Susceptibility, proving, case management

[jdurfeeathome]

In a message dated 8/8/2002 9:34:43 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
rosemaryhyde@mindspring.com writes:
One time I had to cool off a dose of Sulphur 200c about 2 months after giving
that had brought out an eczema on the leg of a child that had never been
present before. 30c was given and the eczema appeared over the next week on
to the lower back. After a few days it was gone as well as the allergies and
behavior problem which was the reason for treatment, and low and behold the
scoliosis was gone 8 months later, an unexpected surprise.

How could I view this as an antidotal action?
Is it antidotal some times and not at others? Then how to predict?

Barbara
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Joy Lucas]

Dear Barbara, what you have described is a great healing process. Just
because a 2 month old hasn't had eczema it doesn't mean that the
susceptibility wasn't there - it might have been suppressed or it might just
have needed to come out as part of the healing process. Perhaps what is
debateable is the initial potency being a bit aggressive and going down the
scale smoothed off the curing process. I don't entirely see that as being
antidotal just good case managment and part of the learning curve. You can't
always predict the outcome of a case - even careful case taking doesn't
reveal all, but it just shows how you have to be on your toes all the time.

best wishes, Joy Lucas
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

[Shannon Nelson]

Hi Barbara,

I agree - not antidotal!
I've been told that for antidoting, you'd go *one step* down or up -- 199c,
201c, etc. (Anyone remember who might have taught that???)

Shannon
on 8/10/02 11:45 PM, jdurfeeathome@aol.com at jdurfeeathome@aol.com wrote: