Imagine if you will . . . . .

[Roger B]

Imagine if you will a large board. And on that large board are switches and dials and electrical connections between the switches and dials. Some of the switches and dials are connected in parallel and some are in series. There are inputs and outputs. Some connections are feedback loops. Let's say that we have one such board that is not working properly.

Conventional health science would have us flip one and only one switch or spin one and only one dial at a time. What happens when two switches in series are off (but you can't see that). You flip switch A and nothing happens. Then you flip it back and flip switch B and nothing happens. So, conventional science will tell you that flipping switch A or flipping switch B does not heal the person.

This is how conventional health science wants you to do things. They will tell you that if you flip a bunch of switches all at once that it is not "scientific".

There are actually 7 billion such boards, and all of them have their switches and dials set differently, but conventional health science insists that you flip only one switch at a time, in order to "isolate the factors of causation".

All this is very confusing to me, so I decided instead to base my thinking on certain principles and my own experience. The principles are the theory of evolution, traditional cuisines, and the principle to do the least amount of harm possible within the framework of the theory of evolution. I am able to flip and spin the switches and dials all at once and get the "board" to work properly. If I were to do conventional health science's way of doing things, I'd be dead long before they catch up with me and my success.

Roger Bird