Q v LM potencies

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Q v LM potencies

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

Dear colleagues,
This point came up during Sheilagh Creasy's master class on Saturday.
Although colleagues have become used to using the term LM, it is incorrect as in Roman numerals M =1000 and L = 50 and LM means 950 as opposed to 50,000, which is the dilution ratio of the Q potencies.

(For example V=5 and I = 1, but IV = 4 - so you take the preceding amount from the right hand letter.

Therefore LM = 1000-50 = 950)
Q = quinquagintamillesimal-potencies (A bit of a mouthful - I know!)
Please always therefore use Q rather LM potency and also please tell colleagues.
Regards

Soroush


Hennie Duits
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: Q v LM potencies

Post by Hennie Duits »

Please note:

The symbols V, L and D are *not* used to be subtracted.
LM is correct for 50,000, (if you like: L.M)

BR,

Hennie

finrod@finrod.co.uk [minutus] schreef op 23-6-2014 21:36:


Fran Sheffield
Posts: 676
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 11:00 pm

Re: Q v LM potencies

Post by Fran Sheffield »

I've always called the Fifty Millesimals, though Q potencies would be just as good.

Fran.


Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
Posts: 2279
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Q v LM potencies

Post by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD »

Does it really matter?
It is one of those entrenched denominations that means the same thing to everybody.....

Joe.

Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.

"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"

www.naturamedica.co.nz


Hennie Duits
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:00 pm

Re: Q v LM potencies

Post by Hennie Duits »

Right!

'Dr. J Rozencwajg, NMD' jroz@ihug.co.nz [minutus] schreef op 24-6-2014 3:08:


Kristy Lampe
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: Q v LM potencies

Post by Kristy Lampe »

Another good reason to use “Q” is when one is writing out instructions or labels.
In handwriting, “1LM” can be confused with “1M” – there is no mix-up using “1Q” or “Q1”!!!
Regards,
Kristy
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3972/7735 - Release Date: 06/24/14


Judith
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 10:00 pm

Re: Q v LM potencies

Post by Judith »

To further confuse... The below Roman Numeral should be the actual designation for the so-called LM or Q potency.

L| = 50,000 = quinquaginta milia

(I'd walk a M| miles for
I of your smiles...)

Judith Mateo - Portland OR


healthinfo6
Posts: 987
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:00 pm

Re: Q v LM potencies

Post by healthinfo6 »

Learn the basic units of Roman numerals. Use the following (Roman to Arabic) list:

* I – 1 (One)
* V – 5 (Five)
* X – 10 (Ten)
* L – 50 (Fifty)
* C – 100 (hundred)
* M – 1000 (Thousands)

Read the Roman numerals from left to right.
If values of individual numerals are decreasing or equal, then add them together to get the value of the whole Roman numeral. For example , XVII is equal to 10+5+1+1 = 17 and XX is equal to 10+10=20.
If values of individual numerals are increasing from left to right then subtract and get the value of the whole Roman numerals. For example, IV is equal to 5-1 = 4.
If a Roman numeral doesn’t fall under any of the above explained categories, then convert it using the first category and get the value. For example, the value of XIV can be obtained as 10+ (5-1) = 14; MLM is equal to 1000 + (1000-50) = 1950.
Very large Roman numerals are expressed by placing a bar above a smaller Roman numeral. If a bar is placed above Roman numerals then it become 1000 times large. For example, a bar placed over V is equal to 5000.
http://www.brighthubeducation.com/homew ... -numerals/
Susan


Soroush Ebrahimi
Moderator
Posts: 4510
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 11:00 pm

Re: Q v LM potencies

Post by Soroush Ebrahimi »

What would skeptic say?

These guys cannot even number!
We also have a problem on C scale with CM and MM! :-)

Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 24 June 2014 02:08
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Q v LM potencies
Does it really matter?
It is one of those entrenched denominations that means the same thing to everybody.....

Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
www.naturamedica.co.nz


Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
Posts: 2279
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Q v LM potencies

Post by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD »

Who cares about what they say? 8-)

Joe.

Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD.

"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"

www.naturamedica.co.nz


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”