Jan Scholten UNDER ATTACK for AIDS treatment

Sheri Nakken · Post by **Sheri Nakken** » Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:49 am

and even if you do have something they detect with any of the tests, it is still meaningless.
You are too allopathic in your thinking
Sheri

At 11:50 PM 7/11/2014, you wrote:
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases and Child Health
Next classes start September

Sheri Nakken · Post by **Sheri Nakken** » Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:51 am

sigh.............what you call science is not. It is sham
Sheri

At 11:32 PM 7/11/2014, Irene de Villiers furryboots@icehouse.net [minutus] wrote:
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases and Child Health
Next classes start September

Irene de Villiers · Post by **Irene de Villiers** » Sat Jul 12, 2014 12:32 pm

That's your prerogative,
I could see that as a compliment.

--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

Irene de Villiers · Post by **Irene de Villiers** » Sat Jul 12, 2014 12:37 pm

When were you last behind a micrescope in a science lab to know the difference?
I did my research, and am good at it.
If you choose to believe fiction, that also is your prerogative.
However, it is always easier to get success with cases, if you understand and take ito account, the pathology of metabolic factors around the actual maintaining cause or causes.
Hence I shall agree to differ with you.

Namaste,
...Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

healthinfo6 · Post by **healthinfo6** » Sat Jul 12, 2014 1:41 pm

Not sure what you mean by successful?
If you're treating someone in the USA who is HIV+ and is already taking AIDS drugs early on since diagnosis, they may not have any symptoms/diseases/complications associated with AIDS and generally go for biannual, more or less, blood tests to measure their HIV viral load. The general goal is to be considered non-detectable meaning they have less than maybe 100 or 50 HIV viral copies.
The only way I see to test if homeopathic treatment is successful here is to stop taking the drugs, keep doing blood tests and if the HIV viral load goes back up past the 1000s you have to monitor T cells to see if they start dropping over time, if they go below a certain threshold, that's when various infections can occur and it's encouraged to restart drugs.
It's possible with homeopathic treatment one could go off drugs, develop higher HIV viral loads and not have any further complications, like T cells dropping or maybe not have further increases in HIV virus at all.
In the past, standard HIV treatment allowed an option for a drug "holiday" where a patient would go off all drugs and were monitored for viral loads and T cells. That practice stopped because patients would have large increases in HIV viral loads along with T cells dropping. Rebuilding ones T cells takes time.
Wasn't there work being done where AIDS is considered a miasm? Is there an AIDS nosode? Are there rubrics yet identified to prescribe an AIDS nosode based on observed traits, characteristics, like in Carcinosin?
Susan

Tanya Marquette · Post by **Tanya Marquette** » Sat Jul 12, 2014 4:05 pm

I knew a woman with AIDs/HIV (never quite clear with her on what state she was in)
She took herself off the drugs when she became symptomatic of drug damage and would
stay off them until conditions seemed, to her, to warrant using them again. She had been
doing this for some time back then. Lost track of her so cannot know how she fared over
the past approx 8 yrs.
t
From: mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 12:18 PM
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] Re: Jan Scholten UNDER ATTACK for AIDS treatment

Not sure what you mean by successful?
If you're treating someone in the USA who is HIV+ and is already taking AIDS drugs early on since diagnosis, they may not have any symptoms/diseases/complications associated with AIDS and generally go for biannual, more or less, blood tests to measure their HIV viral load. The general goal is to be considered non-detectable meaning they have less than maybe 100 or 50 HIV viral copies.
The only way I see to test if homeopathic treatment is successful here is to stop taking the drugs, keep doing blood tests and if the HIV viral load goes back up past the 1000s you have to monitor T cells to see if they start dropping over time, if they go below a certain threshold, that's when various infections can occur and it's encouraged to restart drugs.
It's possible with homeopathic treatment one could go off drugs, develop higher HIV viral loads and not have any further complications, like T cells dropping or maybe not have further increases in HIV virus at all.
In the past, standard HIV treatment allowed an option for a drug "holiday" where a patient would go off all drugs and were monitored for viral loads and T cells. That practice stopped because patients would have large increases in HIV viral loads along with T cells dropping. Rebuilding ones T cells takes time.
Wasn't there work being done where AIDS is considered a miasm? Is there an AIDS nosode? Are there rubrics yet identified to prescribe an AIDS nosode based on observed traits, characteristics, like in Carcinosin?
Susan