Minutus

"Antidote" refers to the action of the remedy within the person, stopping the action of a dose already taken.

The things you describe involve damage (or potential damage) to the remedy itself.

When we talk about e.g. antidoting the remedy with coffee, we mean the person has antidoted the *action* of the remedy within them, not that their drinking coffee has caused damage to the remedy still in the bottle!

Shannon

I drink coffee including the strong Illy espresso brand all the time and don't antidote my remedies which are antipsoric, antimiasmatic and a new simillimum in LM and 200C. I even drink coffee sometimes right after taking a daily LM. The only way I've been able to antidote a remedy is by taking another remedy in the same potency.
Susan

What you are writing -geo- is the thinking the majority of the homeopaths of
today (270 years since first coined) are following. But some of us have
taken Homeopathy further/progressed, as any science should, into the
molecular age. It is the genious of the Master that he evolved a system
whereby by stripping, serially diluting and succusing, the molecules of the
remedy could be separated and on further proceeding in this manner, removed
completely leaving empty 3-D hydration shells in the polymer (ethyl/water
matrix) that bound onto the invading pathogenic molecules thereby
neutralizing them and rendering them inert. These negative hydration remedy
shells also bound (lock & key ) with the biological molecules to protect
them from further pathogenic intrusions and thereby brought about a swift
cure - as pathogens were negativated they were flushed out of the orginism
in natural processess.
The doctor, of course, has to ensure that the remedy is a true simillimum of
the invading pathogen. Pertial simillimum would only produce partial cure or
temporary ammeloiration.

There is much much more I need to learn, but molecular understanding of
Homeopathy is an eyeopener. The remedies of tomorrow will all be molecular
and allopathy is swiftly converting to this. Homeopathy -thanks to Hhn is
already there.

Jeff

"The remedies of tomorrow will all be molecular..." ?
In what way would a "molecular homeopathic remedy" be different from
the crude substance?

That is OK. There are several old and new theories and experiments on how
exactly hom. works.
No problem with that. But the fact remains: materia medica is built upon
experimentation
regardless of the theoretical basis of the "why" it works. It works.
-geo-

-----Mensagem Original-----
From: jtikari
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:20 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Coffee and homeopathy

What you are writing -geo- is the thinking the majority of the homeopaths of
today (270 years since first coined) are following. But some of us have
taken Homeopathy further/progressed, as any science should, into the
molecular age. It is the genious of the Master that he evolved a system
whereby by stripping, serially diluting and succusing, the molecules of the
remedy could be separated and on further proceeding in this manner, removed
completely leaving empty 3-D hydration shells in the polymer (ethyl/water
matrix) that bound onto the invading pathogenic molecules thereby
neutralizing them and rendering them inert. These negative hydration remedy
shells also bound (lock & key ) with the biological molecules to protect
them from further pathogenic intrusions and thereby brought about a swift
cure - as pathogens were negativated they were flushed out of the orginism
in natural processess.
The doctor, of course, has to ensure that the remedy is a true simillimum of
the invading pathogen. Pertial simillimum would only produce partial cure or
temporary ammeloiration.

There is much much more I need to learn, but molecular understanding of
Homeopathy is an eyeopener. The remedies of tomorrow will all be molecular
and allopathy is swiftly converting to this. Homeopathy -thanks to Hhn is
already there.

Jeff

All this cr*p about hydration shells and electrons, etc. etc. etc. is pure useless speculation. Nice ideas not grounded in fact. No one knows "what is in" a homeopathic remedy that acts or how it acts on the living being. It just leads to derision from the conventional science community. Better just to say we dont know until we do know.

What is fact that can be demonstrated is that a remedy acts on a living being. Nuf said.

Roger

If something is beyond you and you don't understand it, it is better to say nothing.
jeff

I havn't seen this reproduced on the web by Mintus. Is it too contraversial?

Jeff

Hi Jeff, it did come through. (I can't figure out what it *means*,
but I do recall seeing it.)
Shannon