Page 2 of 7
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:09 pm
				by Shannon M
				Hi Vera,
A bunch of questions leap to mind, but mainly I wonder why anyone would 
continue to take a remedy that seemed to be making them worse?  Were 
they told to continue *regardless* of what changed, or were they 
without guidance and thinking that maybe they just hadn't "taken 
enough", or ??
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
			 
			
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:19 pm
				by radha rani
				needn't be confused as it is a clear symptomatic occurance of conium  employing in lower poteny. the legs as reported are paralysed. Should  conium be given in higher potency , and wait until the patient attains  a strength to drink a coffee atleast. Then among the dulcamara, acid  nitricum, nitri-sub-dulcis coffea crude, one drug maybe given  symptomatically. The doctore reported the case is highly appreciable,  for the conscience and acceptance.such practitioners become stars and  historians of homeopathy. A perfection will be achieved without a  deviation. 
  I appreciate . 
  A rescue remedy from bachflower along with the administration of drugs  as mentioned will always keep the patient away from any danger.  carboveg and opium in our homeopathy too.......
   when the patien becomes normal he might need kaliphos in 1M potency
VR VR  wrote:                                                  I  also don't understand use of constant repetitions of unchanged doses  and potencies when Hahnemann spoke so categorically against it in 247,  but I do know that many homeopaths who are older, wiser and more  experienced than me use these methods. I prefer not to, especially  since I knew of someone who died, I think prematurely, several months  after starting to take a remedy in this way. 
 I was  recently contacted by someone who felt her baby son had been harmed by  constant repetitions of fairly large doses of homeopathic remedies, and  was concerned that the damage was irreversible. Difficult to suggest  coffee in this case! And hard to know what to say.
  In the case you mention, it does seem that if the symptoms are still  Conium, to give the remedy but possibly in different potencies and  different ways (olfaction, medicinal solution etc.). Alternatively, to  give the remedy best suited to the case at this time. Are you  absolutely certain that the damage was caused by the repetition of  Conium in this case? The patient is elderly, and may have experienced  something else during the week of Conium that brought on a worsening in  his condition - whether emotional or physical.
    Vera
  briut1  wrote:
            Dear group,
  I hear a lot about real damages that are inflicted upon patients with 
  administering daily doses (mostly dry 6-30 C or liquid LM without 
  changing the potency) especialy to those patient who are very weak.
  First I would like any of you who uses these methods to think again 
  whether you sure that you are not harming your patients.
  Don't forget that Hahnemann tried these methods and wrote very strictly 
  against it in the Organon. (and this is also true about giving the LM 
  in liquid, if it is not given properly with dynamization). 
  Please don't forget to: "First Do Not Harm".
  Now, A patient, 94 years old, who is very ill today after had been 
  given daily doses of 6C Conium (which was probably the simillimum) two 
  month ago, and had to be rushed to the hospital in a critical condition 
  of rigidity all over the body and dementia, about a week after he had 
  started taking it.
  He is now back in his home and his mental health is good but 
  unfortunatly he is almost paralyse in his lower limbs which depresses 
  his spirit very much because he is almost cannot move at all. He is 
  also much more tired now and sleep most of the day.
  Can you tell what do you think would you do now to try and repair the 
  damage?
  How would you antidote a simillimum given daily? 
  Thank you
  Ben.
  ---------------------------------
  Get your email and see which of your friends are online - Right on the  new Yahoo.com
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
---------------------------------
Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
			 
			
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:15 pm
				by Tanya Marquette
				i am a bit cynical about homeopathy begin causative of this 94 yr old's
conditon.
no one has raised the question of whether it was simply a concomittant which
had not effect on the patient.
tanya
helped?
strictly
condition
Homoeopathy
out
site
single
and educational benefit of its members. It makes no representations
regarding the individual suitability of the information contained in any
document read or advice or recommendation offered which appears on this
website and/or email postings for any purpose. The entire risk arising out
of their use remains with the recipient. In no event shall the minutus site
or its individual members be liable for any direct, consequential,
incidental, special, punitive or other damages whatsoever and howsoever
caused. 
your setting at 
http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/minutus to receive a
single daily digest.
 
			 
			
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:04 am
				by Shannon M
				But even *if* this is truly caused by the remedy (which I've a hard 
time imagining, tho I like to "never say never"), why assume the conium 
needs to be *antidoted*, rather than simply have its action gentled?
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
			 
			
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:20 am
				by radha rani
				NO it happens, otherwise Lachesis would even had been available in  lower potency. Belladonna, conium, i saw damaging in lower potencies  sometimes. But one should understand that what we call the damage is  not the damage, but the keynotes or constitution of the drug is proved  here. But let me tell you that it happens only with the week  constitution.. I have seen a 7 years girl went into coma after few  doses of belladona is given in 30 potency. The medicine was given in a  school as a prevention of japanieselephantities or brain fever. But  every one was ok .......but after a week a girl went into coma with  highest temp, delirium and threatening bell symptoms. It is because her  brain is already affected by brainfever earlier which was not traced.  the bell administration led to aggrevation of symptoms. I was there  tempted for Bell in 1 M potency for administration, but the parents  with the fear and panic took her to ICU and after scanning the brain  and all she
 returned back after a month or so. they said a swelliing  and infection in brain. 
   A single dose of Bell in 1M potency could have cured instead of  expenditure. The conium in the case reported definetly cause the  damage( we call it damage though it is not) when the patient has week  constitution ......when The vital force is week to fight against  the  drug action ( here input of drug creating the desease)
  the drug action prevail predominantly resulting in the symptoms of the drug. 
  repeated doses in lower potencies always damage when there is not  sufficient vital force, or anemic, or week functioning of lever, or  potassium and sodium salts shortage existance. 
   thak you
Dogs on Holiday-UK  wrote:                                                  I'd ike to know how long, or over what period of time it had been given.
  Had it been given more than once in a day and for how many days?
  Christine
			 
			
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:08 am
				by Shannon M
				hi Radha,
There seems to be confusion and disagreement about so many low/high 
potency issues...  I was taught that it's usually safer and more 
appropriate to use low potencies with people who are elderly and/or 
very weak.  Is your experience and understanding counter to that, or is 
it only *repeated* low potency doses that you see to be possibly 
harmful in the situation?
Thanks,
Shannon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
			 
			
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:00 am
				by John Harvey
				Ben, are you able to provide the missing information?
• Symptoms at present
• Whether new, aggravated, or old
• Conium regime
Thanks --
John Harvey
			 
			
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:34 am
				by muthu kumar
				Shannon-
I know that there are more superstitions about potency, more than
almost anything else in homeopathy.
Still I have seen lots of times repetition of remedies
indiscriminately has given rise to problems. I have seen that in many
cases. There is no high or low question here.
Having said that, authorities like Sarabhai Kabadia etc. have given
repeated high potencies and claim good results. In my own practice I
have usually given 2 or 3 doses of the remedy, and waited. The second
and third is supposed to moderate the effect of the single dose.
As a general rule lower potencies are advisable for the elderly but
without such repetition.  I have found 30c is sufficient to start with
 in the elderly. For remedies that are poisonous in their natural
physical state anything less than 30c not advisable. Lachesis, Conium
etc. ( As I adduced to before what Boericke says about Phos dosage is
always a good advice)
-- In 
minutus@yahoogroups.com, Shannon  wrote:
proved 
in a 
the 
infection 
the 
potency. 
weak.
again
the 
simillimum) 
He is
contained in 
this
arising 
minutus 
howsoever
 
			 
			
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:42 am
				by muthu kumar
				What is an antidote? Homeopathic antidote is the medicine that is most
similar to the picture. Since it is also dynamic it "gentles" the
landing as you want. It does not  totally negate the effects - it
moderates. That is why a lot of antidotal remedies also are remedies
that follow well.
In this case, IF the dominant picture is still of Conium and the
assumption is that the remedy by repetition has caused the symptoms -
Conium in higher potencies and without repetition can antidote the
artificial disease ( caused by low potency Conium repetition) and
probably address the natural disease ( which also is Conium).
Antidoting does not take you back to square one.
--- In 
minutus@yahoogroups.com, Shannon  wrote:
attains 
drugs 
these 
died, 
remedy in 
Alternatively, to 
strictly
condition
the
 
			 
			
					
				Re: First Do Not Harm
				Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:03 am
				by Michele Graham
				I read an article on the net recently about a woman dying (probably) from 
self administration of Arsenicum. See 
www.curantur.de/English/Articles/Repetitions
Michele.