PS Fear of the Invisible book on viruses & polio and AIDS and HIV

[Luise Kunkle]

Hi Hennie,

Of course it may work the way you say - or any number of other ways.

But in order to get the cell(s) to do what it wants, the virus has to
be there. It has to come from somewhere. This coming from somewhere is
what we have been talking about.

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

[Hennie Duits]

I think it is possible that the thingies we call virusses actually could
be something else, at least in a number of cases.

Hennie

Luise Kunkle schreef:

[Soroush Ebrahimi]

OK - As far as Homs are concerned - does it matter what they are?
We are only interested in the type of SX caused by them.
Can we use the general term - Materia peccans - as used by the Master!
Rgds
Soroush
PS - Next qn is - How many angels can dance on the head of a pin! Answers in triplicate please.

________________________________

From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Hennie Duits
Sent: 12 September 2008 15:45
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] PS Fear of the Invisible book on viruses & polio and AIDS and HIV
I think it is possible that the thingies we call virusses actually could
be something else, at least in a number of cases.

Hennie

Luise Kunkle schreef:
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1667 - Release Date: 9/11/2008 6:55 PM

[Shannon Nelson]

Hi Hennie,
I'm curious to hear the rest of that thought?
Are you talking about mis-classifying based on appearance, or something
else?
Shannon

[Hennie Duits]

Dunno, as an harassed cell (by pesticides, radiation, poisoned food,
whatever) I might need to excrete some packages of damaged DNA or other
stuff I want to get rid of. These could look like virusses while being
excretion products of irritated cells.

Robert & Shannon Nelson schreef:

[Shannon Nelson]

Okay, so based on appearance, I think you're saying?
No doubt that could be. It doesn't seem like the results would be
uniform enough to *replace* other observations; or to apply to large
observed populations... Remember what makes something (be classed as)
a "virus" is not primarily its appearance, but its behavior...

[Hennie Duits]

I don't mean to say it is either this or that (thing almost never are),
and with the apparent blanks in the virus approach, there's no good
reason to assume it is the only valid way to think.
Robert & Shannon Nelson schreef: