incompatible medicines

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Irene de Villiers
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:00 pm

Re: incompatible medicines

Post by Irene de Villiers »

I have studied it.
In summary his article excerpt here explains *chemical* signalling in which a ligand (chemical that goes from one place to another) attaches to a protein receptor at the end of its journey - to trigger something (chemical) to happen.
He also says the body has many of these kinds of *chemical* activities.
That is all true - but you have misconstrued these chemical actions for homeopathic ones.

What you quote does NOT make a connection between chemical signalling and "similia similibus curentur" even though he claims an understanding of chemical signalling is useful. He does not explain here *how* it is supposed to be useful to know about chemical signalling.
YOU have assumed that homeopathy works LIKE the chemical signalling of an antibody-antigen effect and that is NOT so - nor does Chandran say it is so.

A more detailed version of what is proposed to happen at the depths of tissue structures is in the book by MDs Bellavite and Signorini. (But it also does NOT suggest homeopathy works like a ligand as you are incorrectly assuming from either party's theory.) Chandran's implication is that a ligand type action is useful to understand - not that it happens (in homeopathy).

It IS what happens in allopathy - as Chandran concludes.

Namaste,
Irene
...........
.........

(not in homeopathy)

..........
.........

(not homeopathic activity)
(not homeopathic action)
Namaste,
Irene

REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."


Gisela Ahrendt
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:00 pm

Re: incompatible medicines

Post by Gisela Ahrendt »

Thank you Sheri - I would hate to run into a Hom that practises like 'buckshot' -
terrible.

________________________________

To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: homeopathycuresyou@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:09:16 -0800
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: incompatible medicines
Jeff - And where do you find that in the organon? why don't we just mix them all together and just use that, if the body know which one to use. That would make it all so much easier. And let's just give every hour till well? Jeff, you do not practice homeopathy according to the laws and principles - just because you use remedies does not make what you do homeopathy.

Might want to read David Little's article http://www.simillimum.com/education/lit ... rticle.php
http://www.homeopathyworldcommunity.com ... techniques
http://www.hpathy.com/papersold/boger-g ... emicus.asp Boger - "The repeating of the remedy too soon is one of the greatest mistakes that can be made, or equally great is the changing of a remedy. You confuse the whole picture there. "
Study Aphorism 245, 246 and 247 248 he is talking about using Cs in water & LMS in water
http://www.homeoint.org/books/hahorgan/ ... htm#P245E6
§ 245 Sixth Edition
"Every perceptibly progressive and strikingly increasing amelioration in a transient (acute) or persistent (chronic) disease, is a condition which, as long as it lasts, completely precludes every repetition of the administration of any medicine whatsoever, because all the good the medicine taken continues to effect is new hastening towards its completion. Every new dose of any medicine whatsoever, even of the one last administered, that has hitherto shown itself to be salutary, would in this case disturb the work of amelioration. "

Sheri

At 06:42 PM 2/3/2013, you wrote:


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”