Minutus

Given that most people are too acidic, and most people do one dimensional thinking ("good cholesterol", "bad cholesterol", etc.), it is no surprise that people talk about alkalizing all of the time and don't talk about balancing pH. I believe that the ideal pH is 7.35 or 7.4

Roger
________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:04:31 -0700
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Radiation treatment
That would be dangerous.

Neutralize the pH to the optimal one which is a little - not a lot - above 7.
People with metabolic alkalosis and cancer need ACID.

You can not just go about blindly alkalizing.

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

In a message dated 8/17/2014 3:02:43 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
JB: Clarke, a medical doctor, is the author of the world's most comprehensive, well organized materia medica and the only one recognized by the FDA. He has been my guiding light in case after case. I always refer to Clarke. He covers around 1000 remedy pictures and relates numerous cases taken by himself and others. His MM and rep took him 16 years to complete and compile. His posology ranges from high C to low X, from routine to individualized. An amazing work of this kind can only be accomplished through years of observation first hand and through others, but most impressively from the experience of thousands of cases, with real live humans, not cats, experience I seriously doubt you have, Irene. If a man like this suggests that sufferers of breast cancer avoid milk and milk products, I'd SERIOUSLY listen to him . .
JB: . . followed by plenty of problems. Older people don't have the gut to digest bovine milk. Goat milk is more digestable. But it probably should be reiterated here that Clarke is not the only one to suggest avoiding animal products in a struggle against cancer.
JB: I'm happy to hear that despite an unhealthy consumption of milk, which probably contributed to the problem in the first place, that you beat breast cancer with Phytolacca, a well indicated remedy for it, as are others. Homoeopathy wins again despite all odds . .
If you're going to give open advice regarding cancer, or anything else of any real importance, see if you can refer to something other than your own imagination. It's bad enough that we're living in a time when a medical "authority" (read dictatorship) like the AMA is behaving like a terrorist organization with Pollyanna as their spokesperson.

John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)

Irene! You are spot on in this thread!!!! I agree totally with all of your comments here. Superb explanation! Caveat Emptor! Carmi Hazen

Thanks I could not remember the number when I wrote:-)
But the assuption that most people are acidic has no basis I can find other than sales hype for alkaline somethingorother. I think it is essential to know your blood and body pH before you try to mess with it. There are far more chronic illnesses with metabolic alkalosis tendencies than the hype-ers take into account. It proves theirs is a proft motive, not a health one.

Too mamy times someone comes up with a wild or uninvestigated theory (fit for life?) that totally ignores all known science, writes a website or blog or book or invents a product (alkaline water?), and all the sheeple jump on the bandwagon.

We need to be much more circumspect now that it is too easy to be duped. In the "olden days" when everyone knew everyone else in their lives either directly or by reputation, they KNEW who was to be trusted. The new electronic world we have removes that knowledge and makes it much harder to judge - bu thtat is what we need to do - investigate claimis - not take them at face value.
After all it is easier than ever to publish nonsense.

Namaste,
........Irene

--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Yes, he is an expert in THAT area, and for his time which had none of the new things in our times either as regards disease or as regars what passes for "food" in the modern world.
It does not make him a diet expert in 2014.

I have learned to use authors for THEIR area of expertise and not other areas where they are not expert.

For example Dr Peter D'Adamo is an expert in diet for gene type, but he writes also on diet for diabetics where he is NOT an expert and relies on the junk science of the ADA, (D for diabetic), which he passes on.
It is not the only one recognized by the FDA, but it is used as an example in the Federal law definitioin on homeopathy.
As I said, he is no 2014 diet expert and does notknow my gene type or ICT type. He is out of date like it or not.
The proof of the pudding is that I beat cancer using milk and meat.
Because these ARE right for me.
No. They help the problems. I did go three months without dairy as test and got so sick I was near death. I reverted to coffee and milk and my halth immediately improved. My family is from a long line of dairy and fruit farners. My gran as one of thirteen siblings, all involved in dairy and fruit, lived to the average age of these siblings, namely 105 yrs.

My own illness is a modern problem of vaccinations. My mother was the sole survivor in her school class as a child, of scarlet fever and dipheria one year, in fact the entire school died except 8 children, in ten days. And so when vaccines became available she thought the more the merrier and got me vaccinated many times as a baby (reslting in two hospitaizations for whooping cough at ages 18 mos and 4 yrs) and then from schol age I was vaccinated weekly - which she could do as she was a school teacher and could arrange it.
You should not make wild theories:-)
Clearly my dairy/fruit farming forebears and myself are able to do so.
As I said - individualization matters. MY genes are good for milk and lousy without it.
To someone else perhaps. YOU need to learn to individualize:-)
That sentence is actually what YOU shoud be reading

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

there is pH of the blood, pH of the urine - all different values. - it is NOT about body pH. It is pH of urine that you can measure and that should be 6.4 ( I also work with a system developed by Carey Reams called RBTI)

Too alkaline or too acidic both cause problems - But so many in US are more acidic due to high amounts of meats and sweets.

Sheri

At 07:09 PM 8/18/2014, you wrote:
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases and Child Health
Next classes start September

Do you know the right pH for saliva and is testing this of any value compared to urine$
Vicki

Www.labelgmoflorida.com
Www.glutenfreeyummies.com
"Sheri Nakken homeopathycuresyou@gmail.com [minutus]" wrote:
there is pH of the blood, pH of the urine - all different values. - it is NOT about body pH. It is pH of urine that you can measure and that should be 6.4 ( I also work with a system developed by Carey Reams called RBTI)

Too alkaline or too acidic both cause problems - But so many in US are more acidic due to high amounts of meats and sweets.

Sheri

At 07:09 PM 8/18/2014, you wrote:
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases and Child Health
Next classes start September

John, I think this was a very condescending and impolite way to disagree. Besides, I do believe that, while some aspects of diet are individualized, there is no contradicting our design mandate of omnivorism - at least not for long, and not in health. The most common mistake most make when judging a meat-based diet is in assuming one refers to cooked meats, most times very hard to digest completely, causing a burden which can push a disease-prone state over the top.

I am far from a scholar, but I've done my research, too, and trust what my body tells me. On this topic, your "authority" falls short of the generally useful information you usually provide. And pardon me, but I see no need to resort to sarcasm when disagreeing.

--

Ginny Wilken

gwilken@fastmail.fm

What if the person is already too alkaline?

Decades ago I was told that was my problem: not too acid, but too alkaline. (in high school I had *many* chronic health problems, and had done lots of fasting of various sorts, "mucusless diet" and many other etc.) It was also explained to me that being over-alkaline is actually worse than being over-acid, and is much more difficult to correct. (In my case long since achieved, I am happy to say.)

Being over-alkaline *also* (I read) leaves one vulnerable to cancer, among many other things. The key, usual, is balance, moderation, being within the needed range. (For most people here-and-now, "alkalize" is sound advice, but should be put in context.)

From there I have further confusion, tho. I learned that one part of the system can be over-acid, while another part is under-acid. E.g. saliva too alkaline, while urine is too acid, I think that's one example I was given? And I don't know which would be more apt to reflect the pH state of the blood, which I assume is the one more relevant to cancer. Would love to understand it better.

Shannon

Does that pH refer to saliva or urine (or something else)?
________________________________