homeopathy mentioned in New Scientist article

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Sara Klein Ridgley, Ph.D.
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2001 10:00 pm

homeopathy mentioned in New Scientist article

Post by Sara Klein Ridgley, Ph.D. »

http://space.newscientist.com/article.n ... 524911.600

4 Belfast homeopathy results MADELEINE Ennis, a pharmacologist at Queen's
University, Belfast, was the scourge of homeopathy. She railed against its
claims that a chemical remedy could be diluted to the point where a sample
was unlikely to contain a single molecule of anything but water, and yet
still have a healing effect. Until, that is, she set out to prove once and
for all that homeopathy was bunkum.

In her most recent paper, Ennis describes how her team looked at the effects
of ultra-dilute solutions of histamine on human white blood cells involved
in inflammation. These "basophils" release histamine when the cells are
under attack. Once released, the histamine stops them releasing any more.
The study, replicated in four different labs, found that homeopathic
solutions - so dilute that they probably didn't contain a single histamine
molecule - worked just like histamine. Ennis might not be happy with the
homeopaths' claims, but she admits that an effect cannot be ruled out.

So how could it happen? Homeopaths prepare their remedies by dissolving
things like charcoal, deadly nightshade or spider venom in ethanol, and then
diluting this "mother tincture" in water again and again. No matter what the
level of dilution, homeopaths claim, the original remedy leaves some kind of
imprint on the water molecules. Thus, however dilute the solution becomes,
it is still imbued with the properties of the remedy.

You can understand why Ennis remains sceptical. And it remains true that no
homeopathic remedy has ever been shown to work in a large randomised
placebo-controlled clinical trial. But the Belfast study (Inflammation
Research, vol 53, p 181) suggests that something is going on. "We are,"
Ennis says in her paper, "unable to explain our findings and are reporting
them to encourage others to investigate this phenomenon." If the results
turn out to be real, she says, the implications are profound: we may have to
rewrite physics and chemistry.
Œ
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Ruby
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

Re: homeopathy mentioned in New Scientist article

Post by Ruby »

http://space.newscientist.com/article.n ... 524911.600

4 Belfast homeopathy results
MADELEINE Ennis, a pharmacologist at Queen's University, Belfast, was the
scourge of homeopathy. She railed against its claims that a chemical remedy
could be diluted to the point where a sample was unlikely to contain a
single molecule of anything but water, and yet still have a healing effect.
Until, that is, she set out to prove once and for all that homeopathy was
bunkum.

In her most recent paper, Ennis describes how her team looked at the effects
of ultra-dilute solutions of histamine on human white blood cells involved
in inflammation. These "basophils" release histamine when the cells are
under attack. Once released, the histamine stops them releasing any more.
The study, replicated in four different labs, found that homeopathic
solutions - so dilute that they probably didn't contain a single histamine
molecule - worked just like histamine. Ennis might not be happy with the
homeopaths' claims, but she admits that an effect cannot be ruled out.

So how could it happen? Homeopaths prepare their remedies by dissolving
things like charcoal, deadly nightshade or spider venom in ethanol, and then
diluting this "mother tincture" in water again and again. No matter what the
level of dilution, homeopaths claim, the original remedy leaves some kind of
imprint on the water molecules. Thus, however dilute the solution becomes,
it is still imbued with the properties of the remedy.

You can understand why Ennis remains sceptical. And it remains true that no
homeopathic remedy has ever been shown to work in a large randomised
placebo-controlled clinical trial. But the Belfast study (Inflammation
Research, vol 53, p 181) suggests that something is going on. "We are,"
Ennis says in her paper, "unable to explain our findings and are reporting
them to encourage others to investigate this phenomenon." If the results
turn out to be real, she says, the implications are profound: we may have to
rewrite physics and chemistry.
=======================================================

A Joyous Noel to You and Yours!
Health, Hope, Joy & Healing :
May you Prosper, even as your Soul Prospers 3John 2

Jennifer Ruby

Email advice is not a substitute for medical treatment.

http://www.rubysemporium.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SymphonicHealth
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Therapeutic-Laser_Therapy
http://www.lazrpulsr.com
______________________________________________
«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”