On Mar 17, 2014, at 1:08 AM, tamarque wrote:
On Friday late afternoon I received two "final judgements", with fines and cease and desist orders, the second to say that it "corrects" the first, by "adding a footnote". I also had to go to the post office depot out of town to get the documents, as they were sent postage due, so not delivered in the normal way. Cheek!
The footnote change said they had forgotten to consider my brief in making the judgement decision,
but that, had it been considered, it would not have changed the judgement.
Their explanation of the judegment references newly invented "facts" (they invent the facts differently each time I get paperwork) that demonstrably never happened - and references evidence they failed to supply, and state witnesses claims, which I was not given a chance to question or challenge and they are incorrect, it is not what the witnesses did or said - and the list of so-called justice and "facts" used goes on for thirteen pages.... a record low number (previously 40 to 160 page docs were invented).
We are still at the Administrative court level.
A relatively junior judge (Roman Dixon) granted summary judgement against me, claiming no disputed facts existed.
Amazing how he manages to see nothing I write and dispute.
We asked for a senior judge to vet that and that final order is what just arrived Friday...at least this time they admit they failed to consider my brief, and then adding a footnote so that technically it has been referenced.
(None of my arguments with their evidence, has ever been countered or even admitted to exist in any document from the court. There is NO counter-evidence, no state claim even makes sense logic-wise. The summary judgement has been handed down with zero supporting evidence for the state's invented supposed "uncontested facts". I would never have believed all this pack of invented state lies with zero suporting evidence could hold water, if I had not seen it with my own eyes. )
Tomorrow I apply for "judicial review" of the case and its final judgement, which, to be timely, must be mailed Monday!
(Clearly that lack of time to respond has been contrived all along, over Xmas, over Thanksgiving etc.)
After judicial review, (about which I am for some reason not holding my breath)
and assuming the level of "integrity" is shared there too, the options at Administrative court level will be exhausted, and next step becomes appeal to Superior Court.
It is a long tunnel....
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
was Cat issue
-
Tanya Marquette
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm
Re: was Cat issue
Oh Goddess—I feel your frustration and anger over this.
Justice is never blind!
t
From: Irene de Villiers
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 7:07 AM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] was Cat issue
On Friday late afternoon I received two "final judgements", with fines and cease and desist orders, the second to say that it "corrects" the first, by "adding a footnote". I also had to go to the post office depot out of town to get the documents, as they were sent postage due, so not delivered in the normal way. Cheek!
The footnote change said they had forgotten to consider my brief in making the judgement decision,
but that, had it been considered, it would not have changed the judgement.
Their explanation of the judegment references newly invented "facts" (they invent the facts differently each time I get paperwork) that demonstrably never happened - and references evidence they failed to supply, and state witnesses claims, which I was not given a chance to question or challenge and they are incorrect, it is not what the witnesses did or said - and the list of so-called justice and "facts" used goes on for thirteen pages.... a record low number (previously 40 to 160 page docs were invented).
We are still at the Administrative court level.
A relatively junior judge (Roman Dixon) granted summary judgement against me, claiming no disputed facts existed.
Amazing how he manages to see nothing I write and dispute.
We asked for a senior judge to vet that and that final order is what just arrived Friday...at least this time they admit they failed to consider my brief, and then adding a footnote so that technically it has been referenced.
(None of my arguments with their evidence, has ever been countered or even admitted to exist in any document from the court. There is NO counter-evidence, no state claim even makes sense logic-wise. The summary judgement has been handed down with zero supporting evidence for the state's invented supposed "uncontested facts". I would never have believed all this pack of invented state lies with zero suporting evidence could hold water, if I had not seen it with my own eyes. )
Tomorrow I apply for "judicial review" of the case and its final judgement, which, to be timely, must be mailed Monday!
(Clearly that lack of time to respond has been contrived all along, over Xmas, over Thanksgiving etc.)
After judicial review, (about which I am for some reason not holding my breath)
and assuming the level of "integrity" is shared there too, the options at Administrative court level will be exhausted, and next step becomes appeal to Superior Court.
It is a long tunnel....
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
Justice is never blind!
t
From: Irene de Villiers
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 7:07 AM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] was Cat issue
On Friday late afternoon I received two "final judgements", with fines and cease and desist orders, the second to say that it "corrects" the first, by "adding a footnote". I also had to go to the post office depot out of town to get the documents, as they were sent postage due, so not delivered in the normal way. Cheek!
The footnote change said they had forgotten to consider my brief in making the judgement decision,
but that, had it been considered, it would not have changed the judgement.
Their explanation of the judegment references newly invented "facts" (they invent the facts differently each time I get paperwork) that demonstrably never happened - and references evidence they failed to supply, and state witnesses claims, which I was not given a chance to question or challenge and they are incorrect, it is not what the witnesses did or said - and the list of so-called justice and "facts" used goes on for thirteen pages.... a record low number (previously 40 to 160 page docs were invented).
We are still at the Administrative court level.
A relatively junior judge (Roman Dixon) granted summary judgement against me, claiming no disputed facts existed.
Amazing how he manages to see nothing I write and dispute.
We asked for a senior judge to vet that and that final order is what just arrived Friday...at least this time they admit they failed to consider my brief, and then adding a footnote so that technically it has been referenced.
(None of my arguments with their evidence, has ever been countered or even admitted to exist in any document from the court. There is NO counter-evidence, no state claim even makes sense logic-wise. The summary judgement has been handed down with zero supporting evidence for the state's invented supposed "uncontested facts". I would never have believed all this pack of invented state lies with zero suporting evidence could hold water, if I had not seen it with my own eyes. )
Tomorrow I apply for "judicial review" of the case and its final judgement, which, to be timely, must be mailed Monday!
(Clearly that lack of time to respond has been contrived all along, over Xmas, over Thanksgiving etc.)
After judicial review, (about which I am for some reason not holding my breath)
and assuming the level of "integrity" is shared there too, the options at Administrative court level will be exhausted, and next step becomes appeal to Superior Court.
It is a long tunnel....
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."