No .... actually the muscle part of the bull is intended:-)
The research on plant antioxidants in cancer is useful but throwing the baby out with the bathwater by skipping animal protien is not a smart move. The protein is necessary and needs to be in the right proportions and from good ANIMAL sources to be optimal in cancer. The LAST thing to do is to use plant protein as that just whacks the kidneys, increases toxins, leaves out essential nutrient balance and makes things worse.
So you need lots of plant antioxidants plus Vit E and alpha lipoic acid and other supplements - and a moderate amount of high quality animal protien in cancer.
Except - NO plants in carnivores - where you really learn the lesson of which animal proteins to use against cancer.
Carnivores like cats cannot digest or benefit from plants at all, and so it is there that I learend how to select animal proteins for use in cancer.
(Plant proteins are a good way to kill a cat - and to wreck human kidneys)
YOu cannot fight cancer with a protein deficit - so it needs animal proteins.
well there are no ketones in meat, so that was not valid
Well he is wrong.
It needs to be individualized.
I drink a great deal of milk as I use latte istead of water.
My case of breast cancer in 2000 was corrected in a little more than one month using Phytolacca topically and by mouth, starting from a diagnosed 2 inch tumor with pain, and with pain gone in a week, to no symptoms or lump after 2 months. The only scary part was avoiding forced surgery on medicaid. (I told the Dr I was going for a 2nd opinioin.... which I found in the mirror.)
Cancer responds well to the right remedy, plus the right diet for the individual. As a person with my genotype and blood type and ICT type, my cancer woudl have become worse if I followed Clarke's advice and avoided meat and milk. That generalization may well have worked "on average" but there is no science behind it, and he likely had success due to what was fed.
I can see how a diet where proteins are from egg and seafood could help - but the pollution levels today are hard to overcome.
Not good because it is not the vegan aspect that helps but the forced high plant antioxidants that are almost automatic with a vegan diet. A few blood type A individuals might tolerate a egan diet a while but it6 is not a healthy one and it is ALWAYS better in cancer to eat a heaty diet. SO the science is to eat high antioxidant foods but not to avoid beneficial animal protein.
One learns a lot from working witih carnivores. I had read all the stuff on vegan but was faced with carnivores with cancer. And WE are omnivores not herbivores or carnivores so we NEED an omnivore diet to be healthy.
NOt a vegan one. That is only healthy for herbivores.
No. FIne to eat good quality meat, but I agree NO sugar.
I would add no starch either. SO no pasta, rice, bread, ete. Get the B's from mushrooms, and use all the high antioxidant veg. Greenie drinks all day, icluding yogurt and raw milk if you can tolerate dairy. And eggs.
THis is a fallacy - that it is okay to have poor nutrition during cancer.
YOu need the BEST nutrition during cancer. The BEST OPTION can indeed be "for ever diet"
No.
Homeopaths yes.
Whether they are physicians with an allopathy license, maybe.
I think it is.
Without proper diet there is no point looking to see if someting else needs fixing.
Maintaining cause was a Hahnemann idea.
THose are not meat, they are baloney:-)
Meat is like muscle pieces fresh slaughtered from organically farmed animals eating non GMO grasses.
THAT is real meat:-)
Not all of them either. SKip the starchy ones.
Go for onion family, mushrooms and color
Even more important - get the right fats and loads of Vit E.
What you need to push is GOOD nutrition not the baloney you listed as meat.
And the reason to push it is that cancer will kill if the diet is not individually correct and good for the cancer sufferer.
I would NOT chance his fishy idea. I would use what these days I can KNOW is good for ME.
And if I had a client I would do likewise.
Maybe Clarke did not have access to all the knowledge and research that is new, for individualization of diet. That is not an excuse for US to pretend it is not there and fail to use it.
If you always do what was always done, then by definition there is NO progress.
I for one, prefer to make progress.
SO I would devise a cancer diet individualized for the individual and species.
I would not feed vegan to a carnivore or omnivore, and would not feed pure meat to a omnivore or herbivore.
We have these category distinctions specifically becasue of metabolic and nutritional requirements of each category - herbivore, omnivore and carnivore. The ideal cancer diet takes that into account very seriously and works within it to obtain the best within it with CURRENT options and knowledge. (Current includes past findings as well as new ones, properly integrated, the total being the current knowledge.)
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."