling case. Please consider sharing this article as much as possible via social media and expressing your concern about this issue in the comments section at the HuffPo.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullm ... 24226.html

--Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH
www.homeopathic.com

[Mary Salvador]

Thank you Dana
I just shared this on Facebook....I recently got into a heated argument on FB about homeopathy, I can’t believe the arrogant academia’s stance on Homeopathy, they know nothing about it but still say it is bunk.....
Thank you for this article
Mary Salvador
________________________________

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.

[APEX PRECITECH]

I had chanced upon an article in wikipedia on some dating issue of the Mahabharata war and hence the entire Indian civilization. The author, seeing my edits, had erased them and posted a reply to me. From my corrspondence with him, I understood how the whole wikipedia works.

1. Facts or truths do not matter howsoever popular among a community.
2. The content quoted in wikipedia must be from 'reputed' writers on the subjects.

If , for example , 10 writers indulge in misinformation on homeopathy and only one genuine writer gives correct information, the wikipedia can report the nine and label homeopathy as a 'pseudoscience'.

The situation on the ground, as far as medicine is concerned, still remains as it was in Hahnemann's days- Created by opinions and supported by opinions.

By the way, wikipedia has articles on 'deductive' and 'inductive' reasoning I believe. Why don't they refer to them? I plan to write an article how Hahnemann might have chanced upon the core theory of Similars using the inductive reasoning. That might awaken the world so used to narrowing down on unlikely and wrong answers down the deductive route.

[Tamar Patti Schaeffer]

I also shared it to my Facebook page. Thank you Dana for all you do. Please let me know if you ever plan to get back down to Miami Florida area.

Sent from Samsung Note 2
All the best, Tamar Patti Schaeffer

[Tanya Marquette]

Not sure you are completely right.

First there is a way to get to all the comments posted, even when the most public venue has been erased.
Unfortunately, most people don’t/won’t do this.

Second, Wikipedia owners do have a personal bias against holistic medicine and they push their bias.
When such vehemence shows up on such major sites as Wikipedia, I always question their money source.
Big Pharma, Monsanto and other huge corporation with much to gain do fund these sites and cause major
prejudice to be sold to the public as ‘fact. The entire quack buster movement was a project of Big Pharma
We know how big Pharma ghost writes medical articles and pays doctors to put their name on them. We know
how Big Pharma pays doctors to speak at so-called professional events and support one drug or another.

For better or worse, Wikipedia has gained a reputation as the encyclopedia of choice online for millions of people
If they can be influence; i.e., bought off, it becomes a great marketing venue for whatever spin is desired.

t

[Roger B]

The immanent breakout of cold fusion will help to break the credibility back of Wikipedia and all other lame stream media outlets that have denied cold fusion for 25 years. Homeopathy and most other alternative health modalities are often difficult to prove and the mechanism is a mystery. But cold fusion is real and it will be a huge embarrassment for establishment physics and science in general.

Numerous articles at: http://www.e-catworld.com/

LENR is going to change our world in ways that we can't even imagine. Part of this revolution will be intellectual, epistemological, whether observation will be place back in to authority and theory will follow observation.
Sincerely,
Roger Bird
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com; homeopathy@homeolist.com
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 07:50:28 -0700
Subject: [Minutus] Dana Ullman's newest article at Huffingtonpost on "Dysfunction at Wikipedia on Homeopathic Medicine"

Friends,

My newest article was just published at the HuffPo. It is time that Wikipedia got OUTED for its misinformation on homeopathy and various natural therapeutics. I think that you'll find I've provided a strong & compelling case. Please consider sharing this article as much as possible via social media and expressing your concern about this issue in the comments section at the HuffPo.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullm ... 24226.html

--Dana Ullman, MPH, CCH
www.homeopathic.com
________________________________

Posted by: "Dana Ullman, MPH"