Sac-lac--Hahnemannian? [was: combos

[Shannon Nelson]

On May 15, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Richard Shannon wrote:
Ah, a fun question! Evidently Hahnemann used plenty of it himself, but
hm, where is that in the Organon..... Joy, anyone?

[Carol Boyce]

Well he mentions use of placebo in Aph 91 and 96 in relation to case taking and specifically mentions 'sugar of milk' in a placebo context in Aph 281 when talking about admin of medicines - so it's definitely in there! As for the debate Classical v Hahnemannian I leave that to you

Carol

Carol Boyce, MCH, CCH, RSHom (NA)
Director of Education
The Homeopathic Symposium
www.homeopathicsymposium.com
--

[Teresa Kramer]

If you mean where is Sac-lac in Dr. Hahnemann’s work, it is for sure in the Paris Casebooks (in as far as I have seen bits of them via Dr. Luc or Dr. Little) over and over, is it not? AFAIK, they are written in French and German, so not just anyone can read them, unfortunately. Teresa (Northern VA USA)
________________________________

From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Robert & Shannon Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:39 AM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Sac-lac--Hahnemannian? [was: Re: combos
[...]
I guess this raises another question: Is Sac-lac
Classical or Hahnemannian?
Ah, a fun question! Evidently Hahnemann used plenty of it himself, but hm, where is that in the Organon..... Joy, anyone?

[Shannon Nelson]

Thanks Carol!
I should have remembered that...

[McPhee Family]

According to Roger Morrison, Saccharum Lacticum was proven by Swan (11 provers) in 1888 showing it is not inert at all when potentized. It was proved again by Fink in 1890 and yet again by MacFarlan in 1893. See Organic and Hydrocarbon Remedies for homeopathic picture.
Truly,
Erica