Re: incompatible medicines
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:25 am
I have studied it.
In summary his article excerpt here explains *chemical* signalling in which a ligand (chemical that goes from one place to another) attaches to a protein receptor at the end of its journey - to trigger something (chemical) to happen.
He also says the body has many of these kinds of *chemical* activities.
That is all true - but you have misconstrued these chemical actions for homeopathic ones.
What you quote does NOT make a connection between chemical signalling and "similia similibus curentur" even though he claims an understanding of chemical signalling is useful. He does not explain here *how* it is supposed to be useful to know about chemical signalling.
YOU have assumed that homeopathy works LIKE the chemical signalling of an antibody-antigen effect and that is NOT so - nor does Chandran say it is so.
A more detailed version of what is proposed to happen at the depths of tissue structures is in the book by MDs Bellavite and Signorini. (But it also does NOT suggest homeopathy works like a ligand as you are incorrectly assuming from either party's theory.) Chandran's implication is that a ligand type action is useful to understand - not that it happens (in homeopathy).
It IS what happens in allopathy - as Chandran concludes.
Namaste,
Irene
...........
.........
(not in homeopathy)
..........
.........
(not homeopathic activity)
(not homeopathic action)
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
In summary his article excerpt here explains *chemical* signalling in which a ligand (chemical that goes from one place to another) attaches to a protein receptor at the end of its journey - to trigger something (chemical) to happen.
He also says the body has many of these kinds of *chemical* activities.
That is all true - but you have misconstrued these chemical actions for homeopathic ones.
What you quote does NOT make a connection between chemical signalling and "similia similibus curentur" even though he claims an understanding of chemical signalling is useful. He does not explain here *how* it is supposed to be useful to know about chemical signalling.
YOU have assumed that homeopathy works LIKE the chemical signalling of an antibody-antigen effect and that is NOT so - nor does Chandran say it is so.
A more detailed version of what is proposed to happen at the depths of tissue structures is in the book by MDs Bellavite and Signorini. (But it also does NOT suggest homeopathy works like a ligand as you are incorrectly assuming from either party's theory.) Chandran's implication is that a ligand type action is useful to understand - not that it happens (in homeopathy).
It IS what happens in allopathy - as Chandran concludes.
Namaste,
Irene
...........
.........
(not in homeopathy)
..........
.........
(not homeopathic activity)
(not homeopathic action)
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."