Rife & Pleomorphism - A Faulty Medical Model: The Germ Theory

[Shannon M]

On Wednesday, October 25, 2006, at 07:53 AM, Sheri Nakken wrote:
It would certainly have to be both!
As you say, if conditions are not right, the pathogens cannot live or
multiply. And what *constitutes* "right" conditions depends on various
things; for some viruses (and other pathogens), simply a healthy immune
system is quite enough to prevent them from thriving. But some are
virulent enough that "good health" is not sufficient. (And even those
who are generally "healthy" may have their off-days.)

So--of course it is both.

Hmmmm.... Well, how does a virus reproduce? It cannot reproduce
independently, so it reproduces by hijacking another cell--no doubt
bacteria sometimes serve this role. Is there anything to suggest he
was seeing something other than that?

Re Rife's and Enderlein's ideas about organisms changing form, from
benign to harmful according to the environment (chemical and/or
energetic)--it's extremely interesting, isn't it! But even if we take
that as true (and i think there is good evidence of it in some
circumstances), why try to make the leap from "things can change state"
to "nothing can hurt you unless it's come from within you and changed
state"? Even if we say, okay, salmonella can form from within, without
any outside infection (and I am not *assuming* that was a correct
observation), it seems to me a badly flawed leap of logic, to say that
eating an extra dose of pre-formed salmonella will not be harmful...
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]