Yes I am talking about decades old!
.eg. a chap who been in pain since he broke both ankles years
before jumping from a loft onto what he thought was straw bales, but
it was a light covering of a hole, he had an extra 16 feet to go! One
of the first cases i treated - so it was a decade ago for me too! lol
if I remember right he got symphytum 50M did the trick in no time at
all
Another had been in a car acc and didn't come for treatment until his
court case was finished which took 5 yrs -so not a decade - half a
decade - he was in pain from broken leg and hip
Another had had surgery to remove ( i remember right) a disk in her
back yrs before, was still in pain ( I remember she got NM6 tds, I
prescribed that because she seemed very NM'ish to me, worked like a
charm..- worked like homeopathy!;-))
Others I remember in similar vein, not all decades of injury but some
were and some just years. Most of the sport injuries have certainly
been over a year or two as they usually diudn't try homeopathy
until they'd tried everything else ,but I don't find there's any
difference in treatment because of the age of the complaint. The only
thing that I find does make a difference ids the age of the patient.
The important point about 'decades old' structural damage is not
whether it was long ago but whether it has changed since the injury
itself over time. i.e. has there been additional structural changes
over those years? If so that has to be addressed (obviously)
Frankly I do find (touch wood) that this type of condition is easier
to treat than some others, simply because the remedy is usually
clearly indicated
Simon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
