It's not one problem -it's an urgent need for preventing a number of
problems in an acute situation.
>
Lucky break - I've seen that fail. Also seen any other two fail.
I've never seen the combination fail - nor in emergency (since the
symptoms fit) does it ever cause a proving symptom.
So if you want a certain fix - this works.
If you prefer not to use it, that is your prerogative.
A freaked out cat at a cat show can do some serious harm - and it needs
some serious attention to prevent serious consequences. It's not worth
fooling around, trying to see if a bit less might help.
There has never been an aggravation - nor a need for other treatment (in
many many cases over several generations - the protocol is one that has
been handed down) - and that is good enough for me.
The idea is weight the pros and cons and the risks:
* to do no harm..... Too little remedy does a LOT of harm in a cat bite
situation; better to err on the side of safety;
* to cure... too little remedy will result in severe problems and a need
to run after consequences that should/could have been prevented.
This is very different from a minor scratch or some such where you can
apply a little remedy and add more if it does not work. Cat bites put
serious germs right into the blood stream in a closed puncture wound.
>
I've yet to see a cat bite with Arn or Bell-per symptoms.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."