Question for homoeopaths

Here you will find all the discussions from the time this group was hosted on YahooGroups and groups.io
You can browse through these topics and reply to them as needed.
It is not possible to start new topics in this forum. Please use the respective other forums most related to your topic.
Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
Posts: 2279
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD »

Totally delusional..........
End of conversation.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
________________________________

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.


John R. Benneth
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by John R. Benneth »

Wow, there's an aggravation for you. Ha! Hey, maybe we ought to call it the F-U series . .
But don't worry, Joe, it'll work out alright. Take two Nux-v 30c and call me in the mourning!
eructations,
Benneth
Note to Irene: Hahnemann was a Lycopodium . . he told me himself, and I ought to know . . I'm an Arsenicum and I hear voices!
In a message dated 11/29/2013 3:09:12 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, jroz@ihug.co.nz writes:
________________________________

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)


Irene de Villiers
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by Irene de Villiers »

Nothing Lyc about him at all:-)
Neither as a character nor physically.

.....Irene

REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."


John R. Benneth
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by John R. Benneth »

In a message dated 11/30/2013 1:44:30 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, furryboots@icehouse.net writes:
Well, this is all speculation for entertainment's sake, for who will ever know for sure, but I would say he was absolutely a Lyc., Platinas should relate, as they are often mistaken for Lycopodiums. Hahnemann obviously had a keen (genius) intellect, imperious, egomaniac, fleeing from town to town (cowardice), bald, extreme aging . . in his photo Hahn. looks like a cadaver, , hypochondriac, well, who but a hypochondriac would invent a radically different system of medicine, the focus on disease, fear of allopathic treatment, i.e. didn't have the guts i.e. stupidity to murder people while pretending to cure them , . . irascible, avers. to contradiction, gets involved with a younger woman, won't treat Vivaldi for flirting with her. That's a Lycopodium. Just the fact you would see Sulphur in him adds to my point, Lyc. is in the finish of Sul. Sul's are too scattered, insensitive self absorbed and goofy, merging with everything and anything to have authored the world's greatest work. It's so broadly indicated at some point, I think, everyone needs a dose of Sulphur at some time or another. Einstein was also, probably, a Lyc. and just as Lyc. is one of the top three polychrests in the number of symptoms it covers, it is also like Sul and Phos one of the most common remedy patterns in Western men. I say its pandemic, covering most professionals, homeopaths, allopaths, academics, politicans, bureaucrats, managers, ranking officers, scientists, on and on, the bully and the bullied. Bailey says you walk into a science classroom and every man jack of them is a Lycopodium.
Maybe someone could throw some water on this, set me straight and shut me up? Kaviraj thought Hahnemann was a Silica, but Silica's don't have the focus on disease that the Lyc.s do and I don't think they're imperious enough to pull off what Hahn. did . . although they do tend to go bald sooner.
LOL!
best,
Benneth


Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD
Posts: 2279
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 10:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by Dr. Joe Rozencwajg, NMD »

I must admit I do not understand you post, it seems to contain some humour though, I think I should say thanks in any case......you should know that I do not use 30C any more in any case, hahaha,

Joe.
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, NMD "The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind"
________________________________

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.


Irene de Villiers
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by Irene de Villiers »

Will discuss later - have urgent issue first.. Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."


RC
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 10:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by RC »

Could the determining of the remedy a person is associated with mean- because it is a vibrational modality- the person's vibration is in tuned with that particular remedies vibration?
Robin
General Dip. Hom.
---In minutus@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Will discuss later - have urgent issue first.. Irene


Irene de Villiers
Posts: 3237
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 10:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by Irene de Villiers »

In my view YES.
..Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."


Elizabeth Brandegee
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by Elizabeth Brandegee »

Kaviraj may have been correct. I have had the same contemplation. Silica most certainly *can* have as much focus on disease/medicine (and better, more complete) than Lyc.
:) Liz
---In minutus@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
In a message dated 11/30/2013 1:44:30 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, furryboots@... writes:
Well, this is all speculation for entertainment's sake, for who will ever know for sure, but I would say he was absolutely a Lyc., Platinas should relate, as they are often mistaken for Lycopodiums. Hahnemann obviously had a keen (genius) intellect, imperious, egomaniac, fleeing from town to town (cowardice), bald, extreme aging . . in his photo Hahn. looks like a cadaver, , hypochondriac, well, who but a hypochondriac would invent a radically different system of medicine, the focus on disease, fear of allopathic treatment, i.e. didn't have the guts i.e. stupidity to murder people while pretending to cure them , . . irascible, avers. to contradiction, gets involved with a younger woman, won't treat Vivaldi for flirting with her. That's a Lycopodium. Just the fact you would see Sulphur in him adds to my point, Lyc. is in the finish of Sul. Sul's are too scattered, insensitive self absorbed and goofy, merging with everything and anything to have authored the world's greatest work. It's so broadly indicated at some point, I think, everyone needs a dose of Sulphur at some time or another. Einstein was also, probably, a Lyc. and just as Lyc. is one of the top three polychrests in the number of symptoms it covers, it is also like Sul and Phos one of the most common remedy patterns in Western men. I say its pandemic, covering most professionals, homeopaths, allopaths, academics, politicans, bureaucrats, managers, ranking officers, scientists, on and on, the bully and the bullied. Bailey says you walk into a science classroom and every man jack of them is a Lycopodium.
Maybe someone could throw some water on this, set me straight and shut me up? Kaviraj thought Hahnemann was a Silica, but Silica's don't have the focus on disease that the Lyc.s do and I don't think they're imperious enough to pull off what Hahn. did . . although they do tend to go bald sooner.
LOL!
best,
Benneth
John Benneth, Homoeopath
PG Hom - London (Hons.)
http://johnbenneth.com
SKYPE: John Benneth (Portland, Oregon)
503- 819 - 7777 (USA)


John R. Benneth
Posts: 294
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:00 pm

Re: Question for homoeopaths

Post by John R. Benneth »

In a message dated 12/1/2013 5:49:04 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, coventrybird@gmail.com writes:
Hi Robin . .
Good question, might I take a stab at it?
I'd say the answer is "not exactly" . . the difference between homeoepathy and homeopathy illustrates . . the difference between dissimilar (allopathy). same (homeopathy) and similar (homoeopathy) are explained with
1, Dissimilar simply masks it and causes discordance, a new disease . .
2. Same simply adds to it, concordant, as more of the same disease . . but
3. Similar actually interrupts the wave form enrgetically . . and if loud enough, will shatter the molecular matrix materially. Similar is like but not same. Like the difference between two pianos playing the same note but out of tune with one another. The result is that the vibratory wave forms of the artificial and the natural disease are so close that the artificial cancels out the natural disease and then, being artifical, fades away if not repeateed too often, or LOL, given with too high a potency!
Medical similitude, homoeopathy, arose out of the observation that similar natural disease will not abide in the same body at the same time, and out of this arose the idea of using various animal, mineral, plant, and mycelium substances, radiant sources and psychiatric methods (Liz) that produce a similar, but never completely same symptom set artificially, to induce cure..
It's a very subtle concept which mainstream medicine has as yet failed to grasp, don't you think?
Benneth ;-)


Post Reply

Return to “Minutus YahooGroup Archives”