Dave:
You wrote:
enlightenment
-
Dave Hartley
- Posts: 992
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2020 3:47 pm
Re: enlightenment
LISA utters:
"This unfortunately,Dave is your way of trying to undermine something that
you
cannot get a handle on."
------------
No, Lisa- as I said: it is a common perception held by a number of
Homeopaths who are casual observers of self-styled "students of Sehgal
method."
Amusingly enough, it features very strongly in your communication here re:
Sehgal, as well as your communication a couple of years ago on another
homeopathy egroup.
LISA again:
"it is totality it is the disposition of the person."
-----------
So, you are saying that you are prescribing based upon the disposition-
which you term "totality" because it run through the whole of the persons
case?"
There is nothing pathological in desire for enlightenment (rather the
reverse.)
"Desire for light" remains the opposite of photophobia, for 99.9% of
homeopaths.
Suggest you try rubrics which actually reflect quasi-pathological (what
needs to be cured?) symptoms instead of free-allegorization of rubrics
designed to represent (by mental contortions) the "disposition of the
person." -As I understand it, this is precisely the aspect of
(neo)"so-called-classical" homeopathy which Sehgal objects to; that of not
seeing what is to be cured, and instead focussing on non-pathological
generalities of the person.
Sehgal's disgust for that type of treatment of "remedy picture"
"constitution" is what drove him to formulate his "method" isn't it?
Dave Hartley
http://www.localcomputermart.com
Santa Cruz, CA (831)423-4284
Tri-Cities Computer (TN) |Asheville Computer (NC)
423-952-0983 or 877-245-3362 |(828)285-0240
$9.95 internet http://www.federalisp.com/?page=ispsignup
"This unfortunately,Dave is your way of trying to undermine something that
you
cannot get a handle on."
------------
No, Lisa- as I said: it is a common perception held by a number of
Homeopaths who are casual observers of self-styled "students of Sehgal
method."
Amusingly enough, it features very strongly in your communication here re:
Sehgal, as well as your communication a couple of years ago on another
homeopathy egroup.
LISA again:
"it is totality it is the disposition of the person."
-----------
So, you are saying that you are prescribing based upon the disposition-
which you term "totality" because it run through the whole of the persons
case?"
There is nothing pathological in desire for enlightenment (rather the
reverse.)
"Desire for light" remains the opposite of photophobia, for 99.9% of
homeopaths.
Suggest you try rubrics which actually reflect quasi-pathological (what
needs to be cured?) symptoms instead of free-allegorization of rubrics
designed to represent (by mental contortions) the "disposition of the
person." -As I understand it, this is precisely the aspect of
(neo)"so-called-classical" homeopathy which Sehgal objects to; that of not
seeing what is to be cured, and instead focussing on non-pathological
generalities of the person.
Sehgal's disgust for that type of treatment of "remedy picture"
"constitution" is what drove him to formulate his "method" isn't it?
Dave Hartley
http://www.localcomputermart.com
Santa Cruz, CA (831)423-4284
Tri-Cities Computer (TN) |Asheville Computer (NC)
423-952-0983 or 877-245-3362 |(828)285-0240
$9.95 internet http://www.federalisp.com/?page=ispsignup