BLP vs. Wikipedia

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Post Reply
Roger B
Posts: 1056
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 10:00 pm

BLP vs. Wikipedia

Post by Roger B »

The blowback at the corrupt and bigoted scientific and academic community for ignoring "fringe" science may have begun. This is only the beginning.

This lawsuit is about Blacklight Power versus Wikipedia. I am not a big fan of either Blacklight Power or Wikipedia, but BLP has a right to NOT be called frauds and Wikipedia does NOT have a right to call people frauds without positive evidence. Since I have been following BLP for several years and I am certain that I am uncertain about them, I have no sympathy for Wikipedia calling them frauds.

People involved in homeopathy, flower remedies, essential oils and a whole host of other things should be cheering for BLP to rip Wikipedia in court:

http://www.williamslopatto.com/uploads/ ... plaint.pdf

"Consensus science" is a contradiction in terms. Only the evidence counts. And the so-called experts are inherently incapable of being able to accept new paradigms.

Sincerely,
Roger Bird


Top
Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”