Hi,
Dr Ramakrishnan got in touch with me today and asked if I would promote his next Cancer Seminar in UK . He uses his special “plussing “ technique for cancer cases. His prescribing is Hahnemann based as he will explain. I attended this seminar years ago and it is worthwhile but you do also need his book for more guidance in specific cases.
The link with the details and application forms is at http://welshconferenceofhomoeopathy.com/ and it is in August .
Rochelle Marsden MSc, RSHom, MNWCH, AAMET
EFT(Advanced) Practitioner
www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk
https://www.facebook.com/southporthomeopathicpractice
Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
-
healthinfo6
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:00 pm
Re: Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
According to this DVD blurb on Dr. Ramakrishnan's video interview about his plussing method for cancer:
He has employed this method with over 10,000 cancer patients to date. Using the plussing method, Dr. Ramakrishnan has more than doubled his rate of cure in cancer cases.
http://www.narayana-publishers.com/The- ... hnan/b7589
Yet, he needs to ask for help to promote his cancer seminar?
Wouldn't a homeopath with 10,000 cancer cases with double cancer cure rate be known around the world, with people banging down his door?
In this YouTube video from the DVD, does Dr. Ramakrishnan sound like or appear to have the body language confidence of a homeopath with double cure cancer rate?
Wouldn't you be a bit more enthusiastic and confident about CURING cancer vs. appearing like a deer in headlights?
Here are more details on his methods including homeoprophylaxsis for those with family cancer background, at the time the claim was 7000 cancer cases...
http://hpathy.com/homeopathy-papers/hom ... akrishnan/
Having been non-plussed by Dr. Rama's non-cancer casetaking, prescribing and followup style, or lack thereof, and 4th edition aggravations caused by his multiple repeating of heavy 200C dry doses, now at double prices when consulting in the USA, I may have accepted some of these incredible assertions at face value had I not been his patient, but I'm having a difficult time believing the stated quantity of them.
Where are all these cured cancer cases? How much time was given to each patient?
Maybe Rochelle, who actually spent time in a Dr. Ramakrishnan clinics, can attest to actually seeing cured cases of cancer or people with cancer looking for help.
Susan
He has employed this method with over 10,000 cancer patients to date. Using the plussing method, Dr. Ramakrishnan has more than doubled his rate of cure in cancer cases.
http://www.narayana-publishers.com/The- ... hnan/b7589
Yet, he needs to ask for help to promote his cancer seminar?
Wouldn't a homeopath with 10,000 cancer cases with double cancer cure rate be known around the world, with people banging down his door?
In this YouTube video from the DVD, does Dr. Ramakrishnan sound like or appear to have the body language confidence of a homeopath with double cure cancer rate?
Wouldn't you be a bit more enthusiastic and confident about CURING cancer vs. appearing like a deer in headlights?
Here are more details on his methods including homeoprophylaxsis for those with family cancer background, at the time the claim was 7000 cancer cases...
http://hpathy.com/homeopathy-papers/hom ... akrishnan/
Having been non-plussed by Dr. Rama's non-cancer casetaking, prescribing and followup style, or lack thereof, and 4th edition aggravations caused by his multiple repeating of heavy 200C dry doses, now at double prices when consulting in the USA, I may have accepted some of these incredible assertions at face value had I not been his patient, but I'm having a difficult time believing the stated quantity of them.
Where are all these cured cancer cases? How much time was given to each patient?
Maybe Rochelle, who actually spent time in a Dr. Ramakrishnan clinics, can attest to actually seeing cured cases of cancer or people with cancer looking for help.
Susan
Re: Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
Hi Susan,
We did see cancer patients in the clinic but it was not a clinic he worked at but a homeopathic school with a clinic and hospital. He did take a cancer case in front of us which was done the usual way and took an hour. We were not shown any of his cured cancer cases but the clinical practice we did in India was just that – it wasn’t meant to be a cancer clinic.
I do use Dr R’s protocol with patients and have never had anyone aggravate on it. I have used it with patients who have been operated on and the cancer has not returned. I am currently using it with someone who has other long term conditions and in the last year he has not got any worse and his consultants are quite happy with him – he is in his 80’s. I have used it with patients who have died BUT they had a good quality of life to the end and that is the bit I promote not a cure. I am sure there are homeopaths on this list who have used it more often than me and can report to you.
Rochelle
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of healthyinfo6@aol.com
Sent: 03 May 2013 09:47
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
According to this DVD blurb on Dr. Ramakrishnan's video interview about his plussing method for cancer:
He has employed this method with over 10,000 cancer patients to date. Using the plussing method, Dr. Ramakrishnan has more than doubled his rate of cure in cancer cases.
http://www.narayana-publishers.com/The- ... hnan/b7589
Yet, he needs to ask for help to promote his cancer seminar?
Wouldn't a homeopath with 10,000 cancer cases with double cancer cure rate be known around the world, with people banging down his door?
In this YouTube video from the DVD, does Dr. Ramakrishnan sound like or appear to have the body language confidence of a homeopath with double cure cancer rate?
Wouldn't you be a bit more enthusiastic and confident about CURING cancer vs. appearing like a deer in headlights?
Here are more details on his methods including homeoprophylaxsis for those with family cancer background, at the time the claim was 7000 cancer cases...
http://hpathy.com/homeopathy-papers/hom ... akrishnan/
Having been non-plussed by Dr. Rama's non-cancer casetaking, prescribing and followup style, or lack thereof, and 4th edition aggravations caused by his multiple repeating of heavy 200C dry doses, now at double prices when consulting in the USA, I may have accepted some of these incredible assertions at face value had I not been his patient, but I'm having a difficult time believing the stated quantity of them.
Where are all these cured cancer cases? How much time was given to each patient?
Maybe Rochelle, who actually spent time in a Dr. Ramakrishnan clinics, can attest to actually seeing cured cases of cancer or people with cancer looking for help.
Susan
We did see cancer patients in the clinic but it was not a clinic he worked at but a homeopathic school with a clinic and hospital. He did take a cancer case in front of us which was done the usual way and took an hour. We were not shown any of his cured cancer cases but the clinical practice we did in India was just that – it wasn’t meant to be a cancer clinic.
I do use Dr R’s protocol with patients and have never had anyone aggravate on it. I have used it with patients who have been operated on and the cancer has not returned. I am currently using it with someone who has other long term conditions and in the last year he has not got any worse and his consultants are quite happy with him – he is in his 80’s. I have used it with patients who have died BUT they had a good quality of life to the end and that is the bit I promote not a cure. I am sure there are homeopaths on this list who have used it more often than me and can report to you.
Rochelle
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of healthyinfo6@aol.com
Sent: 03 May 2013 09:47
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
According to this DVD blurb on Dr. Ramakrishnan's video interview about his plussing method for cancer:
He has employed this method with over 10,000 cancer patients to date. Using the plussing method, Dr. Ramakrishnan has more than doubled his rate of cure in cancer cases.
http://www.narayana-publishers.com/The- ... hnan/b7589
Yet, he needs to ask for help to promote his cancer seminar?
Wouldn't a homeopath with 10,000 cancer cases with double cancer cure rate be known around the world, with people banging down his door?
In this YouTube video from the DVD, does Dr. Ramakrishnan sound like or appear to have the body language confidence of a homeopath with double cure cancer rate?
Wouldn't you be a bit more enthusiastic and confident about CURING cancer vs. appearing like a deer in headlights?
Here are more details on his methods including homeoprophylaxsis for those with family cancer background, at the time the claim was 7000 cancer cases...
http://hpathy.com/homeopathy-papers/hom ... akrishnan/
Having been non-plussed by Dr. Rama's non-cancer casetaking, prescribing and followup style, or lack thereof, and 4th edition aggravations caused by his multiple repeating of heavy 200C dry doses, now at double prices when consulting in the USA, I may have accepted some of these incredible assertions at face value had I not been his patient, but I'm having a difficult time believing the stated quantity of them.
Where are all these cured cancer cases? How much time was given to each patient?
Maybe Rochelle, who actually spent time in a Dr. Ramakrishnan clinics, can attest to actually seeing cured cases of cancer or people with cancer looking for help.
Susan
-
Hennie Duits
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
Reading carefully what is being said, I'd say there is no mentioning of
any number of cured cases of cancer, right?
It *only* says the plussing method has more than doubled the cured cases.
So, if formerly, before plussing, there was one cured case, now, there
are more than two, and if, before plussing, there used to be one hundred
cured cases, now, there are more than two hundred.
So (maybe read again) there is no statement about any number of cases,
out of 10.000, being cured (apart from the fact that plussing 'doubled'
the 'previous' number).
Hennie
Op 3-5-2013 10:47, healthyinfo6@aol.com schreef:
any number of cured cases of cancer, right?
It *only* says the plussing method has more than doubled the cured cases.
So, if formerly, before plussing, there was one cured case, now, there
are more than two, and if, before plussing, there used to be one hundred
cured cases, now, there are more than two hundred.
So (maybe read again) there is no statement about any number of cases,
out of 10.000, being cured (apart from the fact that plussing 'doubled'
the 'previous' number).
Hennie
Op 3-5-2013 10:47, healthyinfo6@aol.com schreef:
-
Hennie Duits
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:00 pm
Re: Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
Probably, reading the contributions on this list, has significantly
improved my treatment results for a number of patients.
Let me rephrase that negatively (because that's just another way to read
it):
*Maybe*, reading the contributions on this list, has had *some* effect
on my treatment results for *one* patient.
Hennie
Op 4-5-2013 1:33, Hennie Duits schreef:
improved my treatment results for a number of patients.
Let me rephrase that negatively (because that's just another way to read
it):
*Maybe*, reading the contributions on this list, has had *some* effect
on my treatment results for *one* patient.
Hennie
Op 4-5-2013 1:33, Hennie Duits schreef:
Re: Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
Hi,
This doctor is little known in India for any cured cases
of cancer.
I am reminded of a doctor being ssked why he choose to be
a dermatologist by an interviewer. That doctor
(not Dr Ramakrishnan)gave very valid and astounding reasons,
that first of all the patients themselves don't expect any
overnight miracles, that the client loyalty for continued years
on treatment is ensured, that the doctor can claim credit for the smallest improvent if any in any case while he can throw the blame on the disease for the rest and most important of all is that
he can have undisturbed affairs in the night. But let me also
say that none of these may apply to this esteemed seminar giver.
V T Yekkirala
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, healthyinfo6@... wrote:
This doctor is little known in India for any cured cases
of cancer.
I am reminded of a doctor being ssked why he choose to be
a dermatologist by an interviewer. That doctor
(not Dr Ramakrishnan)gave very valid and astounding reasons,
that first of all the patients themselves don't expect any
overnight miracles, that the client loyalty for continued years
on treatment is ensured, that the doctor can claim credit for the smallest improvent if any in any case while he can throw the blame on the disease for the rest and most important of all is that
he can have undisturbed affairs in the night. But let me also
say that none of these may apply to this esteemed seminar giver.
V T Yekkirala
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, healthyinfo6@... wrote:
-
comdyne2002
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 11:00 pm
Re: Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
Everyone seeks a cure for cancer but very few ask what the disease actually is. Few doctors know as they are trained to treat only symptoms.
Most people think that a tumor is the cancer and if it is successfully removed and particles don't break off in the process, then a cure is possible. Really? As a backup precaution the "profession" adds chemotherapy to ensure that the deadly residue can somehow be knocked off. What is the real problem here? Come on folks, admit it. You know very well that no doctor has ever cured cancer. It ALWAYS comes back. It may be many years before it returns, but it will and when it does it comes back with a vengeance.
Once you know what cancer really is and how it comes about, it becomes obvious that the "profession" has no intention of ever curing it. Simply put, they make just too much money to kill the golden goose and thus be deprived of its golden eggs, ie., the revenue stream.
Cancer is a metabolic disorder! Think about that. What does "metabolic disorder" mean? What is means is deranged metabolism. The body is not efficiently burning its fuel. When the fuel is not fully consumed it leaves behind toxic ash which builds up and clogs the ventilation. Residue accumulates and displaces healthy tissue. The tissue becomes deprived of its primary fuel, oxygen, and the cells suffocate. Tissue begins to die and it rots in situ (in place). The body attempts to wall off the septic swamp now slugged up in excrement which cannot be efficiently hauled away. A cesspool is now the result and the induration evolves into the tumor.
Extirpating the tumor does not remove the cause for its formation and thus a new tumor will eventually reform at or very near the original site. Why? Because the metabolic cause of this chain reaction has not been properly addressed.
The ONLY way that cancer can be cured is by changing the environment in which it thrives. Diet and personal hygiene are the key.
Cancer has nothing to do with genes and everything to do with your living activities. You and YOU alone are responsible for its development in most cases and only YOU can cure your cancer. The cure is simple but you must commit to reversing the conditions that made you sick in the first place. There is no magic billet that will cure cancer. It takes work and a great deal of self-discipline. If you wan't to live, you MUST CLEAN UP YOUR ACT!!!
My new book: "Breast Cancer Cure? Absolutely!" covers the entire story. Every cancer is essentially the same and so its its cure. If you want to gain control over your destiny and be able to cure yourself, then this book is for you. The book is about all cancers, not just breast cancer. The section on breast cancer is astounding and those who have it will be amazed as to the unique method I developed quite by accident that has been so very effective in pulling breast tumors up to the skin surface where they dry up and literally fall off! I assure you, you will not be disappointed in spending a few dollars on a book that can save your life. There has never been a book written about cancer like this on. It is truly unique! Go to www.lulu.com/comdyne
Caveat Emptor! Carmi Hazen
Most people think that a tumor is the cancer and if it is successfully removed and particles don't break off in the process, then a cure is possible. Really? As a backup precaution the "profession" adds chemotherapy to ensure that the deadly residue can somehow be knocked off. What is the real problem here? Come on folks, admit it. You know very well that no doctor has ever cured cancer. It ALWAYS comes back. It may be many years before it returns, but it will and when it does it comes back with a vengeance.
Once you know what cancer really is and how it comes about, it becomes obvious that the "profession" has no intention of ever curing it. Simply put, they make just too much money to kill the golden goose and thus be deprived of its golden eggs, ie., the revenue stream.
Cancer is a metabolic disorder! Think about that. What does "metabolic disorder" mean? What is means is deranged metabolism. The body is not efficiently burning its fuel. When the fuel is not fully consumed it leaves behind toxic ash which builds up and clogs the ventilation. Residue accumulates and displaces healthy tissue. The tissue becomes deprived of its primary fuel, oxygen, and the cells suffocate. Tissue begins to die and it rots in situ (in place). The body attempts to wall off the septic swamp now slugged up in excrement which cannot be efficiently hauled away. A cesspool is now the result and the induration evolves into the tumor.
Extirpating the tumor does not remove the cause for its formation and thus a new tumor will eventually reform at or very near the original site. Why? Because the metabolic cause of this chain reaction has not been properly addressed.
The ONLY way that cancer can be cured is by changing the environment in which it thrives. Diet and personal hygiene are the key.
Cancer has nothing to do with genes and everything to do with your living activities. You and YOU alone are responsible for its development in most cases and only YOU can cure your cancer. The cure is simple but you must commit to reversing the conditions that made you sick in the first place. There is no magic billet that will cure cancer. It takes work and a great deal of self-discipline. If you wan't to live, you MUST CLEAN UP YOUR ACT!!!
My new book: "Breast Cancer Cure? Absolutely!" covers the entire story. Every cancer is essentially the same and so its its cure. If you want to gain control over your destiny and be able to cure yourself, then this book is for you. The book is about all cancers, not just breast cancer. The section on breast cancer is astounding and those who have it will be amazed as to the unique method I developed quite by accident that has been so very effective in pulling breast tumors up to the skin surface where they dry up and literally fall off! I assure you, you will not be disappointed in spending a few dollars on a book that can save your life. There has never been a book written about cancer like this on. It is truly unique! Go to www.lulu.com/comdyne
Caveat Emptor! Carmi Hazen
-
Jean Doherty
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
I feel his policy of using constitutional and an organ remedy is valid. I also like Grimmer's remedies for cancer. If add whatever seems right to diet modification feels helps. However perhaps the most one can say is well at the moment and remember to enjoy that moment, Jean
Re: Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
Susan,
Dr. Ramakrishnan's book, A Homeopathic Approach to Cancer, gives a breakdown of his pre- and post-plussing success rates according to the type of cancer.
I can understand why you're down on him -- his follow-up is lamentable, but that's probably due to being over-extended. His methods, however, do work, as a number of my patients can attest. I was even able to cure my own dog of lymphoma years ago using his protocol. Will Ramakrishnan's technique work in every cancer case? Of course not, any more than any other technique, alternative or allopathic, works in every case.
As for the world not beating a path to his door for cancer treatment, I can tell you that patients I've treated have been as thrilled with the results as they were appalled by the response of their doctors, which was to ignore or deny what homeopathy had done for them. When one patient tried to get a local cancer support group to give me a hearing, they refused on the grounds that it might "raise false hopes." I still shake my head in disbelief at that!
Peace,
Dale
Dr. Ramakrishnan's book, A Homeopathic Approach to Cancer, gives a breakdown of his pre- and post-plussing success rates according to the type of cancer.
I can understand why you're down on him -- his follow-up is lamentable, but that's probably due to being over-extended. His methods, however, do work, as a number of my patients can attest. I was even able to cure my own dog of lymphoma years ago using his protocol. Will Ramakrishnan's technique work in every cancer case? Of course not, any more than any other technique, alternative or allopathic, works in every case.
As for the world not beating a path to his door for cancer treatment, I can tell you that patients I've treated have been as thrilled with the results as they were appalled by the response of their doctors, which was to ignore or deny what homeopathy had done for them. When one patient tried to get a local cancer support group to give me a hearing, they refused on the grounds that it might "raise false hopes." I still shake my head in disbelief at that!
Peace,
Dale
-
Tanya Marquette
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm
Re: Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
Hopefully your patient will have learned something about the cognitive dissonance that is
operative amongst the medical profession and hostility of a medical industry hell bent on
controlling all health even when they can only do harm.
t
From: Dale Moss
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 5:32 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
Susan,
Dr. Ramakrishnan's book, A Homeopathic Approach to Cancer, gives a breakdown of his pre- and post-plussing success rates according to the type of cancer.
I can understand why you're down on him -- his follow-up is lamentable, but that's probably due to being over-extended. His methods, however, do work, as a number of my patients can attest. I was even able to cure my own dog of lymphoma years ago using his protocol. Will Ramakrishnan's technique work in every cancer case? Of course not, any more than any other technique, alternative or allopathic, works in every case.
As for the world not beating a path to his door for cancer treatment, I can tell you that patients I've treated have been as thrilled with the results as they were appalled by the response of their doctors, which was to ignore or deny what homeopathy had done for them. When one patient tried to get a local cancer support group to give me a hearing, they refused on the grounds that it might "raise false hopes." I still shake my head in disbelief at that!
Peace,
Dale
operative amongst the medical profession and hostility of a medical industry hell bent on
controlling all health even when they can only do harm.
t
From: Dale Moss
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2013 5:32 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Dr Ramakrishanan's Cancer Seminar.
Susan,
Dr. Ramakrishnan's book, A Homeopathic Approach to Cancer, gives a breakdown of his pre- and post-plussing success rates according to the type of cancer.
I can understand why you're down on him -- his follow-up is lamentable, but that's probably due to being over-extended. His methods, however, do work, as a number of my patients can attest. I was even able to cure my own dog of lymphoma years ago using his protocol. Will Ramakrishnan's technique work in every cancer case? Of course not, any more than any other technique, alternative or allopathic, works in every case.
As for the world not beating a path to his door for cancer treatment, I can tell you that patients I've treated have been as thrilled with the results as they were appalled by the response of their doctors, which was to ignore or deny what homeopathy had done for them. When one patient tried to get a local cancer support group to give me a hearing, they refused on the grounds that it might "raise false hopes." I still shake my head in disbelief at that!
Peace,
Dale