medical studies designed to fail, was: science of homeopathy
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:48 pm
Shannon and all,
I'm sure it was 40 IU, knowing how conventional medical/nutritional research
is often done. It is like the Vitamin C for cancer study Mayo did 15 or 20
years ago that showed the Vitamin C wasn't effective with cancer. They used
the Vitamin C RDA of 80 mg, which is just enough to keep you from displaying
clinical scurvy symptoms. That study was designed to fail and "prove" that
Vitamin C is ineffective with cancer.
The other thing about the Vitamin E study was that it didn't use natural
Vitamin E, the d-tocopherol. That substance the body is programmed to
metabolize.
The much cheaper synthetic Vitamin E, the dl-tocopherol, is NOT what the
body is designed to metabolize. So of course it will degrade the body's
functions, rather than enhance them.
So read the studies, as Steve S suggests, to decode the researchers biases
and shenanigans.
Blessings,
Marybeth
In a message dated 8/22/2006 2:19:34 P.M. Central Standard Time,
shannonnelson@tds.net writes:
Donna, that's amazing!
On a slightly less amusing note I recall one which "proved" that
vitamin E does not prevent heart disease. The daily dose they used to
"prove" this was 40 IU. Could it have been a typo? I'd like to think
so, but who knows? And even 400IU is I believe only considered a
moderate dose. But to a casual reader (or someone who read only the
abstract; or someone unfamiliar with therapeutic dosages) I suppose it
would have looked convincing.
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Visit Minutus Website at http://www.minutus.org
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and
educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding
the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or
advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email
postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains
with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual
members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or
other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, you can simply change your
setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a single daily
digest.
Yahoo! Groups Links
Marybeth Buchele RSHom(NA) CCH*
Professional Homeopath
dba Health Naturally Homeopathy Services
3601 Park Center Blvd. Suite 305
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
952-933-6068
_www.healthnaturally.biz_ (http://www.healthnaturally.biz/)
Natural Health for Mind and Body
*Registered with The Society of Homeopaths, North America,
Certified in Classical Homeopathy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I'm sure it was 40 IU, knowing how conventional medical/nutritional research
is often done. It is like the Vitamin C for cancer study Mayo did 15 or 20
years ago that showed the Vitamin C wasn't effective with cancer. They used
the Vitamin C RDA of 80 mg, which is just enough to keep you from displaying
clinical scurvy symptoms. That study was designed to fail and "prove" that
Vitamin C is ineffective with cancer.
The other thing about the Vitamin E study was that it didn't use natural
Vitamin E, the d-tocopherol. That substance the body is programmed to
metabolize.
The much cheaper synthetic Vitamin E, the dl-tocopherol, is NOT what the
body is designed to metabolize. So of course it will degrade the body's
functions, rather than enhance them.
So read the studies, as Steve S suggests, to decode the researchers biases
and shenanigans.
Blessings,
Marybeth
In a message dated 8/22/2006 2:19:34 P.M. Central Standard Time,
shannonnelson@tds.net writes:
Donna, that's amazing!
On a slightly less amusing note I recall one which "proved" that
vitamin E does not prevent heart disease. The daily dose they used to
"prove" this was 40 IU. Could it have been a typo? I'd like to think
so, but who knows? And even 400IU is I believe only considered a
moderate dose. But to a casual reader (or someone who read only the
abstract; or someone unfamiliar with therapeutic dosages) I suppose it
would have looked convincing.
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Visit Minutus Website at http://www.minutus.org
ATTENTION PLEASE:
The Minutus Group is established purely for the promotion of Homoeopathy and
educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations regarding
the individual suitability of the information contained in any document read or
advice or recommendation offered which appears on this website and/or email
postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out of their use remains
with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site or its individual
members be liable for any direct, consequential, incidental, special, punitive or
other damages whatsoever and howsoever caused.
****
ATTENTION PLEASE!!
If you do not wish to receive individual emails, you can simply change your
setting at http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a single daily
digest.
Yahoo! Groups Links
Marybeth Buchele RSHom(NA) CCH*
Professional Homeopath
dba Health Naturally Homeopathy Services
3601 Park Center Blvd. Suite 305
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
952-933-6068
_www.healthnaturally.biz_ (http://www.healthnaturally.biz/)
Natural Health for Mind and Body
*Registered with The Society of Homeopaths, North America,
Certified in Classical Homeopathy
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]