I am really fed up with all this criticism on homeopathy, especially when you consider the damage the medical establishment are responsible for. They have tried everything, haven't they, from it's a placebo to it's a con, it doesn't work, it's just sugar pills etc.etc. Now they have started on SH. Well, first of all, what do they mean "he's not qualified"? Not qualified in what? SH was a qualified doctor. He received the honourable title of Dr of Medicine in 1779, but he was disillusioned with the medical practice and said that people were worst off going to a doctor than had they not bothered. He sacrificed a lot giving up an established practice because it didn't work to look for something that did.
I suppose critics would say that back in those times doctors didn't have the knowledge that they now have. Well, bringing it more up to date, Luc De Schepper qualified as a doctor about 30 years ago. He, too, realised there had to be something better and after studying all aspects of alternative healing, believed homeopathy to be the best - and he hasn't looked back.
Also, SH in addition to studying Latin, Greek, Hebrew - and which he was able to speak fluently - studied history, physics and botany; his favourite study, though, was medical science.
For anyone who critictises SH, point them to the following link - http://www.homeoint.org/books4/bradford/index.htm
Here is one of the quotes "It was the effort of a single-minded and pure-hearted man to discover the truth in the manner that his father had long before taught him in this maxim:
" 'Never take anything for granted, nor receive anything in science as a truth until you have investigated it for yourself."
"During the year 1791, Hahnemann received honors from two important societies. He was elected a member of the Oekonomsche Gessellsehadt of Leipzig and also Fellow of the Academy of Sciences of Mayence.
"His discoveries in chemistry and his wonderful knowledge of medical subjects were attracting the attention of the scientific men of his time."
I think that speaks for itself.
In respect of religion, if that's the next step that critics will try to use to discredit SH and homeopathy, perhaps they should be pointed to the following link:
"Conclusion: Has science proven the existence of God?
If all this science is true, it would mean that science has proven the existence of a Creator (as well as intelligent design).
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038985_unive ... z2LFIf43HN"
Finally, there is a saying: "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you - and then you win."
Regards
Christine Wyndham-Thomas
www.homoeopathyclassical.com
Click Here!
Samuel Hahnemann
-
Kristy Lampe
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:00 pm
Re: Samuel Hahnemann
Thanks, Christine!
It is more important than ever to educate your clients about homeopathy, not just take the case and give them a remedy. Tell them how different it is, how it helps to heal, how it came to be, etc.
Talk to Rotary groups, mothers-day-out groups, and especially college/university student groups (for many of them, the first time they’ve ever been responsible for their own health care and they find out how expensive it is!). Tell them about homeopathy, and about resources available out there (yourself included!).
Keep up the good work, everyone...
Kristy
It is more important than ever to educate your clients about homeopathy, not just take the case and give them a remedy. Tell them how different it is, how it helps to heal, how it came to be, etc.
Talk to Rotary groups, mothers-day-out groups, and especially college/university student groups (for many of them, the first time they’ve ever been responsible for their own health care and they find out how expensive it is!). Tell them about homeopathy, and about resources available out there (yourself included!).
Keep up the good work, everyone...
Kristy
-
healthinfo6
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:00 pm
Re: Samuel Hahnemann
Reading this thread while watching Dr. Oz, who's recommending upto 4000mg of aspirin/day as needed, claiming it is a "miracle" drug while warning everyone that the highly used Tylenol/acetominophen can cause liver damage.
As I prep a new bottle of Tub LM6, I will succuss even more strongly thinking of how Hahnemann would have done so and wonder at how he became enlightened to use such a small medium as the poppy size pillule to deliver such a powerful healing force.
One theme I use when explaining homeopathic remedies used on myself or others to those who only know allopathic drugs as the be all end all...
I'm taking medication with over 200 years knowledge and experience of usage, how many years has has this drug been used?? And what are those possible "side" effects?
Susan
As I prep a new bottle of Tub LM6, I will succuss even more strongly thinking of how Hahnemann would have done so and wonder at how he became enlightened to use such a small medium as the poppy size pillule to deliver such a powerful healing force.
One theme I use when explaining homeopathic remedies used on myself or others to those who only know allopathic drugs as the be all end all...
I'm taking medication with over 200 years knowledge and experience of usage, how many years has has this drug been used?? And what are those possible "side" effects?
Susan
-
Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Samuel Hahnemann
My Bedouin cousins have a great saying: "The dogs are barking, the caravan moves on"......
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com
I am really fed up with all this criticism on homeopathy, especially when you consider the damage the medical establishment are responsible for. They have tried everything, haven't they, from it's a placebo to it's a con, it doesn't work, it's just sugar pills etc.etc. Now they have started on SH. Well, first of all, what do they mean "he's not qualified"? Not qualified in what? SH was a qualified doctor. He received the honourable title of Dr of Medicine in 1779, but he was disillusioned with the medical practice and said that people were worst off going to a doctor than had they not bothered. He sacrificed a lot giving up an established practice because it didn't work to look for something that did.
I suppose critics would say that back in those times doctors didn't have the knowledge that they now have. Well, bringing it more up to date, Luc De Schepper qualified as a doctor about 30 years ago. He, too, realised there had to be something better and after studying all aspects of alternative healing, believed homeopathy to be the best - and he hasn't looked back.
Also, SH in addition to studying Latin, Greek, Hebrew - and which he was able to speak fluently - studied history, physics and botany; his favourite study, though, was medical science.
For anyone who critictises SH, point them to the following link - http://www.homeoint.org/books4/bradford/index.htm
Here is one of the quotes "It was the effort of a single-minded and pure-hearted man to discover the truth in the manner that his father had long before taught him in this maxim:
" 'Never take anything for granted, nor receive anything in science as a truth until you have investigated it for yourself."
"During the year 1791, Hahnemann received honors from two important societies. He was elected a member of the Oekonomsche Gessellsehadt of Leipzig and also Fellow of the Academy of Sciences of Mayence.
"His discoveries in chemistry and his wonderful knowledge of medical subjects were attracting the attention of the scientific men of his time."
I think that speaks for itself.
In respect of religion, if that's the next step that critics will try to use to discredit SH and homeopathy, perhaps they should be pointed to the following link:
"Conclusion: Has science proven the existence of God?
If all this science is true, it would mean that science has proven the existence of a Creator (as well as intelligent design).
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038985_unive ... z2LFIf43HN"
Finally, there is a saying: "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you - and then you win."
Regards
Christine Wyndham-Thomas
www.homoeopathyclassical.com
Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com
I am really fed up with all this criticism on homeopathy, especially when you consider the damage the medical establishment are responsible for. They have tried everything, haven't they, from it's a placebo to it's a con, it doesn't work, it's just sugar pills etc.etc. Now they have started on SH. Well, first of all, what do they mean "he's not qualified"? Not qualified in what? SH was a qualified doctor. He received the honourable title of Dr of Medicine in 1779, but he was disillusioned with the medical practice and said that people were worst off going to a doctor than had they not bothered. He sacrificed a lot giving up an established practice because it didn't work to look for something that did.
I suppose critics would say that back in those times doctors didn't have the knowledge that they now have. Well, bringing it more up to date, Luc De Schepper qualified as a doctor about 30 years ago. He, too, realised there had to be something better and after studying all aspects of alternative healing, believed homeopathy to be the best - and he hasn't looked back.
Also, SH in addition to studying Latin, Greek, Hebrew - and which he was able to speak fluently - studied history, physics and botany; his favourite study, though, was medical science.
For anyone who critictises SH, point them to the following link - http://www.homeoint.org/books4/bradford/index.htm
Here is one of the quotes "It was the effort of a single-minded and pure-hearted man to discover the truth in the manner that his father had long before taught him in this maxim:
" 'Never take anything for granted, nor receive anything in science as a truth until you have investigated it for yourself."
"During the year 1791, Hahnemann received honors from two important societies. He was elected a member of the Oekonomsche Gessellsehadt of Leipzig and also Fellow of the Academy of Sciences of Mayence.
"His discoveries in chemistry and his wonderful knowledge of medical subjects were attracting the attention of the scientific men of his time."
I think that speaks for itself.
In respect of religion, if that's the next step that critics will try to use to discredit SH and homeopathy, perhaps they should be pointed to the following link:
"Conclusion: Has science proven the existence of God?
If all this science is true, it would mean that science has proven the existence of a Creator (as well as intelligent design).
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038985_unive ... z2LFIf43HN"
Finally, there is a saying: "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you - and then you win."
Regards
Christine Wyndham-Thomas
www.homoeopathyclassical.com
Re: Samuel Hahnemann
Susan,
As you no doubt know (judging by your quotation marks) there is no such thing as a "side effect". There is only cause and effect. The term "side effects" was coined by the pharma industry in order to mislead and blindside the ignorant public who know little about chemistry and physics. It is a "feel-good" term that lulls people into thinking that what they are experiencing from the consumption, actions, and interactions of the drugs they are taking are really just minor, common, mostly benevolent symptoms of no consequence for the most part, since they are really "just side effects" and to be expected. Right! And anyone who believes that is also living in the land of Santa Claus, Easter bunnies, Unicorns and other misleading feel-good fairytales that have no basis in truth.
Thank you for bringing this up. I enjoyed your post.
Agi
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, healthyinfo6@... wrote:
As you no doubt know (judging by your quotation marks) there is no such thing as a "side effect". There is only cause and effect. The term "side effects" was coined by the pharma industry in order to mislead and blindside the ignorant public who know little about chemistry and physics. It is a "feel-good" term that lulls people into thinking that what they are experiencing from the consumption, actions, and interactions of the drugs they are taking are really just minor, common, mostly benevolent symptoms of no consequence for the most part, since they are really "just side effects" and to be expected. Right! And anyone who believes that is also living in the land of Santa Claus, Easter bunnies, Unicorns and other misleading feel-good fairytales that have no basis in truth.
Thank you for bringing this up. I enjoyed your post.
Agi
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, healthyinfo6@... wrote:
-
LabelGMOFlorida
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 5:16 pm
Re: Samuel Hahnemann
Don't be diss in' on Santa. Without Santa the world would be a sadder place.
Vicki
Sent from my Kyocera Rise
szokia wrote:
Susan,
As you no doubt know (judging by your quotation marks) there is no such thing as a "side effect". There is only cause and effect. The term "side effects" was coined by the pharma industry in order to mislead and blindside the ignorant public who know little about chemistry and physics. It is a "feel-good" term that lulls people into thinking that what they are experiencing from the consumption, actions, and interactions of the drugs they are taking are really just minor, common, mostly benevolent symptoms of no consequence for the most part, since they are really "just side effects" and to be expected. Right! And anyone who believes that is also living in the land of Santa Claus, Easter bunnies, Unicorns and other misleading feel-good fairytales that have no basis in truth.
Thank you for bringing this up. I enjoyed your post.
Agi
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , healthyinfo6@... wrote:
Vicki
Sent from my Kyocera Rise
szokia wrote:
Susan,
As you no doubt know (judging by your quotation marks) there is no such thing as a "side effect". There is only cause and effect. The term "side effects" was coined by the pharma industry in order to mislead and blindside the ignorant public who know little about chemistry and physics. It is a "feel-good" term that lulls people into thinking that what they are experiencing from the consumption, actions, and interactions of the drugs they are taking are really just minor, common, mostly benevolent symptoms of no consequence for the most part, since they are really "just side effects" and to be expected. Right! And anyone who believes that is also living in the land of Santa Claus, Easter bunnies, Unicorns and other misleading feel-good fairytales that have no basis in truth.
Thank you for bringing this up. I enjoyed your post.
Agi
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , healthyinfo6@... wrote:
-
Lucy De Pieri
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:00 pm
Re: Samuel Hahnemann
The reaction of big pharma on the blooming of homeopathy, is just fear. They will try all sorts of things to defend themselves, they are already loosing a lot of money in not selling flu vaccines for example. After the Bird flu fiasco, the general public is starting to see through the smoke and screens, have voted with they feet and refused to roll up the sleeves, this year. A lot of my patients decided not to have the flu vaccines and they noticed that they feel better, because they did not get sick this year. Their constitutional remedy supported them, so far so good.
We don't even have to justify how and why homeopathy work, because it works, period. Have you ever heard your MD justifying s/he prescribed a medication? Or explaining to you how it works? No, so why should we?
Educating the public is very important, but I feel even more important is to the best homeopath we can be, as I know the rest will look after itself.
I used to get very upset and angry, at the attacks in the past, so much I needed to get a remedy! Now I don't pay much attention to what they are doing now, my focus is to be the best homeopath I can be, always ready to go the extra mile or two in order to find the simillimum for my patient, always learning more, that is my focus.
So, although it can be frustrating and maddening, I don't do that anymore, I use my energy in the more positive way possible. This is what I thought to be the right way to respond to attacks to homeopathy by people that have no clue about what they are talking about it.
Just remember that in over 200 year, there has been not a single remedy recall, it is a statement that is not only impressive but true. Now how many medicines have been recalled even in the last 5 years?
Let then stew in their negativity, karma will get them, sooner or later
Lucy
Lucy De Pieri PhD, DCH
________________________________
From: szokia
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:35 PM
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Samuel Hahnemann
Susan,
As you no doubt know (judging by your quotation marks) there is no such thing as a "side effect". There is only cause and effect. The term "side effects" was coined by the pharma industry in order to mislead and blindside the ignorant public who know little about chemistry and physics. It is a "feel-good" term that lulls people into thinking that what they are experiencing from the consumption, actions, and interactions of the drugs they are taking are really just minor, common, mostly benevolent symptoms of no consequence for the most part, since they are really "just side effects" and to be expected. Right! And anyone who believes that is also living in the land of Santa Claus, Easter bunnies, Unicorns and other misleading feel-good fairytales that have no basis in truth.
Thank you for bringing this up. I enjoyed your post.
Agi
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , healthyinfo6@... wrote:
We don't even have to justify how and why homeopathy work, because it works, period. Have you ever heard your MD justifying s/he prescribed a medication? Or explaining to you how it works? No, so why should we?
Educating the public is very important, but I feel even more important is to the best homeopath we can be, as I know the rest will look after itself.
I used to get very upset and angry, at the attacks in the past, so much I needed to get a remedy! Now I don't pay much attention to what they are doing now, my focus is to be the best homeopath I can be, always ready to go the extra mile or two in order to find the simillimum for my patient, always learning more, that is my focus.
So, although it can be frustrating and maddening, I don't do that anymore, I use my energy in the more positive way possible. This is what I thought to be the right way to respond to attacks to homeopathy by people that have no clue about what they are talking about it.
Just remember that in over 200 year, there has been not a single remedy recall, it is a statement that is not only impressive but true. Now how many medicines have been recalled even in the last 5 years?
Let then stew in their negativity, karma will get them, sooner or later
Lucy
Lucy De Pieri PhD, DCH
________________________________
From: szokia
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:35 PM
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Samuel Hahnemann
Susan,
As you no doubt know (judging by your quotation marks) there is no such thing as a "side effect". There is only cause and effect. The term "side effects" was coined by the pharma industry in order to mislead and blindside the ignorant public who know little about chemistry and physics. It is a "feel-good" term that lulls people into thinking that what they are experiencing from the consumption, actions, and interactions of the drugs they are taking are really just minor, common, mostly benevolent symptoms of no consequence for the most part, since they are really "just side effects" and to be expected. Right! And anyone who believes that is also living in the land of Santa Claus, Easter bunnies, Unicorns and other misleading feel-good fairytales that have no basis in truth.
Thank you for bringing this up. I enjoyed your post.
Agi
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , healthyinfo6@... wrote:
Re: Samuel Hahnemann
You make some great Points Lucy. Best Wishes Domenic
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
-
JULIE GRIFFITHS
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:00 pm
Re: Samuel Hahnemann
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-20002094
Jeremy Hunt, the current UK Health minister, is pro-homeopathy so it's not all bad news.
________________________________
From: Dom
To: "minutus@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2013, 0:51
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Samuel Hahnemann
You make some great Points Lucy. Best Wishes Domenic
________________________________
________________________________
Jeremy Hunt, the current UK Health minister, is pro-homeopathy so it's not all bad news.
________________________________
From: Dom
To: "minutus@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Tuesday, 19 February 2013, 0:51
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Samuel Hahnemann
You make some great Points Lucy. Best Wishes Domenic
________________________________
________________________________