[hpe] how close is too close....

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Shannon Nelson
Posts: 8848
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: [hpe] how close is too close....

Post by Shannon Nelson »

Eyaaaagh, never mind… (sighs heavily)
You have completely missed my point again, I give up.
cheers


John Harvey
Posts: 1331
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:00 pm

Re: [hpe] how close is too close....

Post by John Harvey »

Shannon, perhaps I have missed your point. But in that case perhaps you need to take some responsibility for pursuing a topic in such a way that somebody as dense as I obviously am can follow your train of thought. Partly because you and I have had so much difficulty in the past in communicating on the perfectly simple matter of what the homoeopathic principle implies, I've tried to keep my discussion as straightforward as possible and to stick to the one issue, without dragging in too many assumptions and side-issues. I'm still keeping to that topic: the inherence of monopharmacy to homoeopathy.

When you introduce a novel topic into the discussion, such as your assumption that "double-guessing" is a pejorative term (and shouldn't be), I try to respond without having the entire discussion highjacked by considerations of who is doing good and who is doing evil. But you seem bent on never sticking to the point.
Joe, your basic claim, it seems fair to say, was that polypharmacy cannot be excluded from homoeopathy by dint of our collective ignorance of the pure effects of a mixture. Your exact words, three days ago, were:

"You are completely wrong about polypharmacy not knowing the primary effect of the medicine.
But of course that is something you will not accept, you know better than those who use it what they do and do not know".

You then admitted, the next day, the entire falsehood of this claim, in these words:

"there are no pathogeneses of mixtures".

Is there anything more to say, once you've admitted that?
Kind regards,

John


Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
Posts: 2279
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: [hpe] how close is too close....

Post by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD »

There are no pathogeneses of MIXTURES!

But there are pathogeneses of the different separate components, and those remain in the mixture, with the possibility of enhancing some aspects through synergy!
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD. "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind". www.naturamedica.webs.com


Irene de Villiers
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:00 pm

Re: [hpe] how close is too close....

Post by Irene de Villiers »

Suggest YOU look in the mirror when you read that.
:-)
I
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”