Hahnemann's Organon of Medicine - Aphorism 54

[Shannon Nelson]

The writer may have not realized to whom he was writing (list owner, and
teacher of homeopathy), may have made other assumptions, and be now
regretting his hasty (?) post...

Sometimes the kindest response to such a "faux pas" is to ignore it...

Regards to all,
Shannon
on 8/10/02 11:40 AM, Jan Klüssendorf at jk@airstop.be wrote:

[Jan Klüssendorf]

> "The writer may have not realized to whom he was writing (list owner, and
teacher of homeopathy), may have made other assumptions, and be now
regretting his hasty (?) post...
Sometimes the kindest response to such a "faux pas" is to ignore it..."

Dear Shanon,

This is indeed a very wise conclusion of the incident.
Let's give it a rest and accept the wise words of isali ben-Jacob when he
wrote on the subject:
My dear Shreeram, most fundamentally is the need to
communicate in a collegiate manner as an agreed upon standard
of conduct. We must agree to be respectful of differences.
And I would add to that, that we ought to 'practise no
judgment'.

Thank you for this valuable advise, to and for all of us.

Jan

[Paul Booyse]

Sheeram,

system
one
copy
purpose
a
your

Practice some courtesy. Do you read your Organon? Focusing on an Aphorism a
day may just keep some people focused. More waste is occurred by people
hitting "reply to all" thereby generating two emails. You have somehow cc'd
to someone else as well. Further waste by not editing messages, so we end
up with reams of text adding on in a topic.

If you object to the aphorisms, at least do so in a pleasant manner and in
the singular, and realise others may have different views.

need

Whereupon the aphorism currently incurring your wrath is appropriate - yes?
(The words at least)

[Chris]

Such comment is totally uncalled for.

You make the biggest mistake of all in 'assuming' Get your facts right!
Not everyone has got a copy of the Organon of Medicine. I, for one, haven't
so I look forward to what Dr Ardavan writes. You say "it's word verbatim".
What if it is? Let's remember that Hahnemann was a genius and I would far
rather read word-for-word what he wrote than have someone interpret it their
way of thinking, no matter how great that person is.

I have a great passion for homeopathy and I have learnt a great deal from
this group, having been a member since it first started. The one thing that
makes me so angry beyond belief is criticism, and unfair criticisim at that.
It is so so easy to criticise. Why do you do it? Just bear in mind for one
moment, if you will, the amount of work that a group like this generates. It
is far worse than having a full-time job, because at least with a full time
job you can come home and relax; with a project such as this, it is 24 hours
a day. And bear in mind, also, that many of the members of this group are
qualified homeopaths themselves, giving what knowledge they have for 'free'
and, in so doing, have helped untold number of people. How dare you
criticise! What have you done for anyone?

And how dare you hold a person's nationality against them. It just goes to
show what a little mind you've got. You say, "I am not a homoeopath myself,
but am a convinved briefholder for the system
as a curative force. " These words mean absolutely nothing to me, but I
would suggest (going by what I 'assume' it to mean), that you first heal
yourself, because with such negativity that's within you there is no way
that you could ever be what you say you are!

If you feel you must reply then write to me direct at 'crystalure@pandevah
fsnet.co.uk'.

Minutus doesn't want to hear any more negativity. It's had its fair share
already.

However, to end on a note that I was convinced of many years ago, and still
am today: 'if Hahnemann was alive today he would be extremely proud of the
work that Dr Ardavan is doing'.

Christine

[Dr. Waqar Taji]

Dear members,
The best thing is to ignore such people.
They don't even deserve a reply.
Happy learning to all and my best wishes to Ardvan Shahrdar.
Keep it up.
Waqar Taji