hi all,
by my meagre understanding of miasm - it is a uncured acute turning into a chronic. and under that situation, it will impact on the sperm & ova (chromosones) to pass on suseptibilites to the child.
So yes AIDS/HIV I think certainly meets that criteria. There's a whole generation being born from HIV couples or "discordant" couples (only 1 is HIV+) - while the kids didn't get the infection itself (HIV negative), they may be suseptable to more infections. That too is part of the criteria of miasms, no? That it permeates the population. We haven't seen the 2nd generation yet.
I haven't had much opportunity to research or track such cases. However there's one I believe demostrates. I can't give the history without permission. Child is tested HIV-negative, 1 parent is HIV+. I tried different rxs incl nosodes for the chronic problems, with small effect. But the case seemed to take a turn only after AIDS nos was administered. Other nosodes (indicating other miasms involved) didn't impact as much.
In HIV+ kids, I believe that the thymus is affected. Among other problems, they don't grow as much. I know one child, now around 13 yr and she was born HIV+. She had many problems as a toddler. Now she's on ART, doing well, and well grown, but physically she's still somewhat stunted. (and ART makes her a bit fat).
Whether or not HIV deserves its own category in the "official" spectrum of miasms, I leave to the scholars. I think we need to track the cases to the 2nd generation to know that.
With regards,
Didi Ananda Ruchira | Tel: +254 (0)723-869133 | www.abhalight.org
Is AIDS a Miasm?
Re: Is AIDS a Miasm?
does anybody know how the AIDS nosode was produced? i see sooooo much conflicting info about AIDS and HIV, impossible for me to confirm any of it. it makes the giving of the AIDS nosode that much more confusing and uncertain. at least if there's a family history of syphilis you feel confident that syphilinum could be indicated at some point; but with AIDS, who knows?
From: "Abha Light Foundation abhalight@gmail.com [minutus]"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:10 AM
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Is AIDS a Miasm?
hi all,
by my meagre understanding of miasm - it is a uncured acute turning into a chronic. and under that situation, it will impact on the sperm & ova (chromosones) to pass on suseptibilites to the child.
So yes AIDS/HIV I think certainly meets that criteria. There's a whole generation being born from HIV couples or "discordant" couples (only 1 is HIV+) - while the kids didn't get the infection itself (HIV negative), they may be suseptable to more infections. That too is part of the criteria of miasms, no? That it permeates the population. We haven't seen the 2nd generation yet.
I haven't had much opportunity to research or track such cases. However there's one I believe demostrates. I can't give the history without permission. Child is tested HIV-negative, 1 parent is HIV+. I tried different rxs incl nosodes for the chronic problems, with small effect. But the case seemed to take a turn only after AIDS nos was administered. Other nosodes (indicating other miasms involved) didn't impact as much.
In HIV+ kids, I believe that the thymus is affected. Among other problems, they don't grow as much. I know one child, now around 13 yr and she was born HIV+. She had many problems as a toddler. Now she's on ART, doing well, and well grown, but physically she's still somewhat stunted. (and ART makes her a bit fat).
Whether or not HIV deserves its own category in the "official" spectrum of miasms, I leave to the scholars. I think we need to track the cases to the 2nd generation to know that.
With regards,
Didi Ananda Ruchira | Tel: +254 (0)723-869133 | http://www.abhalight.org/
From: "Abha Light Foundation abhalight@gmail.com [minutus]"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 2:10 AM
Subject: [Minutus] Re: Is AIDS a Miasm?
hi all,
by my meagre understanding of miasm - it is a uncured acute turning into a chronic. and under that situation, it will impact on the sperm & ova (chromosones) to pass on suseptibilites to the child.
So yes AIDS/HIV I think certainly meets that criteria. There's a whole generation being born from HIV couples or "discordant" couples (only 1 is HIV+) - while the kids didn't get the infection itself (HIV negative), they may be suseptable to more infections. That too is part of the criteria of miasms, no? That it permeates the population. We haven't seen the 2nd generation yet.
I haven't had much opportunity to research or track such cases. However there's one I believe demostrates. I can't give the history without permission. Child is tested HIV-negative, 1 parent is HIV+. I tried different rxs incl nosodes for the chronic problems, with small effect. But the case seemed to take a turn only after AIDS nos was administered. Other nosodes (indicating other miasms involved) didn't impact as much.
In HIV+ kids, I believe that the thymus is affected. Among other problems, they don't grow as much. I know one child, now around 13 yr and she was born HIV+. She had many problems as a toddler. Now she's on ART, doing well, and well grown, but physically she's still somewhat stunted. (and ART makes her a bit fat).
Whether or not HIV deserves its own category in the "official" spectrum of miasms, I leave to the scholars. I think we need to track the cases to the 2nd generation to know that.
With regards,
Didi Ananda Ruchira | Tel: +254 (0)723-869133 | http://www.abhalight.org/
-
Shannon Nelson
- Posts: 8848
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm
Re: Is AIDS a Miasm?
I recall reading that it was prepared "from the blood of a patient who had died from complications of AIDS." Which makes it more complex -- and therefore arguably more useful -- than a potentization of a presumed pathogen only.
Shannon
Shannon
Re: Is AIDS a Miasm?
thanks Shannon.
From: "Shannon Nelson shannonnelson@tds.net [minutus]"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Is AIDS a Miasm?
I recall reading that it was prepared "from the blood of a patient who had died from complications of AIDS." Which makes it more complex -- and therefore arguably more useful -- than a potentization of a presumed pathogen only.
Shannon
From: "Shannon Nelson shannonnelson@tds.net [minutus]"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Is AIDS a Miasm?
I recall reading that it was prepared "from the blood of a patient who had died from complications of AIDS." Which makes it more complex -- and therefore arguably more useful -- than a potentization of a presumed pathogen only.
Shannon
-
healthinfo6
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:00 pm
Re: Is AIDS a Miasm?
How could AIDS not become a miasm?
How long did it take for Cancer and Tuberculosis to become miasms?
though considered newly recognized since Hahnemann's original three.
Susan
AIDS deaths decline, but not HIV cases: UNAIDS report
7/16/14
The number of people living with HIV worldwide has remained virtually unchanged in the past two years and AIDS-related deaths are at their lowest since peaking almost a decade ago, according to a report from the United Nations AIDS agency released Wednesday.
Officials declared that ending the AIDS epidemic is possible even though they acknowledged the number of new infections - more than 2 million last year - was still very high. UNAIDS estimated there were about 35 million people living with HIV last year and in 2012. The agency noted that more than half of those infected - some 19 million people - do not know their HIV status.
The agency also set targets to reduce deaths and new cases by 90 percent by 2030. It previously unveiled a strategy to get to "zero AIDS-related deaths," which included ensuring all people who need treatment are on it by 2015.
Last year, there were about 12.9 million people receiving life-saving drugs and 22 million people still waiting. Some 1.5 million people died from AIDS-related causes.
Other health experts questioned whether setting more ambitious targets is wise.
"This idea of ending AIDS isn't realistic," said Sophie Harman, a senior lecturer in public health at Queen Mary University of London, who was not part of the report. She said it would be more helpful to think about managing the epidemic.
"Everyone can get behind ending AIDS, but this report doesn't really tell us how to do that."
Still, UNAIDS insisted in its report that we are at the "beginning of the end of the AIDS epidemic" and said the global outbreak can be stopped by 2030.
But with no vaccine and millions of people carrying the virus or becoming newly infected, some scientists said ending HIV may be idealistic rather than practical .
"We've made progress , but the number of people getting infected is still extraordinarily high," said Shabbar Jaffar, a professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. He said that scaling up treatment further, especially in Africa , where about 70 percent of people with HIV live, would be very difficult. "They are already working beyond capacity at the moment."
Jaffar said it was misleading to suggest we are close to eliminating AIDS.
"The road will get longer and harder and we really don't know where we're going to end up," he said.
CBS/AP
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/aids-deaths ... ds-report/
How long did it take for Cancer and Tuberculosis to become miasms?
though considered newly recognized since Hahnemann's original three.
Susan
AIDS deaths decline, but not HIV cases: UNAIDS report
7/16/14
The number of people living with HIV worldwide has remained virtually unchanged in the past two years and AIDS-related deaths are at their lowest since peaking almost a decade ago, according to a report from the United Nations AIDS agency released Wednesday.
Officials declared that ending the AIDS epidemic is possible even though they acknowledged the number of new infections - more than 2 million last year - was still very high. UNAIDS estimated there were about 35 million people living with HIV last year and in 2012. The agency noted that more than half of those infected - some 19 million people - do not know their HIV status.
The agency also set targets to reduce deaths and new cases by 90 percent by 2030. It previously unveiled a strategy to get to "zero AIDS-related deaths," which included ensuring all people who need treatment are on it by 2015.
Last year, there were about 12.9 million people receiving life-saving drugs and 22 million people still waiting. Some 1.5 million people died from AIDS-related causes.
Other health experts questioned whether setting more ambitious targets is wise.
"This idea of ending AIDS isn't realistic," said Sophie Harman, a senior lecturer in public health at Queen Mary University of London, who was not part of the report. She said it would be more helpful to think about managing the epidemic.
"Everyone can get behind ending AIDS, but this report doesn't really tell us how to do that."
Still, UNAIDS insisted in its report that we are at the "beginning of the end of the AIDS epidemic" and said the global outbreak can be stopped by 2030.
But with no vaccine and millions of people carrying the virus or becoming newly infected, some scientists said ending HIV may be idealistic rather than practical .
"We've made progress , but the number of people getting infected is still extraordinarily high," said Shabbar Jaffar, a professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. He said that scaling up treatment further, especially in Africa , where about 70 percent of people with HIV live, would be very difficult. "They are already working beyond capacity at the moment."
Jaffar said it was misleading to suggest we are close to eliminating AIDS.
"The road will get longer and harder and we really don't know where we're going to end up," he said.
CBS/AP
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/aids-deaths ... ds-report/