Radiation treatment
Re: Radiation treatment
Your example is a case of some company cornering the market on an essential product. My spin was that some people will buy anything just so long as they are told that it is healthy.
Roger
________________________________
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 17:20:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Radiation treatment
This is already happening. That is what the water wars are all about now. Ovecharging poor people in Detroit and threatening
to cut off their water. California under corporate pressure to sell water rights to a private French corporation. Just to name 2 current
situations.
t
________________________________
Roger
________________________________
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 17:20:14 -0400
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Radiation treatment
This is already happening. That is what the water wars are all about now. Ovecharging poor people in Detroit and threatening
to cut off their water. California under corporate pressure to sell water rights to a private French corporation. Just to name 2 current
situations.
t
________________________________
-
- Posts: 3237
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:00 pm
Re: Radiation treatment
Yes but they will get a patent on it first:-)
.....Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
.....Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:00 pm
Re: Radiation treatment
In a message dated 8/14/2014 12:40:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, minutus@yahoogroups.com writes:
The sugar part sounds right to me, but suggesting an animal protein diet for cancer sufferers is BULLSHIT. Am I the only one on this list to jump on this? You should all be on board with it! If there is any empirical oncological orthodoxy to be found regarding a cancer diet by a homeopath, I would kindly ask the author of this ketone from meat baloney to STFU and read John Henry Clarke, MD, the only homeopath I've seen specifically referred to by the FDA as an authority on the subject.
Clarke,who treated and cured cancer sufferers HOMOEOPATHICALLY suggested, in addition to PRESCRIBING specific dynamic remedies . . suggested as a diet plan for them a MEAT FREE DIET. He specifically says that women suffering from breast cancer AVOID MILK BASED PRODUCTS.
A recent 7 hour documentary on cancer, promoted on this list, came to the same conclusion, if you have cancer, go on a plant based diet, i.e. VEGAN.
I have found this corroborated in my own experience as a maverick physician. Dr. Al Aguirre, ND, my best orthomolecular teacher, cured people of cancer by putting them on diets free of animal products, and he was persecuted by the AMA for it, too. But let it be said, if you have cancer, STOP EATING MEAT, avoid sugar and go on a MEAT FREE and SUGAR REDUCED DIET.
(It doesn't have to be forever)
I thought his was a list for and by homoeopathic physicians, and although diet is technically not homoeopathy, I'm surprised that NO ONE I've seen on this list has had anything CONCORDANT to say about it. Counseling people to eat meat and animal by products is the worst advice you can give a cancer sufferer.
The worst meats are reportedly the processed ones like BALONEY and the "smoked" meats like BACON. Confront your meat and sugar addiction if you have the Big C and stop eating meat..
Sorry. I love steak, bacon and burgers, steak as much as the next redneck, but it's the hard cold truth.
LOL! It must have been a maverick RANCHER like Cliven Bundy who suggested eating meat to cure cancer . . OMG. Come on everybody, scrape it together, jump on nonsense when you see it.
EAT YOUR VEGETABLES!
That being said, Clarke reports that he has seen meat eaters cured of cancer, but why push it? He says a little white fish is okay, maybe, sometimes . . but if you have cancer, why would you want to chance it?
love and best wishes,
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)
The sugar part sounds right to me, but suggesting an animal protein diet for cancer sufferers is BULLSHIT. Am I the only one on this list to jump on this? You should all be on board with it! If there is any empirical oncological orthodoxy to be found regarding a cancer diet by a homeopath, I would kindly ask the author of this ketone from meat baloney to STFU and read John Henry Clarke, MD, the only homeopath I've seen specifically referred to by the FDA as an authority on the subject.
Clarke,who treated and cured cancer sufferers HOMOEOPATHICALLY suggested, in addition to PRESCRIBING specific dynamic remedies . . suggested as a diet plan for them a MEAT FREE DIET. He specifically says that women suffering from breast cancer AVOID MILK BASED PRODUCTS.
A recent 7 hour documentary on cancer, promoted on this list, came to the same conclusion, if you have cancer, go on a plant based diet, i.e. VEGAN.
I have found this corroborated in my own experience as a maverick physician. Dr. Al Aguirre, ND, my best orthomolecular teacher, cured people of cancer by putting them on diets free of animal products, and he was persecuted by the AMA for it, too. But let it be said, if you have cancer, STOP EATING MEAT, avoid sugar and go on a MEAT FREE and SUGAR REDUCED DIET.
(It doesn't have to be forever)
I thought his was a list for and by homoeopathic physicians, and although diet is technically not homoeopathy, I'm surprised that NO ONE I've seen on this list has had anything CONCORDANT to say about it. Counseling people to eat meat and animal by products is the worst advice you can give a cancer sufferer.
The worst meats are reportedly the processed ones like BALONEY and the "smoked" meats like BACON. Confront your meat and sugar addiction if you have the Big C and stop eating meat..
Sorry. I love steak, bacon and burgers, steak as much as the next redneck, but it's the hard cold truth.
LOL! It must have been a maverick RANCHER like Cliven Bundy who suggested eating meat to cure cancer . . OMG. Come on everybody, scrape it together, jump on nonsense when you see it.
EAT YOUR VEGETABLES!
That being said, Clarke reports that he has seen meat eaters cured of cancer, but why push it? He says a little white fish is okay, maybe, sometimes . . but if you have cancer, why would you want to chance it?
love and best wishes,
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)
-
- Posts: 3999
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm
Re: Radiation treatment
alkalize
Sheri
At 09:48 AM 8/17/2014, you wrote:
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases and Child Health
Next classes start September
Sheri
At 09:48 AM 8/17/2014, you wrote:
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases and Child Health
Next classes start September
-
- Posts: 5602
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2001 11:00 pm
Re: Radiation treatment
Admittedly, I have not been following this discussion and just caught your response John.
Agree. Back in the 1970’s I think there was a small article burned in the NY Times stating that all
the meat eating of Americans was a causative factor in cancer. Years later I came across this same
info in mainstream media, again, a very small and buried article.
All cancer diets that I have come across, except for the Budwig diet which uses cottage cheese, are
vegan and raw or mainly raw. Even the Budwig diet stresses raw vegetables.
I don’t know where eating meat for cancer cure came from other than the Meat and Dairy industries.
Sadly, a woman I am working with who has cancer, 2nd round which is now in the bones of of the upper spine,
has begun to eat meat because her blood count is down and she fears anemia. This was encouraged, of course,
by her allopathic doctors!
t
Agree. Back in the 1970’s I think there was a small article burned in the NY Times stating that all
the meat eating of Americans was a causative factor in cancer. Years later I came across this same
info in mainstream media, again, a very small and buried article.
All cancer diets that I have come across, except for the Budwig diet which uses cottage cheese, are
vegan and raw or mainly raw. Even the Budwig diet stresses raw vegetables.
I don’t know where eating meat for cancer cure came from other than the Meat and Dairy industries.
Sadly, a woman I am working with who has cancer, 2nd round which is now in the bones of of the upper spine,
has begun to eat meat because her blood count is down and she fears anemia. This was encouraged, of course,
by her allopathic doctors!
t
-
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:00 pm
Re: Radiation treatment
Anyone with advanced cancer, especially deemed incurable by allopathy, should seek nutritional and enzyme support from Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez in NYC, in practice for almost 30 years. He uses both vegan and animal meat diets, depending on the cancer.
http://www.dr-gonzalez.com/index.htm
"Diet: The prescribed diets are quite variable, and can range from nearly vegetarian to diets requiring red meat 2-3 times a day. Each patient receives individualized dietary recommendations. All the diets, however, require that the patient consume primarily organic foods, make and drink fresh vegetable juice, and avoid synthetic and refined foods such as white flour and white sugar. "
http://www.dr-gonzalez.com/treatment.htm
His numerous cancer cases including pancreatic cancer cures
http://www.dr-gonzalez.com/case_reports.htm
Our food supply has been changed a-lot since Dr. Clarke's days. Our SAD (standard American diet) has mostly grain fed meat, grains which likely is GMO, thus high Omega 6, little Omega 3 essential fatty acids and unless like me they eat no refined sugar, is full of refined sugars, HFCS (high fructose corn syrup, additives, preservatives, etc.
John Henry Clarke MD (1853 – November 24, 1931 was a prominent English classical homeopath . He was also, arguably, the most important anti-Semite in Great Britain. He led The Britons, an anti-Semitic organization.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Henry_Clarke
Susan
http://www.dr-gonzalez.com/index.htm
"Diet: The prescribed diets are quite variable, and can range from nearly vegetarian to diets requiring red meat 2-3 times a day. Each patient receives individualized dietary recommendations. All the diets, however, require that the patient consume primarily organic foods, make and drink fresh vegetable juice, and avoid synthetic and refined foods such as white flour and white sugar. "
http://www.dr-gonzalez.com/treatment.htm
His numerous cancer cases including pancreatic cancer cures
http://www.dr-gonzalez.com/case_reports.htm
Our food supply has been changed a-lot since Dr. Clarke's days. Our SAD (standard American diet) has mostly grain fed meat, grains which likely is GMO, thus high Omega 6, little Omega 3 essential fatty acids and unless like me they eat no refined sugar, is full of refined sugars, HFCS (high fructose corn syrup, additives, preservatives, etc.
John Henry Clarke MD (1853 – November 24, 1931 was a prominent English classical homeopath . He was also, arguably, the most important anti-Semite in Great Britain. He led The Britons, an anti-Semitic organization.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Henry_Clarke
Susan
-
- Posts: 3237
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:00 pm
Re: Radiation treatment
No .... actually the muscle part of the bull is intended:-)
The research on plant antioxidants in cancer is useful but throwing the baby out with the bathwater by skipping animal protien is not a smart move. The protein is necessary and needs to be in the right proportions and from good ANIMAL sources to be optimal in cancer. The LAST thing to do is to use plant protein as that just whacks the kidneys, increases toxins, leaves out essential nutrient balance and makes things worse.
So you need lots of plant antioxidants plus Vit E and alpha lipoic acid and other supplements - and a moderate amount of high quality animal protien in cancer.
Except - NO plants in carnivores - where you really learn the lesson of which animal proteins to use against cancer.
Carnivores like cats cannot digest or benefit from plants at all, and so it is there that I learend how to select animal proteins for use in cancer.
(Plant proteins are a good way to kill a cat - and to wreck human kidneys)
YOu cannot fight cancer with a protein deficit - so it needs animal proteins.
well there are no ketones in meat, so that was not valid
Well he is wrong.
It needs to be individualized.
I drink a great deal of milk as I use latte istead of water.
My case of breast cancer in 2000 was corrected in a little more than one month using Phytolacca topically and by mouth, starting from a diagnosed 2 inch tumor with pain, and with pain gone in a week, to no symptoms or lump after 2 months. The only scary part was avoiding forced surgery on medicaid. (I told the Dr I was going for a 2nd opinioin.... which I found in the mirror.)
Cancer responds well to the right remedy, plus the right diet for the individual. As a person with my genotype and blood type and ICT type, my cancer woudl have become worse if I followed Clarke's advice and avoided meat and milk. That generalization may well have worked "on average" but there is no science behind it, and he likely had success due to what was fed.
I can see how a diet where proteins are from egg and seafood could help - but the pollution levels today are hard to overcome.
Not good because it is not the vegan aspect that helps but the forced high plant antioxidants that are almost automatic with a vegan diet. A few blood type A individuals might tolerate a egan diet a while but it6 is not a healthy one and it is ALWAYS better in cancer to eat a heaty diet. SO the science is to eat high antioxidant foods but not to avoid beneficial animal protein.
One learns a lot from working witih carnivores. I had read all the stuff on vegan but was faced with carnivores with cancer. And WE are omnivores not herbivores or carnivores so we NEED an omnivore diet to be healthy.
NOt a vegan one. That is only healthy for herbivores.
No. FIne to eat good quality meat, but I agree NO sugar.
I would add no starch either. SO no pasta, rice, bread, ete. Get the B's from mushrooms, and use all the high antioxidant veg. Greenie drinks all day, icluding yogurt and raw milk if you can tolerate dairy. And eggs.
THis is a fallacy - that it is okay to have poor nutrition during cancer.
YOu need the BEST nutrition during cancer. The BEST OPTION can indeed be "for ever diet"
No.
Homeopaths yes.
Whether they are physicians with an allopathy license, maybe.
I think it is.
Without proper diet there is no point looking to see if someting else needs fixing.
Maintaining cause was a Hahnemann idea.
THose are not meat, they are baloney:-)
Meat is like muscle pieces fresh slaughtered from organically farmed animals eating non GMO grasses.
THAT is real meat:-)
Not all of them either. SKip the starchy ones.
Go for onion family, mushrooms and color
Even more important - get the right fats and loads of Vit E.
What you need to push is GOOD nutrition not the baloney you listed as meat.
And the reason to push it is that cancer will kill if the diet is not individually correct and good for the cancer sufferer.
I would NOT chance his fishy idea. I would use what these days I can KNOW is good for ME.
And if I had a client I would do likewise.
Maybe Clarke did not have access to all the knowledge and research that is new, for individualization of diet. That is not an excuse for US to pretend it is not there and fail to use it.
If you always do what was always done, then by definition there is NO progress.
I for one, prefer to make progress.
SO I would devise a cancer diet individualized for the individual and species.
I would not feed vegan to a carnivore or omnivore, and would not feed pure meat to a omnivore or herbivore.
We have these category distinctions specifically becasue of metabolic and nutritional requirements of each category - herbivore, omnivore and carnivore. The ideal cancer diet takes that into account very seriously and works within it to obtain the best within it with CURRENT options and knowledge. (Current includes past findings as well as new ones, properly integrated, the total being the current knowledge.)
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
The research on plant antioxidants in cancer is useful but throwing the baby out with the bathwater by skipping animal protien is not a smart move. The protein is necessary and needs to be in the right proportions and from good ANIMAL sources to be optimal in cancer. The LAST thing to do is to use plant protein as that just whacks the kidneys, increases toxins, leaves out essential nutrient balance and makes things worse.
So you need lots of plant antioxidants plus Vit E and alpha lipoic acid and other supplements - and a moderate amount of high quality animal protien in cancer.
Except - NO plants in carnivores - where you really learn the lesson of which animal proteins to use against cancer.
Carnivores like cats cannot digest or benefit from plants at all, and so it is there that I learend how to select animal proteins for use in cancer.
(Plant proteins are a good way to kill a cat - and to wreck human kidneys)
YOu cannot fight cancer with a protein deficit - so it needs animal proteins.
well there are no ketones in meat, so that was not valid
Well he is wrong.
It needs to be individualized.
I drink a great deal of milk as I use latte istead of water.
My case of breast cancer in 2000 was corrected in a little more than one month using Phytolacca topically and by mouth, starting from a diagnosed 2 inch tumor with pain, and with pain gone in a week, to no symptoms or lump after 2 months. The only scary part was avoiding forced surgery on medicaid. (I told the Dr I was going for a 2nd opinioin.... which I found in the mirror.)
Cancer responds well to the right remedy, plus the right diet for the individual. As a person with my genotype and blood type and ICT type, my cancer woudl have become worse if I followed Clarke's advice and avoided meat and milk. That generalization may well have worked "on average" but there is no science behind it, and he likely had success due to what was fed.
I can see how a diet where proteins are from egg and seafood could help - but the pollution levels today are hard to overcome.
Not good because it is not the vegan aspect that helps but the forced high plant antioxidants that are almost automatic with a vegan diet. A few blood type A individuals might tolerate a egan diet a while but it6 is not a healthy one and it is ALWAYS better in cancer to eat a heaty diet. SO the science is to eat high antioxidant foods but not to avoid beneficial animal protein.
One learns a lot from working witih carnivores. I had read all the stuff on vegan but was faced with carnivores with cancer. And WE are omnivores not herbivores or carnivores so we NEED an omnivore diet to be healthy.
NOt a vegan one. That is only healthy for herbivores.
No. FIne to eat good quality meat, but I agree NO sugar.
I would add no starch either. SO no pasta, rice, bread, ete. Get the B's from mushrooms, and use all the high antioxidant veg. Greenie drinks all day, icluding yogurt and raw milk if you can tolerate dairy. And eggs.
THis is a fallacy - that it is okay to have poor nutrition during cancer.
YOu need the BEST nutrition during cancer. The BEST OPTION can indeed be "for ever diet"
No.
Homeopaths yes.
Whether they are physicians with an allopathy license, maybe.
I think it is.
Without proper diet there is no point looking to see if someting else needs fixing.
Maintaining cause was a Hahnemann idea.
THose are not meat, they are baloney:-)
Meat is like muscle pieces fresh slaughtered from organically farmed animals eating non GMO grasses.
THAT is real meat:-)
Not all of them either. SKip the starchy ones.
Go for onion family, mushrooms and color
Even more important - get the right fats and loads of Vit E.
What you need to push is GOOD nutrition not the baloney you listed as meat.
And the reason to push it is that cancer will kill if the diet is not individually correct and good for the cancer sufferer.
I would NOT chance his fishy idea. I would use what these days I can KNOW is good for ME.
And if I had a client I would do likewise.
Maybe Clarke did not have access to all the knowledge and research that is new, for individualization of diet. That is not an excuse for US to pretend it is not there and fail to use it.
If you always do what was always done, then by definition there is NO progress.
I for one, prefer to make progress.
SO I would devise a cancer diet individualized for the individual and species.
I would not feed vegan to a carnivore or omnivore, and would not feed pure meat to a omnivore or herbivore.
We have these category distinctions specifically becasue of metabolic and nutritional requirements of each category - herbivore, omnivore and carnivore. The ideal cancer diet takes that into account very seriously and works within it to obtain the best within it with CURRENT options and knowledge. (Current includes past findings as well as new ones, properly integrated, the total being the current knowledge.)
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
-
- Posts: 3237
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:00 pm
Re: Radiation treatment
That would be dangerous.
Neutralize the pH to the optimal one which is a little - not a lot - above 7.
People with metabolic alkalosis and cancer need ACID.
You can not just go about blindly alkalizing.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
Neutralize the pH to the optimal one which is a little - not a lot - above 7.
People with metabolic alkalosis and cancer need ACID.
You can not just go about blindly alkalizing.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
-
- Posts: 3237
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:00 pm
Re: Radiation treatment
It is not sad, it is correct.
Sad would be to force her to have anemia as well as cancer.
She SHOULD be eating a healthy diet that includes red meat.
WHat she needs to change is the source of the meat - to be orgaincally farmed grass fed, no horones and such
ALso her Vit E needs to be boosted high, otherwise what iron she gets will be sequestered and unavailable for use in red cell making. It also needs arachidonic acid, which she may be too ill to make, and which only occurs in animal fat. Anemia is not just an iron issue. Her kidneys need to be making enough erythropoitin as wel, which they will not be able to do if she is eating plant protein.
People who survive cancer on vegan diets do so in spite of the diet lacking animal protien - not because of it.
WHat is needed is BOTH - the benefits of non-starchy HIGH-antioxidant vegatables AND healthy animal protein including red meat.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
Sad would be to force her to have anemia as well as cancer.
She SHOULD be eating a healthy diet that includes red meat.
WHat she needs to change is the source of the meat - to be orgaincally farmed grass fed, no horones and such
ALso her Vit E needs to be boosted high, otherwise what iron she gets will be sequestered and unavailable for use in red cell making. It also needs arachidonic acid, which she may be too ill to make, and which only occurs in animal fat. Anemia is not just an iron issue. Her kidneys need to be making enough erythropoitin as wel, which they will not be able to do if she is eating plant protein.
People who survive cancer on vegan diets do so in spite of the diet lacking animal protien - not because of it.
WHat is needed is BOTH - the benefits of non-starchy HIGH-antioxidant vegatables AND healthy animal protein including red meat.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
Re: Radiation treatment
Given that most people are too acidic, and most people do one dimensional thinking ("good cholesterol", "bad cholesterol", etc.), it is no surprise that people talk about alkalizing all of the time and don't talk about balancing pH. I believe that the ideal pH is 7.35 or 7.4
Roger
________________________________
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:04:31 -0700
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Radiation treatment
That would be dangerous.
Neutralize the pH to the optimal one which is a little - not a lot - above 7.
People with metabolic alkalosis and cancer need ACID.
You can not just go about blindly alkalizing.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
Roger
________________________________
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:04:31 -0700
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Radiation treatment
That would be dangerous.
Neutralize the pH to the optimal one which is a little - not a lot - above 7.
People with metabolic alkalosis and cancer need ACID.
You can not just go about blindly alkalizing.
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."