You can point out the differences between BFR and homeopathy all day long, and then declare that this proves that they are different. But anthropologists compare chimps and humans and I think that the differences are way greater.
The important similarity, which I think is much more important than any difference, is that both impact, change, affect (or is it effect; I think that it is affect) the vital force, the prana, the inner healing agency. But studying both, we can better understand how the vital inner healing agency "works" or does it's thing and how it changes.
Roger
BFR and homeopathy, love at first sight
-
John Harvey
- Posts: 1331
- Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:00 pm
Re: BFR and homeopathy, love at first sight
Hi, Roger --
Yes, that's fine. And it could be interesting. What's really dull is mucking through the same cockeyed confusion from the same self-interested practitioners who want their particular departure from the homoeopathic principle to be known as homoeopathy.
What insights have you had about the healing agency's operation from comparison of the two?
Kind regards,
John
Yes, that's fine. And it could be interesting. What's really dull is mucking through the same cockeyed confusion from the same self-interested practitioners who want their particular departure from the homoeopathic principle to be known as homoeopathy.
What insights have you had about the healing agency's operation from comparison of the two?
Kind regards,
John