I agree with you in principle but not with how you threw darts around without caring who they hit.
The only person doing any nastiness was Dana.
I raised no "defences" and I did not "bicker" in return.
SO with only one person being ugly ....it is not "bickering" but merely...... one person being ugly.
Others told him to knock it off. They bothered to see who was doing it.
That seemed an end to it - should have been
Bickering implies more than one person at fault. AND you claim a "homeopath" was bickering. Dana is not a homeoapth. I am the only name he uses so that points your unwarranted darts very specifically at me and nobody else. Same with Fran's "dirty laundry" comment with which you agreed.
I'm suggesting - be careful where your darts are aimed. Skip the comments if you do not understand the situation.
It is not good enough to claim they are vaguely thrown at nobody in general, when they can only point to one person with YOUR chosen wording!
I think if the tables were turned you would also feel unduly chastised as a "homeopath" for "bickering" that was specifically NOT done. Please drop the subject now. The real guilty party does not deserve the attention.
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."