Turn the volume down on the TV then:-)
BOTH Sul and Lyc: haughty, dictatorial, egotistical, quarrelsome, religious, sensitive, tactiturn.
SUL only: absorbed, worse for embarassment, strong conscience, communicative, poor grooming, fanaticism, short neck, wide torso, big and broad head, strong eye expression, shortwaisted.
LYC only: worse from contradiction or deception, easy anger, delusions he neglected his duty, fear being alone or appearing in public, weak character (ego is bravado hiding behind coward) , emaciation when older, longwaisted "long and lithe", longbodied, long neck and head, very narrow hips.
Hahnemann was a clear Sulph.
Where do you see Lyc?
EEw, well I can not see any doubt:-)
He was no coward, he had real character and was definitely a fanatic!
I see No chance of confusing Plat or Lyc either:-)
Why do you say that?
Sulph is the inventor type, not Lyc.
Sulph will observe what is about and figure how to use it to invent new stuff. Sulph will take stuff apart to see how it works.
Restlessness - sul and Lyc both have that - it is not cowardice.
Cowardice would show in not supportig his theories, hardly the case with H.
Lyc ages by getting skinny and losing hair, Sul ages without losing weight, cares little for own appearance though so will look poorly.
No, these featureare Sul and Lyc - you have to look at those that are one without te other.
Lyc is capricious, Sul wants attention, Lyc is superficial, Sul is fanatic about his ideas.
What do you mean?
Again - what do you mean?
A type is aligned to genetics - its for life.
No. They are both very sensitive actually. Sul's like to show off, but Lyc's play around, it is a subtle difference.
No it is deadly to some:-)
With THAT hairstyle?
I have not studied him but I suspect you have not known any Lycs, or you would see the difference.
I'd agree that Phos is more common than say Lach or Colch, but it has no gender propensity aqnd is nowhere near a large percentage of individuals of any species.
YOu are dreaming:-)
So is he.
Examples:
Easy to differentiate if you look ONLY at what is in one rem and not another, and eliminate all sx that are common between the optios you are considering.
Then use the PHYSICAL traits. They are very definite.
For example, IF you are truly an Ars, then you will have these traits:
(Tell me if I am anywhere close)
Taller than average, with long arms but they were short when you were a small kid compared to your long torso and you had some chubbiness as a baby, were not that tall to start with but shot up a lot in one particular year, suddenly becoming tall. As a baby, studied stuff with amazingly long concentrtion span rather than walking soon, but as an adult have very strong muscles, almost a wiry tall build, a lot of long muscle - could tend to add weight when older. Very capable in intellectual areas especially developing new ideas. DO not need help, can do it solo.
No bum to speak of, pants tend to fall down if not held up. You walk with a long stride, may be good at long distance running, but not at sprinting. Probably want to live somewhere uncrowded.
Yes???? No???
No Sil is smaller in stature, strongly athletic --- not Sul, too lazy:-) .
Oh they are, and with pertinacity too, but not the same kind of imperiousness of a Sul, nor the rather faked way of a Lyc.
....Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
